House sparrow uropygial gland secretions do not attract ornithophilic nor mammophilic mosquitoes

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Díez‐Fernández ◽  
J. Martínez‐de la Puente ◽  
L. Gangoso ◽  
M. Ferraguti ◽  
R. Soriguer ◽  
...  

Ecosistemas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Magallanes Argany ◽  
Luz García-Longoria ◽  
Jaime Muriel ◽  
Florentino de Lope ◽  
Alfonso Marzal


2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. SEITZ

Modernization of agriculture, economic development and population increase after the end of the Thirty Years' War caused authorities in many parts of Germany to decree the eradication of so-called pest animals, including the House Sparrow. Farmers were given targets, and had to deliver the heads of sparrows in proportion to the size of their farms or pay fines. At the end of the eighteenth century German ornithologists argued against the eradication of the sparrows. During the mid-nineteenth century, C. L. Gloger, the pioneer of bird protection in Germany, emphasized the value of the House Sparrow in controlling insect plagues. Many decrees were abolished because either they had not been obeyed, or had resulted in people protecting sparrows so that they always had enough for their “deliveries”. Surprisingly, various ornithologists, including Ernst Hartert and the most famous German bird conservationist Freiherr Berlepsch, joined in the war against sparrows at the beginning of the twentieth century, because sparrows were regarded as competitors of more useful bird species. After the Second World War, sparrows were poisoned in large numbers. Persecution of sparrows ended in Germany in the 1970s. The long period of persecution had a significant but not long-lasting impact on House Sparrow populations, and therefore cannot be regarded as a factor in the recent decline of this species in urban and rural areas of western and central Europe.



2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Lowther ◽  
Calvin L. Cink


Author(s):  
S. Kanasiya ◽  
S. K. Karmore ◽  
S. K. Deshmukh ◽  
R. K. Barhaiya ◽  
S. K. Gupta

The present study was conducted on ten each uropygial glands of 6 to 8 months old healthy Kadaknath and White Leghorn breeds of poultry. The tissue samples were stained by H and E for normal histological structures, Verhoeff’s stain for collagen and elastic fibers, PAS (Periodic Acid Schiff’s) for glycogen and Alcian Blue PAS method for acid mucopolysaccharides. The uropygial gland in Kadaknath and White Leghorn was composed of two lobes. Each lobe had a single duct and these ducts were joined together by isthmus. The thickness of capsule was more in White Leghorn than Kadaknath breed. The lumen of tubules showed higher concentration of secretary product in Kadaknath breed. Numbers of tubules were higher in Kadaknath. No aggregation of lymphocytes was found in the preen gland of White Leghorn, whereas in Kadaknath, there was large number of lymphocytes aggregation alongwith lymphatic nodules. Melanin pigmentation was the characteristic feature of Kadaknath which was found towards the central cavity and in between ductules. The capsule of White Leghorn showed intense PAS activity, while moderate activity was found in Kadaknath breed of poultry. Intense ACPase reaction was noticed in capsule of uropygial gland of Kadaknath and White Leghorn breeds of poultry.



1878 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 499-505
Author(s):  
Elliott Coues
Keyword(s):  


1977 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald S. Farner ◽  
Richard S. Donham ◽  
Robert A. Lewis ◽  
Philip W. Mattocks ◽  
Thomas R. Darden ◽  
...  


1985 ◽  
Vol 260 (29) ◽  
pp. 15953-15958
Author(s):  
A J Poulose ◽  
L Rogers ◽  
T M Cheesbrough ◽  
P E Kolattukudy




2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 85-89
Author(s):  
Jung-Chin Chang ◽  
Fang-Yi Tsai ◽  
Yu-Shing Lee ◽  
Ruo-Chan Wang ◽  
Ju-Pai Kao ◽  
...  

A five-year-old female cockatiel weighing 117 g was presented with a fast-growing mass beside the uropygial gland. Excisional biopsy was performed and the mass measured [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]cm in size and weighed 30.6 g. On the surface of cut sections, the mass was yellow-brown with white or yellow colloidal substances and red exudate. Histopathology showed that the tumor mass was covered by the skin and located in the deep dermis and hypodermis. The tumor consisted of abundant vascular adipose tissue and lipoblasts with intracytoplasmic lipid droplets, which varied in size. Also, small, well-differentiated blood vessels, with varied degrees of congestion and dilation, were observed within the tumor. Histochemically, staining with Oil red O produced a positive reaction in which the lipid droplets presented a reddish color. Immunohistochemistry produced positive staining for Desmin and successfully marked the muscular layers of blood vessels. On the basis of these results, a rare case of liposarcoma with microvascular proliferation adjacent to the uropygial gland was diagnosed in a cockatiel.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document