scholarly journals P9‐42: Impact of an asthma shared care service on hospital attendances and admissions

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 379-379
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A Klinger ◽  
Doris Howell ◽  
Denise Marshall ◽  
David Zakus ◽  
Kevin Brazil ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1964.1-1964
Author(s):  
C. Yin Shuen ◽  
N. Woon Leung ◽  
L. Man Chi ◽  
L. Chi Kwai ◽  
C. Ching Man ◽  
...  

Background:Rheumatic diseases are immune-mediated disorders that affect the musculoskeletal system, soft tissues, blood vessels and connective tissue. Patients with rheumatic diseases need regular follow up for disease and drug toxicity monitoring. To cope with the increasing service demand, the Division of Rheumatology in the United Christian Hospital developed and expanded the shared care service. In the conventional practice, patients have to been seen by rheumatologist for every visit while the shared care service involved follow up by rheumatologist and rheumatology nurse in alternate sessions.Objectives:1.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the shared cared service2To evaluate the effectiveness of reduction in workload of rheumatology clinicMethods:This is a retrospective study involving the period from 1/1/2019 to 31/12/2019. Patients who attended the rheumatology nurse clinic for shared care were recruited and reviewed. All patients were selected and referred by rheumatologists. Criteria for shared care included regular follow up in rheumatology clinic and stable clinical condition. The length of follow up is adjusted according to patient condition. Services provided by rheumatology nurse (RhN) included disease education, drug and disease monitoring, drug advice and referral to other professionals and community service as indicated. During each visit, patient’s vital signs, disease activity and laboratory results were assessed according to standard protocol. RhN will make discharge record to ensure continuity of care.Results:Totally 489 episodes of attendance to nurse led clinic were recruited. Majority (97.3%) were arthritis patients. Others included lupus, vasculitis, Sjogren’s syndrome and miscellaneous conditions. The length of follow up ranged from 3 weeks to 24 weeks and most of the patients were follow up between 8 to 16 weeks. Shared care patients included those with stable disease for interval monitoring, and patients for drug initiation and titration. The ratio for disease monitoring and drug monitoring are 41.3% and 58.7% respectively.For the 489 episodes of attendance, 10 (2%) episodes needed rheumatologist intervention and 8 (1.6%) cases need advancement of follow up. Problems that required doctor interventions and advance follow up mainly are suboptimal disease control requiring medication adjustment or musculoskeletal ultrasound investigation.178 (36.4%) episodes of nursing intervention were delivered, majority were medication advice (133, 27.2%). Reasons for nursing intervention included adverse drug reaction, abnormal investigation results, poor drug adherence and disease flare up. There were no emergency department attendance or admission related to rheumatic problems within one month of RhN follow up.Conclusion:The shared care service is smooth and can safely lengthen the follow-up intervals to reduce clinic visit burden in rheumatology clinic. RhN input also allowed prompt advice for steroid tapering and dose titration for disease specific medication for better disease control. Proper case selection and close collaboration between rheumatologist and rheumatology nurse is the key.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joice Lourenço da Silva ◽  
Elen Ferraz Teston ◽  
Sonia Silva Marcon ◽  
Bianca Cristina Ciccone Giacon Arruda ◽  
Adriana Roese Ramos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: to understand how health professionals perceive the shared care between the teams of Primary Health Care and Home Care Service. Method: descriptive study, with a qualitative approach, carried out with 17 professionals, in the municipality of Campo Grande, MS. Data were collected from August to October 2019, through semi-structured audio-recorded interviews and submitted to content analysis. Results: lack of knowledge, lack of qualification, lack of ordering of care and weakness in counter-referral were some of the challenges mentioned for shared care. However, interinstitutional visits, communication, discussion of cases, action planning, were perceived as strategies to carry it out. Final considerations: professionals perceive that home care is permeated by limitations and weaknesses in relation to the effectuation of shared care between the different health teams.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-82
Author(s):  
NANCY A. MELVILLE
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (03) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. G. Dietz ◽  
A. Hasman ◽  
P. F. de Vries Robbé ◽  
H. J. Tange

Summary Objectives: Many shared-care projects feel the need for electronic patient-record (EPR) systems. In absence of practical experiences from paper record keeping, a theoretical model is the only reference for the design of these systems. In this article, we review existing models of individual clinical practice and integrate their useful elements. We then present a generic model of clinical practice that is applicable to both individual and collaborative clinical practice. Methods: We followed the principles of the conversation-for-action theory and the DEMO method. According to these principles, information can only be generated by a conversation between two actors. An actor is a role that can be played by one or more human subjects, so the model does not distinguish between inter-individual and intra-individual conversations. Results: Clinical practice has been divided into four actors: service provider, problem solver, coordinator, and worker. Each actor represents a level of clinical responsibility. Any information in the patient record is the result of a conversation between two of these actors. Connecting different conversations to one another can create a process view with meta-information about the rationale of clinical practice. Such process view can be implemented as an extension to the EPR. Conclusions: The model has the potential to cover all professional activities, but needs to be further validated. The model can serve as a theoretical basis for the design of EPR-systems for shared care, but a successful EPR-system needs more than just a theoretical model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document