The Mechanism of Flue Gas Injection for Enhanced Light Oil Recovery

2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. (Raj) Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temperature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near–miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in some of these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116°C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 27.63 MPa to 46.06 MPa. The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.

Author(s):  
O. S. Shokoya ◽  
S. A. Mehta ◽  
R. G. Moore ◽  
B. B. Maini ◽  
M. Pooladi-Darvish ◽  
...  

Flue gas injection into light oil reservoirs could be a cost-effective gas displacement method for enhanced oil recovery, especially in low porosity and low permeability reservoirs. The flue gas could be generated in situ as obtained from the spontaneous ignition of oil when air is injected into a high temp erature reservoir, or injected directly into the reservoir from some surface source. When operating at high pressures commonly found in deep light oil reservoirs, the flue gas may become miscible or near miscible with the reservoir oil, thereby displacing it more efficiently than an immiscible gas flood. Some successful high pressure air injection (HPAI) projects have been reported in low permeability and low porosity light oil reservoirs. Spontaneous oil ignition was reported in these projects, at least from laboratory experiments; however, the mechanism by which the generated flue gas displaces the oil has not been discussed in clear terms in the literature. An experimental investigation was carried out to study the mechanism by which flue gases displace light oil at a reservoir temperature of 116 °C and typical reservoir pressures ranging from 4,028 psi (27.77 MPa) to 6,680 psi (46.06 MPa). The results showed that the flue gases displaced the oil in a forward contacting process resembling a combined vaporizing and condensing multi-contact gas drive mechanism. The flue gases also became near-miscible with the oil at elevated pressures, an indication that high pressure flue gas (or air) injection is a cost-effective process for enhanced recovery of light oils, compared to rich gas or water injection, with the potential of sequestering greenhouse gases.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assef ◽  
Almao

ultra-low permeability; hydraulic fracturing; cyclical gas injection; fracking stages


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (03) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric Clara ◽  
Marc Durandeau ◽  
Gerard Quenault ◽  
Tuyet-Hang Nguyen

