Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues

Risk Analysis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1770-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Graham ◽  
John A. Rupp ◽  
Olga Schenk
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 542
Author(s):  
Joe Collins ◽  
Ian Cockerill ◽  
Zain Rasheed

Rising gas prices in the eastern Australian gas market, as well as forecast supply shortages in years to come, are driving speculation about LNG import requirements for the market. There are significant similarities with the gas market experience in the USA in the early 2000s which led to the construction of many LNG import terminals, the parallel rise of unconventional gas production and the subsequent mothballing of the LNG import facilities at huge economic cost. A comprehensive east coast gas market study has been carried out based on the 2P reserves positions for domestic gas producers. This data has been paired with a range of gas demand forecasts to identify the probable supply gap on the east coast over the next 10 years. A market response to the high gas pricing in the form of new developments is already underway. In a separate paper (Part 1) all potential domestic sources of unconventional gas to fill that gap were analysed to determine likely gas supply rates, development schedules and breakeven supply costs for each of the major demand centres. This paper (Part 2) illustrates the required gas prices to drive unconventional gas development in Australia, the subsequent scale of new unconventional gas supplies to the forecast gaps in the market and describes how those developments can reverse the trend of rising prices over time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e004068
Author(s):  
Po Man Tsang ◽  
Audrey Prost

BackgroundMany countries aiming to suppress SARS-CoV-2 recommend the use of face masks by the general public. The social meanings attached to masks may influence their use, but remain underinvestigated.MethodsWe systematically searched eight databases for studies containing qualitative data on public mask use during past epidemics, and used meta-ethnography to explore their social meanings. We compared key concepts within and across studies, then jointly wrote a critical synthesis.ResultsWe found nine studies from China (n=5), Japan (n=1), Mexico (n=1), South Africa (n=1) and the USA (n=1). All studies describing routine mask use during epidemics were from East Asia. Participants identified masks as symbols of solidarity, civic responsibility and an allegiance to science. This effect was amplified by heightened risk perception (eg, during SARS in 2003), and by seeing masks on political leaders and in outdoor public spaces. Masks also acted as containment devices to manage threats to identity at personal and collective levels. In China and Japan, public and corporate campaigns framed routine mask use as individual responsibility for disease prevention in return for state- or corporate-sponsored healthcare access. In most studies, mask use waned as risk perception fell. In contexts where masks were mostly worn by patients with specific diseases (eg, for patients with tuberculosis in South Africa), or when trust in government was low (eg, during H1N1 in Mexico), participants described masks as stigmatising, uncomfortable or oppressive.ConclusionFace masks can take on positive social meanings linked to solidarity and altruism during epidemics. Unfortunately, these positive meanings can fail to take hold when risk perception falls, rules are seen as complex or unfair, and trust in government is low. At such times, ensuring continued use is likely to require additional efforts to promote locally appropriate positive social meanings, simplifying rules for use and ensuring fair enforcement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 491
Author(s):  
Cameron R. Huddlestone-Holmes ◽  
Kate Holland ◽  
Luk J. M. Peeters

The Australian Government’s $35.4 million Geological and Bioregional Assessment (GBA) Program is assessing the potential impacts of shale, tight and deep coal gas development on water and the environment in the Beetaloo, Isa and Cooper GBA regions. This paper compares the outcomes of impact assessments for the Beetaloo and Cooper GBA regions, highlighting the role that local geology, hydrogeology, ecology and regulatory regimes play when assessing potential impacts of unconventional gas development. Unconventional gas development activities between basins are broadly consistent, involving drilling, stimulation of the reservoir (typically through hydraulic fracturing), production and processing of hydrocarbons, export to market and decommissioning and rehabilitation. The characteristics of these activities and their potential impacts are strongly influenced by local factors including the geology, environment, industry practices and regulatory regimes. While subsurface impacts associated with hydraulic fracturing and well integrity are considered unlikely in both regions, regional geology means there is greater stratigraphic separation between target resources and overlying aquifers in the Beetaloo Sub-basin than in the Cooper Basin. Local ecological conditions and species influence the nature of potential impacts on protected matters in the two basins, which are mostly associated with surface disturbance and spills or accidental release of fluids. A key similarity between the two regions is the broadly consistent regulation and management of potential impacts in the two basins. Preliminary results of the causal network analysis indicate that mitigation measures are available for all pathways in which unconventional gas resource development activities may have the potential to impact on endpoints.


2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Goldstein ◽  
Anthony Hill ◽  
Michael Malavazos ◽  
Sandra Menpes ◽  
Alexandra Wickham ◽  
...  

If a fraction of the national potential to produce unconventional gas is realised, then Australia will benefit: security of domestic and export gas supplies for decades to come; supply-side competition for decades to come; improved balance of trade and transport fuel security as Australia's supplants imports with gas-based transport fuel; billions of dollars invested in environmentally sustainable projects; thousands of jobs; considerable royalties and tax for revenues public good; and, world-class intellectual property that can be converted into export services and equipment. Given these drivers, the SA State Government convened a Roundtable for Unconventional Gas Projects in October 2010. Participating in this roundtable are a total of 260 organisations plus individuals, including: peak representative bodies focused on economic, social, and natural environment outcomes; and, companies, universities, and key agencies from all state, NT, and commonwealth governments. This roundtable informed a Roadmap for Unconventional Gas Projects in South Australia that was published in December 2012. The objectives of this roadmap are to credibly inform industry strategies, government policies, and public perceptions. In particular, this roadmap explains how people and enterprises potentially affected by unconventional gas operations are given information and time to draw considered views so their rights to object in part or full to activity—and location-specific land access—are supported. This will facilitate the efficient, profitable, and welcomed deployment of capital, technologies, and infrastructure for the commercialisation of unconventional gas. This extended abstract details the findings of this roadmap.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document