An evaluation of the relative importance of formulation and process variables using factorial design

1984 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 789-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. M. SANDERSON ◽  
J. W. KENNERLEY ◽  
G. D. PARR
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mutiu Kolade Amosa ◽  
Fatai A. Aderibigbe ◽  
Adewale George Adeniyi ◽  
Joshua O. Ighalo ◽  
Bisola Taibat Bello ◽  
...  

AbstractThe performance of factorial designs is still limited due to some uncertainties that usually intensify process complexities, hence, the need for inter-platform auto-correlation analyses. In this study, the auto-correlation capabilities of factorial designs and General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) on the effects of some pertinent operating variables in wastewater treatment were compared. Individual and combined models were implemented in GAMS and solved with the trio of BARON, CPLEX and IPOPT solvers. It is revealed that adsorbent dosage had the highest effect on the process. It contributed the most effect toward obtaining the minimum silica and TDS contents of 13 mg/L and 814 mg/L, and 13.6 mg/L and 815 mg/L from factorial design and GAMS platforms, respectively. This indicates a concurrence between the results from the two platforms with percentage errors of 4.4% and 0.2% for silica and TDS, respectively. The effects of the mixing speed and contact time are negligible.


Author(s):  
D. A. Farmer ◽  
J. N. Brecker ◽  
M. C. Shaw ◽  
K. Nakayama ◽  
M. C. Shaw

The finish produced in reciprocating surface grinding was studied experimentally and analytically. The 2 n factorial design of experiments technique was applied to determine the relative importance of a large number of variables on the centre-line average (c.l.a.) surface roughness produced without spark-out. The most important variable was found to be table speed which should be low for best finish. The following variables were but one-half to one-third as important as table speed and should be adjusted in the direction indicated for good finish. The peak-to-valley roughness was found to be from four to six times the arithmetic roughness over the entire range of grinding conditions investigated.


2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paramita Mahapatra ◽  
Annapurna Kumari ◽  
Vijay Kumar Garlapati ◽  
Rintu Banerjee ◽  
A. Nag

Author(s):  
Samson W. Wanyonyi ◽  
Ayubu A. Okango ◽  
Julius K. Koech ◽  
Betty C. Korir

In the presence of process variables, a mixture design has become well-known in statistical modeling due to its utility in modeling the blending surface, which empirically predicts any mixture's response and serves as the foundation for optimizing the expected response blends of different components.  In the most common practical situation involving a mixture-process variable, restricted randomization occurs frequently. This problem is solved when the split-plot layout arrangement is used within the constraints. This study's primary goal was to find the best split-plot design (SPD) for the settings mixture-process variables. The SPD was made up of a simplex centroid design (SCD) of four mixture blends and a factorial design with a central composite design (CCD) of the process variable and compared six different context split-plot structure arrangement.  We used JMP software version 15 to create D-optimal split-plot designs. The study compared the constructed designs' relative efficiency using A-, D-, I-, and G- optimality criteria. Furthermore, a graphical technique (fraction of design space plot) was used to display, explain, and evaluate experimental designs' performance in terms of precision of the six designs' variance prediction properties. We discovered that arranging subplots with more SCD points than pure mixture design points within SPD with two high process variables is more helpful and provides more precise parameter estimates. We recommend using SPDs in experiments involving mixture process settings developments to measure the mixture components' interaction effects and the processing conditions. Also, the investigation should be set up at each of the points of a factorial design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document