Mission Failure: America and the World in the Post-Cold War Era

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-175
Author(s):  
James F. Jeffrey
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinay Kaura

Historically, India–Russia cooperation has largely been dictated by geopolitical factors. During the Cold War era, their relationship was defined by their similar strategic perceptions of the world. However, post-Cold War global politics has seen several transformations in geopolitical and geostrategic configurations, influencing the strategic worldview of both New Delhi and Moscow. Recent political trends demonstrate the growing divergence between the strategic approaches of the two states toward various global issues, including Pakistan and the Taliban. The article discusses the implications of the shift in Russia’s South Asia policy as well as India’s counterterrorism efforts.


2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (899) ◽  
pp. 883-886

In recent weeks and months, the issues of nuclear disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation have assumed a new urgency on the world stage. Energetic diplomatic efforts are heralding long overdue progress on nuclear weapons issues in the post-Cold War era.


Author(s):  
Aaron Ettinger

Abstract The close of the Obama presidency prompted considerable thinking about the state of American foreign policy. With the election of Donald Trump, it appeared as if the United States and the world were on the brink of a new relationship. Decades-old language of American international leadership was replaced with a doctrine of America First. In other words, the post–Cold War era had come to an end. This review essay addresses five texts published at this inflection point in American foreign policy history, when the core assumptions are being challenged by domestic and global forces. It accounts for the parlous state of American foreign policy in the post–Cold War era, the causes of foreign policy failure, where the world might be heading, and what it means for American foreign policy scholarship.


1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Pangle

AbstractThe post-Cold War era has provoked a revival of various implicit as well as explicit returns to Stoic cosmopolitan theory as a possible source of a normative conceptual framework for international relations and global community. This article confronts this revival of interest in Stoicism with an analysis of Cicero's constructive critique of original Stoic conceptions of the world community. Particular attention is paid to the arguments by which Cicero identifies major flaws in the Stoic outlook and establishes the validity of his alternative notion of the “law of nations.” It is argued that Cicero's transformation of Stoicism issues in a more modest but more solid, as well as more civic-spirited, cosmopolitan theory. At the same time, the implications of Cicero's arguments for our understanding of justice altogether are clarified.


2019 ◽  
pp. 185-216
Author(s):  
Jeremy Prestholdt

This chapter traces Guevara's unlikely resurgence in the post-Cold War era. The reimagination of Guevara for the new millennium isolated and extended dimensions of his complex profile, and he reemerged in nearly singular form: with long hair and beard, wearing a beret and looking into the distance, an image dubbed "Heroic Guerrilla" ("Guerrillero Heroico"). Through this image Guevara once again became a ubiquitous antiestablishment symbol. For those who were critical of contemporary globalization and domestic repression, he evoked the radicalism of the 1960s and early 1970s. Though Guevara's rebellious aura proved alluring, admirers frequently deemphasized his socialist beliefs. Moreover, as Guevara regained political relevance, he also began to appeal as a commercial, brand-like logo, quickly surpassing similar historical cases. Adaptations of the Heroic Guerrilla appeared on everything from baby clothes to mud flaps, which introduced Guevara to yet wider audiences, including many who embraced him as an antisystemic icon. While Guevara's ideology was excised to a great degree, an often implicit politicality continued to underwrite his potency as a symbol for diverse movements. Therefore, Guevara functioned simultaneously as an apolitical object of consumption, an inspirational symbol for alternative social possibilities, and the most prominent icon of dissent in the world.


Author(s):  
Kaitlyn Rose ◽  
Hanna Samir Kassab

Conflict in nations around the world have often warranted involvement from external actors, either on behalf of or in opposition to the current regime. Foreign military intervention (FMI), regarding the development and evolution of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) over the years, has created power vacuums and destabilized the target states. In the post-Cold War era, intra-state conflict has replaced inter-state conflict as the dominant form of organized violence. In 2014, the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) reported that there were 40 active armed conflicts and 11 of which were labeled as wars, and while the number of armed conflicts in the world has decreased since the end of the Cold War, the number of internationalized armed conflicts is on the rise, giving the impression that the world is becoming ever more violent (Pettersson and Wallensteen, 2015). A fundamental component of liberalism is democratic peace theory, which states that liberal states (democracies) do not go to war with one another. Although democracies do not go to war with one another, this may not make them more peaceful than non-democracies (Navari 2008). This use of military force could further be utilized depending on the regime type of the recipient state, and intervention can be viewed as the new, liberal face of conflict in the post-Cold war era.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document