Risk Factors Proximate to Suicide and Suicide Risk Assessment in the Context of Denied Suicide Ideation

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan L. Berman
Author(s):  
L. Gelda ◽  
L. Nesterovich

The problem of adequate diagnostic tools use for suicide risk assessment т medical research and practice is of extreme importance because of the high incidence of suicide in the population of psychotic patients and the high vulnerability of the latter to the known risk factors. The article provides ап overview of the existing psychometric instruments (scales) used to assess the risk of suicide in psychiatry as well as in general medicine.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622098403
Author(s):  
Marianne Wyder ◽  
Manaan Kar Ray ◽  
Samara Russell ◽  
Kieran Kinsella ◽  
David Crompton ◽  
...  

Introduction: Risk assessment tools are routinely used to identify patients at high risk. There is increasing evidence that these tools may not be sufficiently accurate to determine the risk of suicide of people, particularly those being treated in community mental health settings. Methods: An outcome analysis for case serials of people who died by suicide between January 2014 and December 2016 and had contact with a public mental health service within 31 days prior to their death. Results: Of the 68 people who had contact, 70.5% had a formal risk assessment. Seventy-five per cent were classified as low risk of suicide. None were identified as being at high risk. While individual risk factors were identified, these did not allow to differentiate between patients classified as low or medium. Discussion: Risk categorisation contributes little to patient safety. Given the dynamic nature of suicide risk, a risk assessment should focus on modifiable risk factors and safety planning rather than risk prediction. Conclusion: The prediction value of suicide risk assessment tools is limited. The risk classifications of high, medium or low could become the basis of denying necessary treatment to many and delivering unnecessary treatment to some and should not be used for care allocation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Ximena Rangel-Garzón ◽  
María Fernanda Suárez-Beltrán ◽  
Franklin Escobar-Córdoba

<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Antecedentes.</strong> El médico de atención primaria debe decidir qué hacer con un paciente que ha atentado contra su vida o manifiesta ideación suicida. Posiblemente puede interconsultar a psiquiatría; sin embargo, ocasionalmente esto se difiere. </span></p><p class="p1"><strong>Objetivo.</strong> Encontrar un instrumento de evaluación del riesgo suicida en adultos que pueda ser aplicado por el médico general en el servicio de urgencias.</p><p class="p1"><strong>Materiales y métodos.</strong> Revisión de la literatura en PubMed con los términos MeSH: ‘suicide’, ‘risk assessment’ y ‘scales’; se encontraron 270 artículos a los que se les analizaron los abstract y finalmente se incluyeron 24 estudios. </p><p class="p1"><strong>Resultados.</strong> Se encontraron nueve instrumentos y se descartaron los demás por involucrar diagnóstico específico, grupos de edad distintos, poblaciones específicas diferentes, tiempo prolongado de aplicación y otros determinantes enfocados en los factores protectores y en opiniones del paciente acerca del suicidio.  </p><p class="p1"><span class="s2"><strong>Conclusiones. </strong>Estas escalas se pueden usar como instrumento de ayuda para definir una conducta en un paciente con riesgo suicida, pero no reemplazan la entrevista psiquiátrica. Se postulan las escalas Modified Scale for Suicide Ideation y Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale por cumplir con las características psicométricas, por tener un tiempo de aplicación adecuado en el servicio de urgencias y por sus preguntas sencillas para ser utilizadas en atención primaria.</span></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 608-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Alyami ◽  
Hussain Alyami ◽  
Frederick Sundram ◽  
Gary Cheung ◽  
Beverly A Haarhoff ◽  
...  

Objective: Suicide risk assessment is variably taught and learnt by health professionals. The literature indicates that training programs of this fundamental competency need to be enhanced. To facilitate teaching and learning of this core clinical skill, we propose a novel visual metaphor in order to conceptualize suicide risk factors. The design of the proposed visual metaphor was informed by the Cognitive Load Theory to enhance deep learning of the various suicide risk factors. Conclusion: The visual metaphor depicting suicide risk factors can potentially improve memory and recall. It activates prior knowledge and is based on educational theory informed design principles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Berardelli ◽  
Elena Rogante ◽  
Salvatore Sarubbi ◽  
Denise Erbuto ◽  
David Lester ◽  
...  

