Frailty, health-related quality of life and mental well-being in older adults with cardiometabolic risk factors

2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1447-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kanauchi ◽  
A. Kubo ◽  
K. Kanauchi ◽  
Y. Saito
2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1732-1736
Author(s):  
George A Kelley ◽  
Kristi S Kelley

Abstract Background Provide robust and practically relevant information regarding the association between yoga, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL), and mental well-being (MWB) in older adults. Methods Data were derived from a recent meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled yoga trials representing 752 adults ≥60 years of age. Standardized mean difference effect sizes (ESs) were pooled using the recently developed quality effects model and 95% compatibility intervals (CI). Small-study effects were examined using the Doi plot and Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index. Sensitivity and cumulative meta-analyses were conducted as well as percentile improvement, number needed to treat (NNT), and number to benefit. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used to assess the strength of the evidence. Results Yoga was associated with improvements in both HRQOL (ES = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.25–0.77, I2 = 63.1%) and MWB (ES = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.15–0.63, I2 =56.2%). Percentile improvements were 19.5 for HRQOL and 15.3 for MWB whereas the NNT was 4 for HRQOL and 5 for MWB. An estimated 378,222 and 302,578 U.S. yoga-practicing adults ≥65 years of age could potentially improve their HRQOL and MWB, respectively. Major asymmetry suggestive of small-study effects was observed for MWB but not HRQOL. Further examination for asymmetry revealed that greater improvements in MWB were associated with more (151 vs. 68) minutes of yoga per week (p = .007). Overall strength of evidence was considered “high” for HRQOL and “moderate” for MWB. Conclusions Yoga is associated with improvements in HRQOL and MWB among older adults, with approximately 150 minutes or more per week possibly optimal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 1386-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Van de Cauter ◽  
Dirk De Bacquer ◽  
Els Clays ◽  
Delphine De Smedt ◽  
Kornelia Kotseva ◽  
...  

Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) can lead to loss of workability and early retirement. We aimed to investigate return to work (RTW) and its relationship towards psychosocial well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Design Secondary analyses were applied to cross-sectional data from the EUROASPIRE IV survey (European Action on Secondary and Primary prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events). Methods Participants were examined and interviewed at 6–36 months following the recruiting event. Psychosocial well-being and HRQoL were evaluated by completing the ‘Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale’ and ‘HeartQoL’ questionnaire. Using generalised mixed models, we calculated the odds ratios for RTW. Depression, anxiety and adjusted means of HeartQoL were estimated accounting for RTW. Results Out of 3291 employed patients, the majority (76.0%) returned to work, of which 85.6% were men, but there was a general underrepresentation of women. Young ( p < 0.001), high-educated ( p < 0.001) patients without prior cardiovascular events ( p < 0.05) were better off regarding RTW. No significant associations with CHD risk factors and cardiac rehabilitation were established. Those that rejoined the workforce were less susceptible to psychosocial distress (anxiety/depression, p < 0.001) and experienced a better quality of life ( p < 0.001). Conclusion These findings provide evidence that non-modifiable factors (sociodemographic factors, cardiovascular history), more than classical risk factors, are associated with RTW, and that patients who resume work display better psychosocial well-being and HRQoL. Our results illustrate a need for tailored cardiac rehabilitation with a focus on work-related aspects, mental health and HRQoL indicators to reach sustainable RTW, especially in vulnerable groups like less educated and elderly patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S515-S516
Author(s):  
Lan Doan ◽  
Yumie Takata ◽  
Karen Hooker ◽  
Carolyn Mendez-Luck ◽  
and Veronica L Irvin

Abstract Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for Asian American (AA), Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (NHPI) older adults, and AAs/NHPIs have not enjoyed decreases in CVD mortality rates, as have non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). Heterogeneity exists in the prevalence of traditional CVD risk factors for AAs/NHPIs. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) reflect physical and mental burdens beyond clinical burdens, which may help explain discrepant CVD rates and risk factors in AAs/NHPIs. We examined HRQOL among NHW and AA/NHPI Medicare Advantage enrollees with and without a CVD (i.e., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke) using the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. The sample included 655,914 older adults who were 65 years or older, self-reported as AA/NHPI or NHW, and were enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans in 2011-2015. HRQOL was measured using the Veterans RAND 12-item survey and is composed of a physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS), where higher scores reflect better physical and mental health, respectively. Multivariable linear regression was used to explore HRQOL and CVD prevalence. Asian Indian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Other Asian, and NHPI subgroups had lower overall PCS, and all AA/NHPI subgroups had lower overall MCS, compared to NHWs. Among those reporting having any CVD, PCS varied by CVD outcomes and subgroups, whereas MCS was lower for all CVD outcomes and for all but one AA/NHPI subgroups (Japanese), compared to NHWs. Attention to mental health for AA/NHPI older adults could be important for the equitable realization of healthy aging.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Pogodina ◽  
Ljubov Rychkova ◽  
Olga Kravtzova ◽  
Juliana Klimkina ◽  
Arjuna Kosovtzeva

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxane Dumont ◽  
Viviane Richard ◽  
Hélène Baysson ◽  
Elsa Lorthe ◽  
Giovanni Piumatti ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeOur objective was to assess adolescent’s Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and psychological distress, from their own and their parents’ perspective, and to examine associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Geneva, Switzerland.MethodsA random sample of adolescents, aged 14-17 years, and their families was invited to a serosurvey in November and December 2020. Adolescents’ HRQoL was evaluated using the validated adolescent-reported KIDSCREEN-10 and parent-reported KINDL® scales. Psychological distress was assessed with self-reported sadness and loneliness, and using the KINDL® emotional well-being scale. Risk factors for adolescents’ low HRQoL and psychological distress were identified using generalized estimating equations and both adolescents’ and their parents’ perceptions were compared.ResultsAmong 240 adolescents, 11% had a low HRQoL, 35% reported sadness and 23% reported loneliness. Based on parents’ perception, 12% of the adolescents had a low HRQoL and 16% a low emotional well-being. Being a girl (aOR=3.29; 95%CI: 1.64-6.57), increased time on social media (aOR=2.05; 95%CI: 1.08-3.88), parents’ average to poor mood (aOR=2.81; 95%CI: 1.21-6.56) and average to poor household financial situation (aOR=2.30; 95%CI: 1.00-5.29) were associated with an increased risk of sadness. Mismatches between adolescents’ and their parents’ perception of HRQoL were more likely for girls (aOR=2.88; 95%CI: 1.54-5.41) and in households with lower family well-being (aOR=0.91; 95%CI: 0.86-0.96).ConclusionA meaningful proportion of adolescents experienced low well-being during the second wave of COVID-19. Adolescents living in underprivileged or distressed families seemed particularly affected. Monitoring is necessary to evaluate the long-term effects of the pandemic on adolescents.Implications and ContributionThis study describes the psychological well-being of a population-based sample of adolescents in Geneva, Switzerland amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and identifies adolescents at risk of distress. This study provides further insight by comparing adolescents’ well-being as reported by themselves and their parents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document