scholarly journals Evaluation of Moral Decision Making Attitudes of Football Infrastructure Athletes Between Ages of 11-18

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3S) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Ramazan Topuz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Normal Distribution ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Moral Decision ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Package Program ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Infrastructure Studies

The aim of this study is to examine and interpret the moral decision-making attitudes of athletes participating in the football branch studies in Konya Province in the 2017-2018 season within the scope of the infrastructure activities of the Atiker Konyaspor Club. The research group consisted of 234 athletes participating in the study voluntarily from the 274 athletes who participated in the infrastructure studies mentioned in 2017-2018 season .In this study which was conducted based on survey model, Moral Decision Making Attitudes Scale was used in the substructure sports developed by Lee et al (2007) and whose Turkish validity and reliability performed by Gürpınar (2014). SPSS 16.0 statistical package program was used to evaluate the data and to find the calculated values. Data were summarized with percentage, mean and standard deviations. The data were tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test if it showed normal distribution and it was determined that the data did not show normal distribution. Since the data is not normal distribution ,The independent group Mann Whitney U test for binary cluster comparisons, Kruskal Wallis-H test for more than two cluster comparisons was used. The Dunnett T3 test was used to determine the source of significant differences from the Kruskal Wallis-H test result.Within the scope of the study,Scale reliability coefficient was calculated as 0.76. The level of significance of the study was taken as 0.05.As a result of the research; As a result of the averages of the Moral Decision Making Attitudes Scale of 234 athletes participating in the mentioned infrastructure activities, While statistically significant differences were determined according to education level, father education level and age variable, No difference was determined according to mother education level variable.

scholarly journals Investigation of variations in terms of decision making and trait anxiety level of football refereesFutbol hakemlerinin karar verme ve sürekli kaygı düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 5681
Author(s):  
İlimdar Yalçın ◽  
Fikret Soyer ◽  
Fikret Ramazanoğlu ◽  
Atakan Aksu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Graduate Education ◽  
Trait Anxiety ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Anxiety Level ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Graduate Degrees ◽  
Package Program ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
One Way Anova

This study has been done in the purpose of investigation the decision making and trait anxiety level of football referees under some variations.Study has been applied to 72 football referees out of 89 (%80.8), regional and national referees, whom work from East and South Easter Anatolian region in 8th and 13th sections.In the study, Mann et al. (1998), “Melbourne Decision Making Scale” adapted by Deniz (2004) and Turkish “Trait Anxiety Inventory” adapted by Türker, Öner and Le Compte (1983) developed by Spielberger and friends. SPSS 22 package program was used to analyze the data obtained in the study and the level of significance was taken as p <0.05. T-test and One-Way Anova were used in the study.As the result of the analysis, in decision making process, the education of self-respect and high attention favors the referees. Those whom has worked more, thus have more experience, tend to have a higher level of decision making. It has been determined that as the age progresses at the level of trait anxiety, there is a regular decrease in trait anxiety level. It has been determined that the level of trait anxiety of the referees who have graduate education level is lower than that of the referees who have undergraduate and graduate degrees. ÖzetBu çalışma, bölgesel ve ulusal futbol hakemlerin karar verme ve sürekli kaygı düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelemesi amacıyla yapılmıştır.Araştırma, Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nde 8. ve 13. Bölge’de bulunan bölgesel ve ulusal futbol hakemi olan toplam 89 hakemden 72 (% 80,8) hakeme uygulanmıştır.Çalışmada, Mann ve Ark. (1998) tarafından geliştirilmiş olup, Deniz (2004) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan ''Melbourne Karar Verme Ölçeği'' ve Spielberger ve arkadaşları (1970) tarafından geliştirilen Öner ve Le Compte (1983) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan ''Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri'' kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen verileri analiz etmek için SPSS 22 paket programı kullanılmış olup anlamlılık düzeyi p<0.05 olarak alınmıştır. Çalışmada t testi ve One -Way Anova kullanılmıştır.Çalışma sonucunda, Karar vermede özsaygı ve dikkatli karar verme düzeylerinde eğitim düzeyi üst seviyede olmasının hakemler lehine önemli bir faktör olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Hakemlik yılı fazla olan futbol hakemlerinin dikkatli karar verme düzeyinin yüksek olduğu gözlenmiştir. Sürekli kaygı düzeyinde yaş ilerledikçe sürekli kaygı düzeyinde de düzenli bir düşüşün olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Eğitimi düzeyi yüksek lisans olan hakemlerin sürekli kaygı düzeyi eğitim durumu ön lisans ve lisans olan hakemlere göre daha düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Leadership, morality and ethics: Developing a practical model for moral decision-making

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred W. Kaszniak ◽  
Cynda H. Rushton ◽  
Joan Halifax
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Applied Ethics ◽  
Moral Decision ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Contemplative Science ◽  
Practical Model

The present paper is the product of collaboration between a neuroscientist, an ethicist, and a contemplative exploring issues around leadership, morality, and ethics. It is an exploration on how people in roles of responsibility can better understand how to engage in discernment processes with more awareness and a deeper sense of responsibility for others and themselves. It draws upon recent research and scholarship in neuroscience, contemplative science, and applied ethics to develop a practical understanding of how moral decision-making works and is essential in this time when there can seem to be an increasing moral vacuum in leadership.

Framing Morality: How Antecedent-Focused Strategies Can Shape Moral Judgments

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kappes ◽  
Jay Joseph Van Bavel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Moral Philosophy ◽  
Moral Dilemmas ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Moral Judgments ◽  
Moral Decision ◽  
Process Dissociation ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
First Response ◽  
High Conflict

From moral philosophy to programming driverless cars, scholars have long been interested in how to shape moral decision-making. We examine how framing can impact moral judgments either by shaping which emotional reactions are evoked in a situation (antecedent-focused) or by changing how people respond to their emotional reactions (response-focused). In three experiments, we manipulated the framing of a moral decision-making task before participants judged a series of moral dilemmas. Participants encouraged to go “with their first” response beforehand favored emotion-driven judgments on high-conflict moral dilemmas. In contrast, participants who were instructed to give a “thoughtful” response beforehand or who did not receive instructions on how to approach the dilemmas favored reason-driven judgments. There was no difference in response-focused control during moral judgements. Process-dissociation confirmed that people instructed to go with their first response had stronger emotion-driven intuitions than other conditions. Our results suggest that task framing can alter moral intuitions.

Impact of a Novel Method of Ethics Education on Nurse Leaders’ Capacity for Moral Decision-Making:

Nurse Leader ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooklyn Aaron ◽  
Avery Glover ◽  
Evelina Sterling ◽  
Stuart Downs ◽  
Jason Lesandrini
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Ethics Education ◽  
Nurse Leaders ◽  
Moral Decision ◽  
Moral Decision Making ◽  
Novel Method
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document