Suicide is a cause of early mortality in nearly 5% of patients with schizophrenia, and 25–50% of patients with schizophrenia attempt suicide in their lifetime. Evidence points to numerous individual, clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for suicide in patients with schizophrenia. Although recognizing suicidal risk factors in schizophrenia is extremely important in suicidal risk assessment, we have recently witnessed a change in suicide risk management that shifts the focus from suicide risk assessment to suicide risk formulation. Suicide risk formulation is dependent on the data gathered in the suicide risk assessment and assigns a level of suicide risk that is indispensable for the choice of treatment and the management of patients with a high suicidal risk. In this article, we extend the suicide risk formulation model to patients with schizophrenia. Suicide risk formulation results from four different areas that help clinicians collect as much information as possible for the management of suicidal risk. The four distinct judgments comprise risk status (the risk relating to the specific group to which the patient belongs), risk state (the risk for the person compared with his baseline or another reference point in the course of his life), available resources (on whom the person can count during a crisis) and foreseeable events (which can exacerbate the crisis). In schizophrenia, the suicide risk formulation model allows the clinician to evaluate in depth the clinical context of the patient, the patient's own history and patient-specific opportunities for better choosing and applying suicide prevention strategies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S562-S562
Author(s):  
N. Alavi ◽  
T. Reshetukha ◽  
E. Prost ◽  
A. Kristen ◽  
D. Groll

IntroductionSuicidal behaviour remains the most common reason for presentation to the emergency rooms. In spite of identifiable risk factors, suicide remains essentially unpredictable by current tools and assessments. Moreover, some factors may not be included consistently in the suicidal risk assessments in the emergency room by either emergency medicine physicians or psychiatrists.MethodStep 1 involved the administration of a survey on the importance of suicide predictors for assessment between psychiatry and emergency medicine specialties. In step 2 a chart review of psychiatric emergency room patients in Kingston, Canada was conducted to determine suicide predictor documentation rates. In step 3, based on the result of the first 2 steps a suicide risk assessment tool (Suicide RAP [Risk Assessment Prompt]) was developed and presented to both teams. A second patient chart review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the educational intervention and suicide RAP in suicide risk assessment.ResultsSignificant differences were found in the rating of importance and the documentation rates of suicide predictors between the two specialties. Several predictors deemed important, have low documentation rates. Thirty of the suicide predictors showed increased rates of documentation after the educational intervention and the presentation of the suicide RAP.ConclusionThough a surfeit of information regarding patient risk factors for suicide is available, clinicians and mental health professionals face difficulties in integrating and applying this information to individuals. Based on the result of this study suicide RAP and educational intervention could be helpful in improving the suicidal risk assessment.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-159
Author(s):  
Franci Crepeau-Hobson ◽  
James Estes

This study examined the effectiveness of a suicide prevention program that provides free and accessible counseling services to suicidal youth. Children and adolescents who underwent a suicide risk assessment at a Colorado school (n = 99) were referred for counseling through the Second Wind Fund (SWF), a non-profit organization dedicated to the prevention of youth suicide. Each of these clients presented with at least 1 barrier to treatment such as no or inadequate insurance or lack of transportation. Through SWF, clients received up to 12 counseling sessions at no charge. Clients ranged from 8 to 18 years of age. Of the 99 clients, 93 completed the Suicide Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-Jr) at the beginning and end of treatment. Results indicated that SIQ-Jr scores were significantly lower at the end of treatment. Follow-up surveys were sent to referral sources at the end of the subsequent school year to examine longer-term effectiveness of SWF services. The majority of clients did not require any additional intervention and none went on to die by suicide. Study results indicate that the removal of financial and social barriers can increase access to and participation in treatment and reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Implications for practice, including suicide risk assessment and outside referrals are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document