Driving working memory with frequency-tuned noninvasive brain stimulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 1423 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Albouy ◽  
Sylvain Baillet ◽  
Robert J. Zatorre
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

Dual-mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Prefrontal Cortices on Working Memory in Stroke Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 359
Author(s):  
Ahee Lee ◽  
Won Hyuk Chang ◽  
Min Ji Lee ◽  
Min-Su Kim ◽  
Yun-Hee Kim
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Dual Mode ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation ◽  
Prefrontal Cortices

Elucidating and Modulating the Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Working Memory via Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Juan ◽  
Philip Tseng ◽  
Tzu-Yu Hsu
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Posterior Parietal Cortex ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation ◽  
Memory Mechanism ◽  
Posterior Parietal

Visuospatial working memory refers to the short-term memory mechanism that enables humans to remember visual information across visual blackout periods such as eyeblinks or eye movements. In recent years, neuroscientific studies have made great progress in uncovering the brain regions that support visuospatial working memory. In this review, we focus on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in forming and maintaining visual information, and use it as an example to highlight how noninvasive brain-stimulation techniques, particularly transcranial magnetic, direct current, and alternating current stimulation, can shed light on this topic because of their unique strengths in modulating brain activities.

scholarly journals Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with exercise in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-412
Author(s):  
Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas ◽  
Kevin Pacheco-Barrios ◽  
Stefano Giannoni-Luza ◽  
Oscar Rivera-Torrejon ◽  
Felipe Fregni
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

Noninvasive brain stimulation for patients with a disorder of consciousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Feng ◽  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Zhongfei Bai ◽  
Ying Yin
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation ◽  
Disorder Of Consciousness ◽  
Left Dlpfc ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal ◽  
Minimally Conscious

AbstractNoninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been used to facilitate the recovery from prolonged unconsciousness as a result of brain injury. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the effects of NIBS in patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOC). We searched four databases for any randomized controlled trials on the effect of NIBS in patients with a DOC, which used the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) as the primary outcome measure. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect sizes. Fourteen studies with 273 participants were included in this review, of which 12 studies with sufficient data were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed a significant effect on increasing CRS-R scores in favor of real stimulation as compared to sham (Hedges’ g = 0.522; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.318–0.726; P < 0.0001, I2 = 0.00%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that only anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) significantly enhances the CRS-R scores in patients with a DOC, as compared to sham (Hedges’ g = 0.703; 95% CI, 0.419–0.986; P < 0.001), and this effect was predominant in patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) (Hedges’ g = 0.815; 95% CI, 0.429–1.200; P < 0.001). Anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC appears to be an effective approach for patients with MCS.

scholarly journals The effect of noninvasive brain stimulation on neural connectivity in Tinnitus: A randomized trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 1201-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren T. Roland ◽  
Jonathan E. Peelle ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Joyce Nicklaus ◽  
Jay F. Piccirillo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Neural Connectivity ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation

scholarly journals Rethinking the thinking cap: Ethics of neural enhancement using noninvasive brain stimulation

Neurology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hamilton ◽  
S. Messing ◽  
A. Chatterjee
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document