Connect: An Effective Community-Based Youth Suicide Prevention Program

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen Bean ◽  
Kristine M. Baber
2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 986-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Walrath ◽  
Lucas Godoy Garraza ◽  
Hailey Reid ◽  
David B. Goldston ◽  
Richard McKeon

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Cantor

I recently heard of a principal who had been enthusiastically promoting a suicide prevention program in his school. The program had been going for two years and was considered effective. It was a small school and I calculated that statistically one suicide might be expected every 15 years. The claim for efficacy regarding suicide prevention seemed premature although the program may have been helpful in other ways.A recent analysis of the efficacy of state initiatives in the USA addressing youth suicide reported encouraging results with most (non-school) initiatives (Lester, 1992). However, with school programs the more students exposed, the greater the increase in youth suicide rates was found. School initiatives in this area seem to have an abundance of enthusiasm and goodwill but have lacked the critical appraisal necessary for success. It is time for enthusiastic chaos to be replaced with more level-headed approaches.


Author(s):  
Mostafa Farahbakhsh ◽  
Hosein Azizi ◽  
Ali Fakhari ◽  
Elham Davtalab Esmaeili ◽  
Habibeh Barzegar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosein azizi ◽  
Ali Fakhari ◽  
Elham Davtalab Esmaeili ◽  
Habibe Barzegar ◽  
Mostafa Farahbakhsh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Since 2013, WHO has had a global mental health action plan which includes reducing suicide rate by 10% in countries by 2020. However, only 18% of countries have a registry for suicide. The community-based Suicide Prevention Program (SPP) statistic is much lower than registry for suicide. Suicide is a growing concern in Iran. A health community assessment found that suicide and Suicidal Behaviors (SBs) are one of the most important public health problems in Malekan County, East Azerbaijan Province of Iran. This calls for a regional SPP effort in Primary Health Care (PHC). Methods: A regional community-based SPP was established during 2014-2017 in two phases including development and implementation. The development phase focuses on three pillars: 1) review of systematic reviews, 2) expert comments, and 3) report to the health care system. The implantation phase also carried out in five steps: 1) improving coverage of SBs registration, 2) identification of determinants of SBs, 3) follow up monitoring of SBs people, 4) treatment for depression and conducting research, and 5) developing public education campaigns. Primary outcome was reducing the rate of completed suicide. Secondary outcomes were considered Suicide Attempt (SA) and re-attempt. Our ultimate goal was considered to lower by 15%, 20% and 30% rates of suicide, SA, and re-attempt, respectively. Discussion : In this study protocol, we have been to outline and explain the steps of developing and implementing a regional community-based SPP by using the highly effective evidence and field expert's comments. Implementing SPP with low cost and easily adaptable in PHC is the most important site for the case management of SBs and materialization of interventions in the health system including various types of health service providers and coverage of a large number of people. This study is both research and action. It needs to involve and support of the health system and inter-sectoral collaborations to achieve the goal of such community-based Health System Research. This HSR was approved to number 60665 in an electronic system (Pajoohan) of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.


Crisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-171
Author(s):  
Carmen C. S. Lai ◽  
Yik Wa Law ◽  
Angie K. Y. Shum ◽  
Flora W. L. Ip ◽  
Paul S. F. Yip

Abstract. Background: A 45-month community-based suicide prevention program was launched in response to the emergence of a suicide cluster in 2010 in Hong Kong. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, document the implementation and outcomes of the project, and identify factors that contribute to the outcomes. Method: The program was delivered following the five key components of the public health approach: (a) community consensus building; (b) surveillance and monitoring; (c) development of coordinated action strategies; (d) interventions development and implementation at the universal, selective, and indicated levels; and (d) program evaluation. Results: A significant decreasing trend of suicide was found in the study site during the intervention period, whereas no changes were found in the three control sites. Spatial analysis also showed that the suicide cluster subsided after the intervention. Three impacts and one challenge of the program were identified from the qualitative feedback of the program stakeholders. Limitations: More investigations should be made to assess the sustainability of this community-based suicide prevention effort in the long run. Conclusion: A community-based suicide prevention program was successfully implemented to address the suicide cluster. A reduction in the suicide rate was observed after the intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document