CFD Prediction for Multi-Jet Impingement Heat Transfer

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Q. Zu ◽  
Y. Y. Yan ◽  
J. D. Maltson
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation Model ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Shear Stress Transport ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer

In this paper, the flow and heat transfer characteristics of two lines of staggered or inline round jets impinging on a flat plate are numerically analyzed using the CFD commercial code FLUENT. Firstly, the relative performance of seven versions of turbulence models, including the standard k-ε model, the renormalization group k-ε model, the realizable k-ε model, the standard k-ω model, the Shear-Stress Transport k-ω model, the Reynolds stress model and the Large Eddy Simulation model, for numerically predicting single jet impingement heat transfer is investigated by comparing the numerical results with available benchmark experimental data. As a result, the Shear-Stress Transport k-ω model is recommended as the best compromise between the computational cost and accuracy. Using the Shear-Stress Transport k-ω model, the impingement flow and heat transfer under multi-jets with different jet distributions and attack angles are simulated and studied. The effect of hole distribution and angle of attack, etc. on the heat transfer coefficient of the target plate are examined.

scholarly journals Impingement Heat Transfer: Correlations and Numerical Modeling

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 544-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Zuckerman ◽  
Noam Lior
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Impinging Jet ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Model Errors ◽  
Simulation Techniques ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Model Equations ◽  
Stress Models

Uses of impinging jet devices for heat transfer are described, with a focus on cooling applications within turbine systems. Numerical simulation techniques and results are described, and the relative strengths and drawbacks of the k-ε,k-ω, Reynolds stress model, algebraic stress models, shear stress transport, and v2f turbulence models for impinging jet flow and heat transfer are compared. Select model equations are provided as well as quantitative assessments of model errors and judgments of model suitability.

Steady RANS of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Smooth and Pin-Finned U-Duct With a Trapezoidal Cross Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenny S.-Y. Hu ◽  
Xingkai Chi ◽  
Tom I.-P. Shih ◽  
Minking Chyu ◽  
Michael Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Relative Error ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Separated Flow ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Maximum Relative Error ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Pin Fins ◽  
Turn Region

Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed to examine the ability of four turbulence models—realizable k–ε (k–ε), shear-stress transport (SST), Reynolds stress model with linear pressure strain (RSM-LPS), and stress-omega RSM (RSM-τω)—to predict the turbulent flow and heat transfer in a trapezoidal U-duct with and without a staggered array of pin fins. Results generated for the heat-transfer coefficient (HTC) were compared with experimental measurements. For the smooth U-duct, the maximum relative error in the averaged HTC in the up-leg is 2.5% for k–ε, SST, and RSM-τω and 9% for RSM-LPS. In the turn region, the maximum is 50% for k–ε and RSM-LPS, 14.5% for RSM-τω, and 29% for SST. In the down-leg, SST gave the best predictions and RSM-τω being a close second with maximum relative error less than 10%. The ability to predict the separated flow downstream of the turn dominated the performance of the models. For the U-duct with pin fins, SST and RSM-τω predicted the best, and k–ε predicted the least accurate HTCs. For k–ε, the maximum relative error is about 25%, whereas it is 15% for the SST and RSM-τω, and they occur in the turn. In the turn region, the staggered array of pin fins was found to behave like guide vanes in turning the flow. The pin fins also reduced the size of the separated region just after the turn.

Multi-Jet Impingement Heat Transfer With a Dimple-Pimple Patterned Jet Plate

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Husam Zawati ◽  
Gaurav Gupta ◽  
Yakym Khlyapov ◽  
Erik Fernandez ◽  
Jayanta Kapat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Air Jets ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract The objective of the present study is the evaluation of the heat transfer difference between a novel jet plate configuration and a conventional flat jet orifice plate. Physical mechanisms that lead to a change in Nusselt number when comparing both configurations are discussed in two regions: impingement and crossflow. In the presented work, both plates with identical inline arrays of (20 × 26) circular air jets impinging orthogonally on a flat target comprised of 20 segments parallel to the jet orifice plates, are studied. The first is a staggered configuration of a pimple-dimple (convex-concave) plate. This plate features two jet diameters: (a) 4.63 mm emanating from negative sphere of 14.63 mm in radius inward imprint; (b) 2.19 mm emanating from a positive sphere of 17.07 mm in radius, protruding from the base of the plate. The second jet plate is flat, which serves as a baseline for the heat transfer study. This plate has a constant jet orifice diameters of 3.49 mm, found based on the definition of total average open area of the first plate (NPR configuration). Heat transfer characteristics and turbulent flow structures are investigated over jet-averaged Reynolds numbers (Reav,j) of 5,000, 7,000, and 9,000. Jet-to-plate distance (Z/Dj) is varied between (2.4 – 6.0) jet diameters. A numerical study is carried out to compare various turbulence models (κε-EB, κε-Lag EB, κε-v2f, κω-SST, RST). Numerical simulations are analyzed in detail to explain the underlying mechanism of heat transfer enhancement, related to such geometries. The convex-concaved plate yields lower globally-averaged heat transfer coefficients when compared to a flat jet plate in the impingement region. However, enhancement up to 23% is seen in the crossflow region, where the crossflow effects are dominant in a maximum-crossflow configuration.

