Common and rare side-effects of low-dose thalidomide in multiple myeloma: focus on the dose-minimizing peripheral neuropathy

2004 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Offidani ◽  
Laura Corvatta ◽  
Monica Marconi ◽  
Lara Malerba ◽  
Anna Mele ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Shailendra Prasad Verma ◽  
Avaneesh Shukla ◽  
Punita Pavecha ◽  
Durga Prasad Verma ◽  
Rashmi Kushwaha

Bortezomib is one of the most commonly used drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma. It has many well-known side effects like peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopenia and diarrhoea. Paralytic ileus has been rarely reported in patients of multiple myeloma receiving bortezomib and one should be aware about this entity. Stool frequency should be carefully monitored and the drug should be stopped timely to prevent complications of paralytic ileus. The patient was admitted for management of multiple myeloma and supportive care. He was started on the VTD (Bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone) protocol. He developed abdominal distension and absolute constipation soon after the 2nd weekly dose of bortezomib. Abdominal X-ray revealed grossly dilated large bowel loops. Although he was given lactulose, glycerine suppository enema, the problem of abdominal distension and constipation persisted. His gastrointestinal symptoms improved and he was able to pass stools after bortezomib was removed from the protocol. One should be aware of this rare side effect of bortezomib. Bortezomib dose should be modified or it should be stopped timely to prevent complications.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1482-1482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Repoussis ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Maria Christina Kyrtsonis ◽  
Athanasios Zomas ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Thalidomide is usually administered orally continuously once daily and has shown remarkable activity in about 30% of patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma (MM). Moreover, there is considerable interest in the administration of thalidomide-containing combinations as primary treatment of MM. With such regimens at least 60% of patient achieve an objective response. Thalidomide can cause a variety of side effects whose incidence and severity may be related to the maximum dose and duration of thalidomide treatment. Furthermore, this drug may be poorly tolerated by older patients. We designed a phase II study for the primary treatment of elderly patients (≥ 75 years of age) with MM which was based on intermittent oral administration of melphalan, thalidomide and dexamethasone. Patients and Methods: This ongoing multicenter study was initiated in February 2003 and includes patients with symptomatic myeloma ≥75 years of age regardless of performance status, renal function, and comorbidities. Treatment consists of melphalan (M) 8mg/m2 days 1–4, dexamethasone (D) 12mg/m2 p.o. after breakfast on days 1–4 and 14–18 and thalidomide (T) 300 mg p.o. at bedtime on days 1–4 and 14–18. This regimen is repeated every 5 weeks for 3 courses. Patients without evidence of progressive disease are scheduled to receive 9 additional courses of MDT (but without DT on days 14–18) every 5 weeks. Results: As of July 2004, 43 patients have been enrolled. Their median age is 78 years (range: 75 to 85 years). Features of advanced myeloma are frequent and include International Staging System (ISS) 3 in 58%, hemoglobin <8.5g/dl in 13%, calcium >11.5 in 15%, creatinine > 2 mg/dl in 28% and elevated serum LDH in 11%. On an intent-to-treat basis, 72% of patients achieved at least a partial response (EBMT criteria) including 10% of patients who achieved a complete response with negative immunofixation. Median time to 50% reduction of monoclonal protein was 2 months (range 0.5 to 5.5). Grade 3 or 4 granylocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 15% and 10% of patients respectively. Twelve episodes of infections were noted one of which was fatal. Several patients developed thalidomide-related side effects, usually of mild or moderate degree, such as constipation (30%), somnolence (35%), tremor (25%), xerostomia (15%), headache (10%). Deep venous thromosis (DVT) and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 10% of patients each. With a mean follow-up of 15 months, 88% of patients remain alive. Conclusions: This is one of few prospective studies designed for myeloma patients with advanced age (≥75 years) ie patients who are frequently excluded from trials. The pulsed MDT regimen appears to be a well tolerated and active primary treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The incidence of DVT and of peripheral neuropathy appears lower than that seen when thalidomide is administered continuously. Patient accrual and follow-up is ongoing in order to assess the impact of this regimen on response duration and survival.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Bao ◽  
Ruixin Zhang ◽  
Ashraf Badros ◽  
Lixing Lao