Summary Air injection into light-oil reservoirs is now a proven field technique. Because of the unlimited availability and the nil access cost of the injectant, the application potential of this improved recovery process is promising when associated with the lack of available hydrocarbon gas sources for injection. One of the keys of a successful air injection project is the evaluation of the process by carrying out representative laboratory studies. Therefore, an original laboratory strategy was proposed to assess the recovery potential by air injection into light-oil reservoirs, and to help the determination and the quantification of optimal operating conditions. In this paper, the air injection technique applied to light-oil reservoirs is explained. Then, the laboratory strategy proposed for the evaluation of an air injection project is described, and the experimental objectives, devices, and procedures are explained. In order to provide reliable experimental data, high-pressure and high-temperature experiments (up to 40 MPa and 500°C) are performed with consolidated reservoir cores and reservoir oils, at representative conditions of the air injection process in light-oil reservoirs. Finally, a laboratory evaluation regarding a potential application for an air injection pilot in the Handil field (Mahakam delta, Indonesia) is presented and discussed. Introduction Air Injection Process into Light-Oil Reservoirs. When air is injected into a reservoir, the oxygen contained in the air reacts with the hydrocarbons by various oxidation reactions. Heat is evolved from these reactions. High initial reservoir temperatures promote larger heat production. Two study cases must then be differentiated in the light-oil reservoir.When the thermal losses through the rock are limited compared with the heat generated by the reactions, the temperature in the reservoir increases. In this case, complete oxidation reactions providing carbon-oxide gases can be self-ignited in the reservoir. As reported in recent studies, 1 the oxygen is then consumed in a confined zone called an oxidation (or combustion)front. The size of this zone depends on the air injection rate, the characteristics of the oil, and the formation. In light-oil reservoirs, typical oxidation front temperatures of 200 to 400°C (about 400 to 800°F) can be reached. The produced combustion gases consist of CO 2 and CO with CO/CO2˜0.15, depending on the temperatures reached and the oil characteristics.When the thermal losses through the rock are high, or when the heat release is not high enough to increase the temperature significantly (in the case of high-water saturations or low-oil saturations), the oxidation reactions occur at a temperature close to the initial reservoir temperature. In this case, oxidation reactions can be partial with a lower carbon-oxide generation than in the previous case. The oxygen consumption occurs then through a larger reservoir zone, the size of which depends upon the oil reactivity.2 Several field experiences**3,4 have shown that high levels of CO2 may be produced. This would suggest that spontaneous ignition, with generation of a high-temperature front and the production of associated carbon-oxide gases, is most likely occurring in light-oil reservoirs. The generation of a high-temperature oxidation zone (200 to 400°C) is preferable because of a higher oxygen uptake potential, a more efficient carbon-oxide generation, and the creation of an oil bank downstream of the thermal front. Both of the latter factors contribute to the improvement of the recovery. In both cases, the important point to assess is oxygen consumption to prevent oxygen arrival at the producers. This is one of the main objectives of air injection experiments. Reservoir Zones to be Distinguished. When a high-temperature thermal front is ignited, four main zones can be distinguished in the reservoir (Fig. 1):The zone swept by the combustion front, where the residual oil saturation is low and the temperature higher than the initial reservoir temperature.The oxidation front where oxygen is consumed. The temperature can reach400°C Part of the original oil is burnt (about 5 to 10% OOIP) and CO2 and CO are produced. The gas formed by the remaining nitrogen from the air and the combustion gases is called "flue gas" (typically, 85% of N2 13% of CO2 and 2%of CO) and sweeps the reservoir downstream.A short zone downstream of the combustion front where thermal effects participate in the formation of an oil bank. This oil bank is partially displaced by the flue gas and by hot water or a steam front according to the reservoir conditions.A wide zone downstream of the combustion front where no thermal effects occur. This zone, which contains original oil, is not affected by the thermal effects and is swept by the flue gas. When the oxidation reactions occur at low temperature (close to the reservoir temperature), three main zones can be distinguished:A zone around the injector which is swept by the injected air. In this area, residual oil saturation is low. The oil is partially oxidized but can no longer consume oxygen.A large oxidation zone where oxygen is consumed by the residual oil left after flue gas sweeping. The oxygen concentration in the gas phase progressively decreases from 21 to 0%.A wide zone downstream of the oxidation zone, swept by the flue gas at reservoir temperature, as in the previous case (high-temperature front).However, in this case, less carbon oxides have been generated by oxidation reactions and the flue gas is mainly composed of nitrogen. In practice, both cases can co-exist in a given reservoir, according to the local reservoir properties.


Author(s):  
Junyu Deng ◽  
Guibin Wang ◽  
Yanmin Liu ◽  
Yuting Wang ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Ezekiel ◽  
Shaoran Ren ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Yuting Wang ◽  
Yanmin Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Huang ◽  
Zongfa Li ◽  
Shaoran Ren ◽  
Yanming Liu

Abstract The technology of air injection has been widely used in the second and tertiary recovery in oilfields. However, due to the injected air and natural gas will explode, the safety of the gas injection technology has attracted much attention. Gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is a new method that eliminates explosion risks and improves oil recovery in large-dip oil reservoirs or thick oil layers. The explosion limit data of different components of natural gas under high pressure were obtained through explosion experiments, which verified the suppression effect of oxygen-reduced air on explosions. The influence of natural gas composition and concentration on explosion limits was also investigated. In addition, a rotatable displacement device was used to study the feasibility of gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air injection for improving the heavy oil reservoirs recovery. Under pressure and temperature conditions of 20MPa and 371K, the sand-filled gravity flooding experiments with different dip angles were carried out using oxygen-reduced air with an oxygen content of 8%. The results show that with the increase of the reservoir dip, the pore volume of the injected fluid at the gas channeling point, the efficient development time of gas injection, and the final displacement efficiency of gas injection development all increase through gravity stabilization caused by gravity differentiation. In the presence of a dip angle, the cumulative oil production before the gas breakthrough point exceeded 80% of the oil production during the entire production process, indicating that gravity assisted oxygen-reduced air flooding is an effective and safe improving oil recovery method. Finally, the explosion risk of each link of the air injection process is analyzed, and the high-risk area and the low-risk area are determined.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Greaves ◽  
R.R. Rathbone ◽  
O. ElAyadi ◽  
M. ElAbidi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document