Closure to “Discussion of ‘Identification of Machining System Dynamics by Equation Error Minimization’” (1978, ASME J. Eng. Ind., 100, p. 339)

1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-339
Author(s):  
K. Srinivasan ◽  
C. L. Nachtigal
1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Srinivasan ◽  
C. L. Nachtigal

The application of a sequential equation error minimization method to the identification of the dynamics of machining systems is described here. The development of the identification method was motivated by the need for models of machining system dynamics for the design of active chatter controllers. The dynamic cutting force parameters as well as the machine structure transfer function parameters are required for this task. This identification method is novel in the machine tool area in that it identifies both cutting force parameters and structure parameters with the same experimental data. A convenient excitation of the system dynamics is chosen. The system response is prefiltered before being processed and the equation error minimization scheme is refined to insure the validity of the results obtained. The correctness of the identification scheme is verified by using it to identify parameters in analog computer simulations of practical maching systems. The results of structural identification for experimental plunge cutting operations are also presented here.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
Gabriel Frumuşanu ◽  
◽  
Alexandru Epureanu ◽  

Nowadays, the part program describes only the process itself and not the obtained performance. The operator monitors just some of the variables describing the actually obtained product and appropriately adjusts the values of the programmed variables. This adjustment is realised with a considerable delay and without an adequate fundament (many times even intuitively). Moreover, process monitoring currently follows only to notice the occurrence of perturbations and, hence, of deviations from process plan. As consequence, the performance in accomplishing the manufacturing task might be diminished due to an insufficient knowledge about both the system dynamics and the conditions in which the process is performed. Starting from these premises, the challenge addressed here is to rebuild at conceptual level the monitoring system such us the monitoring becomes holistic, this meaning evaluation & reveal of machining system current state & dynamics. In other words, the holistic monitoring concerns both the values of the variables describing the system state and the relations of causality between them. In this paper, the holistic monitoring is introduced through an illustrative sample. The monitoring variables and functions are defined and sampled.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document