Does Simulation Training for Acute Care Nurses Improve Patient Safety Outcomes: A Systematic Review to Inform Evidence‐Based Practice

BACKGROUND Patients commonly transition between health care settings, requiring care providers to transfer medication utilization information. Yet, information sharing about adverse drug events (ADEs) remains nonstandardized. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe a minimum required dataset for clinicians to document and communicate ADEs to support clinical decision making and improve patient safety. METHODS We used mixed-methods analysis to design a minimum required dataset for ADE documentation and communication. First, we completed a systematic review of the existing ADE reporting systems. After synthesizing reporting concepts and data fields, we conducted fieldwork to inform the design of a preliminary reporting form. We presented this information to clinician end-user groups to establish a recommended dataset. Finally, we pilot-tested and refined the dataset in a paper-based format. RESULTS We evaluated a total of 1782 unique data fields identified in our systematic review that describe the reporter, patient, ADE, and suspect and concomitant drugs. Of these, clinicians requested that 26 data fields be integrated into the dataset. Avoiding the need to report information already available electronically, reliance on prospective rather than retrospective causality assessments, and omitting fields deemed irrelevant to clinical care were key considerations. CONCLUSIONS By attending to the information needs of clinicians, we developed a standardized dataset for adverse drug event reporting. This dataset can be used to support communication between care providers and integrated into electronic systems to improve patient safety. If anonymized, these standardized data may be used for enhanced pharmacovigilance and research activities.

Download Full-text

THE IMPACT OF BARCODE MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ON PATIENT SAFETY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies ◽

10.32553/ijmbs.v5i6.1951 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (6) ◽

Author(s):

Seham Sahal Aloufi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Patient Safety ◽

Medication Error ◽

Medication Errors ◽

Improve Patient Safety ◽

Hospital Setting ◽

Medication Administration ◽

Bar Code ◽

The Impact ◽

Improve Patient

Patient safety is considered as an essential feature of healthcare system. Many trials have been conducted in order to find ways to improve patient safety, and many reports indicate that medication errors pose a threat to patient safety. Thus, some studies have investigated the impact of bar code medication administration (BCMA) system on medication error reduction during the medication administration procedure. This systematic review (SR) reports the impact of BCMA system on reducing medication errors to improve patient safety; it also compares traditional medication administration with the BCMA system. The review concentrates on the effectiveness of BCMA technology on medication administration errors, and on the accuracy of medication administration. This review also focused on different designs of quantitative studies, as they are more effective at investigating the impact of the intervention than qualitative studies. The findings from this systematic review show various results depending on the nature of the hospital setting. Most of the studies agree that the BCMA system enhances compliance with the 'five rights’' requirement (right drug, right patient, right dose, right time and right route) of medication administration. In addition, BCMA technology identified medication error types that could not be identified with the traditional approach which is applying the 'five rights' of medication administration. The findings of this systematic review also confirm the impact of BCMA system in reducing medication error, preventing adverse events and increasing the accuracy of the medication administration rate. However, BCMA technology did not consistently reduce the overall errors of medication administration. Keyword: Patient Safety, Impact, BCMA, eMAR

Download Full-text

Comparison of 3 Dilation and Evacuation Technical Skills Models

Journal of Graduate Medical Education ◽

10.4300/jgme-d-13-00049.1 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 662-664 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maureen K. Baldwin ◽

Julie Chor ◽

Beatrice A. Chen ◽

Alison B. Edelman ◽

Jennefer Russo

Keyword(s):

Patient Safety ◽

Family Medicine ◽

Simulation Training ◽

Improve Patient Safety ◽

Technical Skills ◽

Training Model ◽

Second Trimester ◽

Fidelity Model ◽

Improve Patient ◽

And Training

Abstract Background Simulation training may improve patient safety, decrease trainer and trainee anxiety, and reduce the number of cases needed for competency. Complications associated with dilation and evacuation (D&E) have been directly related to provider skill level, yet no low-fidelity model has been formally described or evaluated in the literature for second-trimester D&E training. Objective We report physicians' assessments of the realism of 3 D&E models to establish a composite training model. Methods We surveyed experienced providers at 2 national conferences to evaluate 3 D&E models and rate each model's components on a Likert scale. Results Fifty-five obstetrics-gynecology and family medicine physicians completed the survey. Most respondents rated 4 components of 1 model as somewhat realistic or very realistic. The components rated highest were the fetal parts (82% [45 of 55]) and placenta (60% [30 of 50]). This model was rated as more likely to be used in training by 80% (43 of 54) of participants than the 2 other models, as rated by 28% (15 of 54) and 9% (5 of 54) of participants. Conclusions A model made from a plastic bottle containing a stuffed fabric form with detachable parts has tactile similarity to a D&E procedure and should be further developed for testing and training.

Download Full-text