The function of expert involvement in China's local policy making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongdong Shen ◽  
Meng U. Ieong ◽  
Zihang Zhu
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
pp. 200-224
Author(s):  
Peter Malpass ◽  
Alan Murie
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 107808742094460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Christian van Eck

With the advancement of comparative studies within the field of immigration and sociopolitical movements, scholars have attempted to understand how politico-institutional contexts influence the mobilization strategies of immigrant rights organizations at the local level. In this article, I make use of a field approach to explain how these organizations face different group-and issue-specific conditions regarding their involvement in local policy-making processes. Empirically, I examine the advocacy work of immigrant rights organizations in their aim to protect the rights of undocumented immigrants in Boston (USA) and Amsterdam (the Netherlands). By approaching power and resistance as relational phenomena, the results indicate that the intersection of distinct institutional and organizational mechanisms has differently impacted the local fields of immigrant politics. Taking different routes, in both cities immigrant rights organizations have found ways to constitute an affirmative institutional and discursive counterpower that challenges the national exclusionary citizenship regimes from the ground.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 293-302
Author(s):  
Slađana Pavlinović Mršić ◽  
Anita Stojan

A case of managing a public utility in post-transitional context is elaborated in this paper. The aim is to identify main determinants of household recycling, in order to make recommendations for design of appropriate recycling policy in Split (Croatia). Based on the overview of relevant literature, individual motivation towards waste selection is explored and preliminary survey results are presented. Implications for local policy-making and management of local public utilities are discussed.


Evaluation ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Saraceno
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 860-877
Author(s):  
José Luis Fernández-Martínez ◽  
Maite López-Sánchez ◽  
Juan Antonio Rodríguez Aguilar ◽  
Dionisio Sánchez Rubio ◽  
Berenice Zambrano Nemegyei

In the context of a citizen lab, this article describes how a vanguard of activists, designers, scholars and participation practitioners were involved in a participatory prototyping process. CoGovern was designed as an online participation tool whose focus is to incorporate citizen preferences in local policy making. It is aimed at supporting informed and transparent participatory processes while reducing the ability of sponsoring authorities to “cherry-pick” policy proposals and avoid providing explanations. This article proposes a decision-making process that incorporates artificial intelligence techniques into a collective decision process and whose result is mainly based on standard optimization techniques rather than vote-counting.


Author(s):  
Ling Chen ◽  
Ling Chen

This chapter delves into the coalitional politics of policy making and resource allocation by investigating strategies of city government officials. The chapter examines the patterns of bureaucratic competition between international commerce departments and newly emerged domestic technology departments and their respective business clients, including foreign and domestic firms. I explain the influence of FDI attraction on domestic politics by showing (1) how the overlap between FIEs and exporters shaped the degree of perceived threat and the cohesiveness of the vested interests in international commerce under the rule of fragmented bureaucratic competition and (2) how the existence of large foreign firms strengthened the bargaining power of the vested interest bureaucrats against allocating resources to the domestic technology coalition. The direction and the magnitude of foreign influence, therefore, is filtered and channeled through local bureaucracy.


1979 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Peterson

Two models of local policy formation can be set forth. Although they are complementary rather than competing models, for heuristic purposes it is useful to present them as contrasting approaches. Since the first, the bargaining model, is well known, I shall concentrate in this paper on elaborating and applying a second, unitary model of policy making. The paper is divided into four main parts. After briefly identifying the limitations of the bargaining model, the first part develops the theoretical rationale for the unitary model. The second part uses the model to analyse empirically differences in the revenue sources for national, state and local governments. Part 3 does the same for expenditure policies, and, in the course of the analysis, distinguishes among three types of public policy – developmental, allocational and redistributive. In the final part, hypotheses deduced from the model are tested by means of a regression analysis of state and local expenditures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document