Contact Kinematics between Three-Dimensional Rigid Bodies with General Surface Parameterization

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Mubang Xiao ◽  
Ye Ding
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Relative Motion ◽  
Screw Theory ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Contact Point ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Frame Field ◽  
Contact Kinematics ◽  
Acceleration Analysis

Abstract This paper provides an improvement of the classic Montana's contact kinematics equations considering non-orthogonal object parameterizations. In Montana's model, the reference frame used to define the relative motion between two rigid bodies in three-dimensional space is chosen as the Gauss frame, assuming there is an orthogonal coordinate system on the object surface. To achieve global orthogonal parameterizations on arbitrarily shaped object surfaces, we define the relative motion based on the reference frame field, which is the orthogonalization of the surface natural basis at every contact point. The first- and second-order contact kinematics, including the velocity and acceleration analysis of the relative rolling, sliding, and spinning motion, are reformulated based on the reference frame field and the screw theory. We use two simulation examples to illustrate the proposed method. The examples are based on simple non-orthogonal surface parameterizations, instead of seeking for global orthogonal parameterizations on the surfaces.

Second-Order Contact Kinematics Between Three-Dimensional Rigid Bodies

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zachary Woodruff ◽  
Kevin M. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Contact Kinematics ◽  
Acceleration Analysis ◽  
Order Contact

In this discussion, we provide corrections to the second-order kinematic equations describing contact between three-dimensional rigid bodies, originally published in Sarkar et al. (1996) [“Velocity and Acceleration Analysis of Contact Between Three-Dimensional Rigid Bodies,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 63(4), pp. 974–984].

Velocity and Acceleration Analysis of Contact Between Three-Dimensional Rigid Bodies

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 974-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sankar ◽  
V. Kumar ◽  
Xiaoping Yun
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Relative Motion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Local Surface ◽  
Contact Points ◽  
Pure Rolling ◽  
Acceleration Analysis ◽  
Rigid Body Motions ◽  
Two Bodies

During manipulation and locomotion tasks encountered in robotics, it is often necessary to control the relative motion between two contacting rigid bodies. In this paper we obtain the equations relating the motion of the contact points on the pair of contacting bodies to the rigid-body motions of the two bodies. The equations are developed up to the second order. The velocity and acceleration constraints for contact, for rolling, and for pure rolling are derived. These equations depend on the local surface properties of each contacting body. Several examples are presented to illustrate the nature of the equations.

Velocity and Acceleration Analysis of Contact Between Three-Dimensional Rigid Bodies

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilanjan Sarkar ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Xiaoping Yun
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Relative Motion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Local Surface ◽  
Contact Points ◽  
Pure Rolling ◽  
Acceleration Analysis ◽  
Rigid Body Motions ◽  
Two Bodies

Abstract During manipulation and locomotion tasks encountered in robotics, it is often necessary to control the relative motion between two contacting rigid bodies. In this paper we obtain the equations relating the motion of the contact points on the pair of contacting bodies to the rigid body motions of the two bodies. The equations are developed up to the second order. The velocity and acceleration constraints for contact, for rolling, and for pure rolling are derived. These equations depend on the local surface properties of each contacting body. Several examples are presented to illustrate the nature of the equations.

Geometrical Properties of Modelled Robot Elasticity: Part II — Center of Elasticity

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Lipkin ◽  
Timothy Patterson
Keyword(s):  
Screw Theory ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Compliance Matrix ◽  
Geometrical Properties ◽  
Robot Systems ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Generalized Center ◽  
Three Dimensional Space ◽  
Elastic Characteristics

Abstract The elastic characteristics of many robot systems can be modeled by a 6 × 6 stiffness or compliance matrix. Several new and important results are presented via screw theory: i) A generalized center-of-elasticity is proposed based on Ball’s (1900) principal screws and its properties are investigated, ii) If a compliant axis exists, it is shown to pass through the center. iii) The perpendicular vectors from the center to the wrench-compliant axes are coplanar and sum to zero. A similar result holds for the twist-compliant axes, iv) Linear and rotational properties are characterized by dual ellipsoids in three-dimensional space. These elements simplify the understanding of complex elastic properties.

