scholarly journals The evaluation of financial analysis in light of the actual requirement on methodology of banking financial performance evaluation

Author(s):  
Vlasta Kašparovská

The content of this article is the evaluation of financial analysis in light of the actual requirement on methodology of banking performance. For the evaluation the criteria reflecting the requirements of those current management and also the requirements of the investors in the financial market was chosen.For the evaluation of financial analysis two models of pyramidal analysis indicators of the bank return on average equity (ROAE) are used. The first is Schierenbeck model and the second is Du Pont pyramidal model modified in accordance with the conditions of the banking company. In the context of legislative changes and market conditions it is not optimal to use financial analysis as the only me­tho­do­lo­gy for evaluation of banking performance. In the future it is necessary to see the point of the financial analysis as a resource for a more sophisticated measure of financial performance.

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Ok-Hee Park ◽  
Kwan-sik Na ◽  
Seok-Kee Lee

Background/Objectives: The purpose of the paper is to examine how family-friendly certificates introduced to pursue the compatibility of work and family life affect the financial performance of small and medium-sized manufacturers, and to provide useful information to companies considering the introduction of this system in the future.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Yuiti Kamiya ◽  
Marcell Mariano Corrêa Maceno ◽  
Mariana Kleina

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Woschnack ◽  
Stefanie Hiss ◽  
Sebastian Nagel ◽  
Bernd Teufel

Abstract This empirical study explores the financialization of social sustainability driven by sustainability accounting and reporting initiatives (SARIs). Since no globally accepted definition of what social sustainability encompasses exists, the paper asks how social sustainability is translated into the financial market language by SARIs as they provide standards for disclosing corporate non-financial performance and promote their concepts of social sustainability. The paper uses a two-step qualitative content analysis. First, it operationalizes social sustainability based on the empirical data of six sustainability rating agencies. Second, this operationalization is compared with the concepts created by three SARIs. The paper shows significant differences between the concepts of the SARIs and the rating agencies. While the rating agencies altogether interpret social sustainability with 83 distinct aspects, the SARIs, although differently created, use significant reduced concepts where 20% of these aspects are absent. The result of this financialization process could be a simplified and financially determined concept of social sustainability within die socially discourse. The research is limited to social sustainability and its financialization by SARIs. Individual indicators and their way or intensity to capture aspects of social sustainability were not part of the research interest. Further research should investigate the economic and the ecological pillars of sustainability as well as the usage of such financialized concepts within the society and especially by corporations. The paper unfolds the arbitrariness of operationalizing a qualitative phenomenon like social sustainability through the financial system. It discloses the need for looking at the mechanisms behind such processes and at the interests of the actors behind the frameworks. The paper reveals the financialization process driven by SARIs and demonstrates its simplifying effects on the concept of social sustainability. Furthermore, the paper shows that SARIs as metrics for non-financial aspects are troubled with a lack of transparency and a lack of convergence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document