Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Study of Human Cortical and Trabecular Bone

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1034-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sauwanan Bumrerraj ◽  
J. Lawrence Katz
2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 1931-1936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Ojanen ◽  
Juha Töyräs ◽  
Satu I. Inkinen ◽  
Markus K. H. Malo ◽  
Hanna Isaksson ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 2439-2442 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.M. Prokhorov ◽  
V.D. Blank ◽  
S.G. Buga ◽  
V.M. Levin

2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 3241-3241
Author(s):  
J. Lawrence Katz ◽  
Paulette Spence ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Anil Misra ◽  
Orestes Marangos ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 999-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne Rupin ◽  
Dorothée Bossis ◽  
Laurence Vico ◽  
Françoise Peyrin ◽  
Kay Raum ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1221-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
K RAUM ◽  
K KEMPF ◽  
H HEIN ◽  
J SCHUBERT ◽  
P MAURER

Author(s):  
Katherine V. Whittington

Abstract The electronics supply chain is being increasingly infiltrated by non-authentic, counterfeit electronic parts, whose use poses a great risk to the integrity and quality of critical hardware. There is a wide range of counterfeit parts such as leads and body molds. The failure analyst has many tools that can be used to investigate counterfeit parts. The key is to follow an investigative path that makes sense for each scenario. External visual inspection is called for whenever the source of supply is questionable. Other methods include use of solvents, 3D measurement, X-ray fluorescence, C-mode scanning acoustic microscopy, thermal cycle testing, burn-in technique, and electrical testing. Awareness, vigilance, and effective investigations are the best defense against the threat of counterfeit parts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document