Optimal Contact Force Distribution for Multi-Limbed Robots

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis W. Hong ◽  
Raymond J. Cipra
Keyword(s):  
Contact Force ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Contact Point ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Force Distribution ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
Contact Force Distribution

One of the inherent problems of multi-limbed mobile robotic systems is the problem of multi-contact force distribution; the contact forces and moments at the feet required to support it and those required by its tasks are indeterminate. A new strategy for choosing an optimal solution for the contact force distribution of multi-limbed robots with three feet in contact with the environment in three-dimensional space is presented. The incremental strategy of opening up the friction cones is aided by using the “force space graph” which indicates where the solution is positioned in the solution space to give insight into the quality of the chosen solution and to provide robustness against disturbances. The “margin against slip with contact point priority” approach is also presented which finds an optimal solution with different priorities given to each foot contact point. Examples are presented to illustrate certain aspects of the method and ideas for other optimization criteria are discussed.

Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly ( Musca domestica L.) I. Organization of the flight motor

1986 ◽  
Vol 312 (1158) ◽  
pp. 527-551 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
The Body ◽  
Midsagittal Plane ◽  
Torque Vector ◽  
Translation Velocity ◽  
Flight Motor

Free-flying houseflies have been filmed simultaneously from two sides. The orientation of the flies’ body axes in three-dimensional space can be seen on the films. A method is presented for the reconstruction of the flies’ movements in a fly-centred coordinate system, relative to an external coordinate system and relative to the airstream. The flies are regarded as three-dimensionally rigid bodies. They move with respect to the six degrees of freedom they thus possess. The analysis of the organization of the flight motor from the kinematic data leads to the following conclusions: the sideways movements can, at least qualitatively, be explained by taking into account the sideways forces resulting from rolling the body about the long axis and the influence of inertia. Thus, the force vector generated by the flight motor is most probably located in the fly’s midsagittal plane. The direction of this vector can be varied by the fly in a restricted range only. In contrast, the direction of the torque vector can be freely adjusted by the fly. No coupling between the motor force and the torques is indicated. Changes of flight direction may be explained by changes in the orientation of the body axes: straight flight at an angle of sideslip differing from zero is due to rolling. Sideways motion during the banked turns as well as the decrease of translation velocity observed in curves are a consequence of the inertial forces and rolling. The results are discussed with reference to studies about the aerodynamic performance of insects and the constraints for aerial pursuit.

scholarly journals Cases of Integrability Which Correspond to the Motion of a Pendulum in the Three-dimensional Space

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 73-84
Author(s):  
Maxim V. Shamolin
Keyword(s):  
Rigid Body ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Characteristic Point ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
The Body ◽  
Spatial Motion ◽  
Free Rigid Body

We systematize some results on the study of the equations of spatial motion of dynamically symmetric fixed rigid bodies–pendulums located in a nonconservative force fields. The form of these equations is taken from the dynamics of real fixed rigid bodies placed in a homogeneous flow of a medium. In parallel, we study the problem of a spatial motion of a free rigid body also located in a similar force fields. Herewith, this free rigid body is influenced by a nonconservative tracing force; under action of this force, either the magnitude of the velocity of some characteristic point of the body remains constant, which means that the system possesses a nonintegrable servo constraint, or the center of mass of the body moves rectilinearly and uniformly; this means that there exists a nonconservative couple of forces in the system

scholarly journals On a method of nonlinear optimization for the comparison of spatial structure of molecules

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Natalia Chernikova ◽  
Eugeniy Laneev
Keyword(s):  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Structural Formula ◽  
Rigid Bodies ◽  
Mutual Orientation ◽  
Comparison Function ◽  
Euler Angles ◽  
Geometric Structures ◽  
Rosenbrock Method ◽  
Centers Of Mass

To compare the geometry of two or more geometric structures consisting of N ordered points, and which can be considered as solids in three-dimensional space, we developed a method based on the minimization of a certain comparison function. This function is the sum of squared distances between pairs of elements of the two structures under comparison with the same indices. Distances change when changing the mutual orientation of the structures with all possible shifts and rotations of the structures as rigid bodies. The comparison function is minimized with respect to Euler angles, provided that centers of mass of two compared structures are superposed. The minimization of the comparison function with respect to Euler angles is carried out numerically by the Rosenbrock method. The developed method for comparison of geometric structures is used to solve problems in structural chemistry, that is to compare molecules with the same structural formula in one crystal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document