Peripheral neuropathy is a common and severe dose-limiting side effect of the chemotherapy agent, bortezomib, in multiple myeloma patients. Treatment with narcotics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants has limited response and potential significant side effects. Acupuncture has been reported to be effective in treating diabetic neuropathy and chemo-induced peripheral neuropathy. There has not been report on the effect of acupuncture in treating bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy specifically. Here, we report a successful case of using acupuncture to relieve bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 80-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) who have relapsed on or are refractory to treatment (Tx) with novel agents lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) have few effective options for Tx and short overall survival (OS; Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a distinct oral IMiDs® immunomodulatory agent with direct antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). POM has been approved in the United States and the European Union for the Tx of pts with ≥ 2 prior Tx, including LEN and BORT, and progressive disease (PD) on Tx (EU, in combination with low-dose dexamethasone [LoDEX]) or within 60 days of completion of the last line of Tx (US). Results from the pivotal phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated that POM + LoDEX significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone in this pt population (San Miguel, Lancet Oncol, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 3b trial with > 85 sites across Europe designed to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population (N = 456 at data cutoff). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (PD during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), previous BORT and LEN Tx failure, and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last prior line of Tx. Key exclusion criteria included absolute neutrophil count < 800/μL , platelet count < 75,000 or < 30,000/μL (for pts with < 50% or ≥ 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells as plasma cells, respectively), creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min, hemoglobin < 8 g/dL, and peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade (Gr) 2. POM was administered at 4 mg D1-21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent. The primary endpoint was safety, and key secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and cytogenetic analyses. STRATUS is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01712789) and EudraCT (2012-001888-78). Results: As of March 17, 2014, 456 pts were enrolled and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; median age was 66 yrs (range, 37-88 yrs); median time since diagnosis was 4.9 yrs (range, 0.3-22.6 yrs). Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 5 prior Tx (range, 2-18); 78% were refractory to BORT and LEN. Median follow-up was 6.8 mos with a median of 4 cycles received. Median PFS and OS were 4.3 mos and 10.9 mos, respectively (Figure 1). The ORR was 35%, with 6% of pts achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR); median DOR was 6.0 mos. Similar PFS (4.2 and 3.9 mos), OS (10.9 mos for each), and ORR (34% and 33%) were achieved in pts refractory to prior LEN (n = 427) or LEN and BORT (n = 356), respectively. In addition, PFS (4.3 and 3.9 mos), OS (11.5 mos and not estimable), and ORR (27% and 37%) were consistent in pts with LEN (N = 172) or BORT (N = 189) as last prior treatment, respectively. The most frequent Gr 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hematologic, including neutropenia (39%), anemia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (19%); Gr 3-4 non-hematological toxicities included pneumonia (11%), fatigue (5%), and hypercalcemia (4%). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis was low (1%) with prophylaxis, and peripheral neuropathy was 1%. Dose reductions of either POM or LoDEX due to TEAEs were required in 28% of pts; discontinuations due to TEAEs were infrequent (9%). Conclusions: Results from STRATUS, the largest POM + LoDEX clinical trial thus far, were consistent with those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial, and confirm that this regimen has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile and shows substantial improvements in PFS and OS benefits. Combination therapy with POM and LoDEX represents a new standard of therapy for pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM in whom LEN and BORT Tx failed. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Doyen:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Simcock:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Miller:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Slaughter:Celgene: Employment. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


1974 ◽  
Vol 77 (3_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S87-S94 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wiese ◽  
M. Osler

ABSTRACT A retrospective investigation was made of contraception in diabetic women delivered in our department in 1969 and 1970. Seventy-nine (69 per cent) answered the questionnaires. About one third had found the contraceptive instruction insufficient. A shift from conventional to intrauterine contraception and sterilization was seen, but nearly 25% of the patients were still using conventional methods, mainly the condom. The patients consider this an unreliable method. Thirty-three patients were using intrauterine contraception. Although 10 of them had bleeding irregularities, all were satisfied with the method. Sterilization had been performed on 17 patients, all of whom were fully satisfied and had experienced no side effects. Four of 11 insulin-requiring diabetics, who have used combined oestrogen-progesterone medication have had difficulties in the regulation of the diabetes. Of 24 unwanted pregnancies 12 occurred since the hospitalization in 1969 and 1970. In diabetic women the contraceptive method should either be sterilization, intrauterine device or low dose progestagens, and only in a few cases conventional. A thorough contraceptive instruction as well as a close control of the diabetic women are of importance in order to avoid unplanned pregnancy. The best way to achieve this is by having an out-patient clinic in connection with the obstetrical department to supervise contraception in all diabetic women in the area.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Karolina Łuczkowska ◽  
Dorota Rogińska ◽  
Zofia Ulańczyk ◽  
Krzysztof Safranow ◽  
Edyta Paczkowska ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document