A multi‐center evaluation of hepatitis B reactivation with and without antiviral prophylaxis after kidney transplantation

Author(s):  
Suhail A Shaikh ◽  
Jeffrey Kahn ◽  
Andraea Aksentijevic ◽  
Pnada Kawewat‐Ho ◽  
Alexandra Bixby ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. S149-S150
Author(s):  
Z. Hassoun ◽  
B. Kabamba ◽  
C. Maréchal ◽  
E. Goffin ◽  
N. Kanaan


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e243526
Author(s):  
Branko Borojevic ◽  
Ayushi Chauhan ◽  
Scott Patterson

A 93-year-old man was admitted with 1 week of frank jaundice and abdominal pain. His medical history included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunomycin, oncovin and prednisolone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy 10 months prior. His investigations revealed marked hyperbilirubinemia with a total bilirubin of 355 μmol/L, along with a 17-fold elevation in alanine transaminase and impaired hepatic synthetic function. He tested hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) negative, hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive and had elevated hepatitis B virus DNA level at 13 691 IU/L. This was in the setting of radiological evidence of suspected cirrhosis. He was later found to have tested positive for HBcAb and negative for HBsAg and HBsAb prior to chemotherapy, but had not received antiviral prophylaxis. He was diagnosed with fulminant hepatitis secondary to delayed hepatitis B reactivation in the setting of rituximab. Hepatitis B reactivation and the role of screening and antiviral prophylaxis in isolated HBcAb-positive patients is reviewed.



2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 739-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihye Kim ◽  
Se Jin Chung ◽  
Dong Hyun Sinn ◽  
Kyo Won Lee ◽  
Jae Berm Park ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Kanaan ◽  
Benoit Kabamba ◽  
Céline Maréchal ◽  
Yves Pirson ◽  
Claire Beguin ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhan Lee ◽  
Jun Yong Park ◽  
Deok Gie Kim ◽  
Jee Youn Lee ◽  
Beom Seok Kim ◽  
...  




2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S347-S348
Author(s):  
I Ergenç ◽  
H T Kani ◽  
M Karabacak ◽  
E Cömert Özer ◽  
S Mehdiyev ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biologic agents are widely used in immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). The risk and consequences of hepatitis B reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative phase of hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposed patients is not clear. We aim to investigate the reactivation rate in biologic exposed patients within surface antigen negative phase of HBV infection. Methods We identified patients followed up at gastroenterology, rheumatology and dermatology out-patient clinics with a diagnosis of IMID from clinical charts. Patients exposed to biologic agents with a negative HBsAg and positive Anti-HBc IgG were included. Primary outcome was HBV reactivation, which was defined as reverse seroconversion of HBsAg. Results We screened 8266 IMID patients and 2484 of them were exposed to biologic agents. A total of 221 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 54.08 ± 11.69 years and 115 (52.0%) patients were female. The median number of different biologic subtype use was 1 (range: 1 – 6). The mean biologic agent exposure time was 55 (range: 2 – 179) months. One hundred and fifty-two (68.8%) patients were using concomitant immunomodulatory agents and 84 (38.0%) patients were exposed to corticosteroids during biologic use. No hepatitis B reactivation with a reverse seroconversion of HBsAg positivity was observed in the whole cohort. Antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis B was given to 48 (21.7%) patients with entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine. HBV-DNA was screened in 56 (25.3%) patients prior to the biologic exposure. Two patients had HBV-DNA reactivation with a negative HBsAg during exposure to the biologic agent. Conclusion Though only 21.7% of our patients used prophylaxis, we found only two reactivations (1%) and no HBsAg seroconversion in our cohort. Our results suggest a re-assessment of antiviral prophylaxis for anti-HBc Ag (+) patients exposed to biologic agents. Current guidelines would be updated in the light of future studies.





2016 ◽  
pp. 74-80
Author(s):  
Phuong Phung ◽  
Thi Thuy Nguyen

ackground and Objectives: Nowadays, the incidence of cancer is constantly increasing in the world as well as in Vietnam. The treatment of cancer is based on multimodality principle. Among those principal modalities, chemotherapy is widely used for different purposes such as neoadjuvant, andjuvant and palliation. However, chemotherapy can induce activation of latent infections, including hepatitis B. Vietnam is in the endemic region of hepatitis B so the reactivation of hepatitis B on cancer patients with chemotherapy has emerged a concerned problem. However, few interests were gained on this problem in the aspect of clinical setting or researching. Aims: to determine the prevalence of hepatitis B reactivation (HBV) in cancer patients treating with chemotherapy and to detect some risks factors of this situation. Subjects and methods: descriptive prospective. The study included 33 cancer patients with inactive HBV infection who are treating with chemotherapy. We define HBV reactivation by ALT > 3 ULN and HBV DNA copies > 10 positive control limit. Results: We found 6 patients with reactivated HBV, accounting for 18.18 %. Among reactivated HBV patients, age less than 60 accounts 83,33%. Rate of reactivated HBV in males was 25,00% while this rate in females was 14,28%. Rate of reactivated HBV in lymphoma, lung cancer and breast cancer was 33,33%, 25% và 22,22% respectively. Clinial manifestation of reactivated HBV includes jaundice (33,33%), fulminant hepatic failure (6%) and death (5%). The reactivated rate was higher in patients got high dose of corticoid (28,57%) vs low dose (15,38%). This rate was 29,41% in patients treated with anthracyclines which was higher than in group without anthracyclines. The reactivated rate of HBV was dramatically higher in patients treated with rituximab (75%). Conclusion: the reactivation of hepatitis B on cancer patients with chemotherapy is common. We found 6 patients with reactivated HBV of 33 subjects of the study which accounts 18.18 %. We recognized that reactivated HBV rate was higher subgroups of age < 60 years old, males, patients with lymphoma, lung cancer, breast cancer. Reactivated HBV may be more prevalent in patients with high-dose corticotherapy, anthracyclines and Rituximab. Key words: HBV reactivation, chemotherapy, cancer, hepatitis B



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document