Numerical Study on Stagnation Point Heat Transfer by Jet Impingement in a Confined Narrow Gap

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Q. Zu ◽  
Y. Y. Yan ◽  
J. Maltson
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Plate Length ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Air Jet ◽  
Target Spacing

In this paper, the heat transfer characteristics of a circular air jet vertically impinging on a flat plate near to the nozzle (H/d=1–6, where H is the nozzle-to-target spacing and d is the diameter of the jet) are numerically analyzed. The relative performance of seven turbulent models for predicting this type of flow and heat transfer is investigated by comparing the numerical results with available benchmark experimental data. It is found that the shear-stress transport (SST) k−ω model and the large Eddy simulation (LES) time-variant model can give better predictions for the performance of fluid flow and heat transfer; especially, the SST k−ω model should be the best compromise between computational cost and accuracy. In addition, using the SST k−ω model, the effects of jet Reynolds number (Re), jet plate length-to-jet diameter ratio (L/d), target spacing-to-jet diameter ratio (H/d), and jet plate width-to-jet diameter ratio (W/d) on the local Nusselt number (Nu) of the target plate are examined; a correlation for the stagnation Nu is presented.

Flow and Heat Transfer Predictions for a Flat-Tip Turbine Blade

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huitao Yang ◽  
Sumanta Acharya ◽  
Srinath V. Ekkad ◽  
Chander Prakash ◽  
Ron Bunker
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Tip Leakage Flow ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Pitch Direction ◽  
Blade Tip

Numerical calculations are performed to simulate the tip leakage flow and heat transfer on the GE-E3 High-Pressure-Turbine (HPT) rotor blade. The calculations are performed for a single blade with periodic conditions imposed along the two boundaries in the circumferential-pitch direction. Cases considered are a flat blade tip at three different tip gap clearances of 1%, 1.5% and 2.5% of the blade span. The numerical results are obtained for two different pressure ratios (ratio of inlet total pressure to exit static pressure) of 1.2 and 1.32 and an inlet turbulence level of 6.1%. To explore the effect of turbulence models on the heat transfer results, three different models of increasing complexity and computational effort (standard high Re k-ε model, RNG k-ε and Reynolds Stress Model) are investigated. The predicted tip heat transfer results are compared with the experimental data of Azad [1], and show satisfactory agreement with the data. Hear transfer predictions for all three turbulence models are comparable, and no significant improvements are obtained with the Reynolds-stress model.

Modelling of Impinging Flow and Heat Transfer in a Confined Narrow Gap

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Q. Zu ◽  
Y. Y. Yan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Diameter Ratio ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Air Jet ◽  
Shear Stress Transport ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Target Spacing

In this paper, the flow and heat transfer characteristics of a circular air jet vertically impinging on a flat plate near to the nozzle (H/d = 1∼6, where H is the nozzle-to-target spacing, d the diameter of the jet) are numerical analyzed using the CFD code FLUENT 6.1.18. The relative performance of seven versions of turbulent models, including the standard k–ε model, the renormalization group k–ε model, the realizable k-ε model, the standard k–ω model, the Shear-Stress Transport (SST) k–ω model, the Reynolds Stress (RS) model and the Large Eddy Simulation (LES), for the prediction of this type of flow and heat transfer is investigated by comparing the numerical results with available benchmark experimental data. It is found that Shear-Stress Transport k–ω model and Large Eddy Simulation time-variant model can give better predictions of fluid flow and heat transfer properties; especially, the SST k–ω model is recommended as the best compromise between the computational cost and accuracy. Using SST k-ω model, the effects of jet Reynolds number (Re), jet plate length-to-jet diameter ratio (L/d), target spacing-to-jet diameter ratio (H/d) and jet plate width-to-jet diameter ratio (W/d) on local Nusselt number (Nu) of the target plate are examined. A correlation for the stagnation Nu is presented.

Reynolds Averaged and Large Eddy Computations of Flow and Heat Transfer Under Round Jet Impingement

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thangam Natarajan ◽  
James Jewkes ◽  
Ramesh Narayanaswamy ◽  
Yongmann M. Chung ◽  
Anthony D. Lucey
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Round Jet ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Large Eddy

The fluid dynamics and heat transfer characteristics of a turbulent round jet are modelled numerically using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES). Meshes with varying degrees of coarseness, with both radial and axial refinements are investigated. Discretization is carried out using the finite volume method. The jet configurations are chosen to enable validation against well-established experimental jet-impingement heat-transfer studies, particularly that of Cooper et al. [1]. The Reynolds number studied is 23000. The height of discharge from the impingement wall is fixed at twice the jet diameter. The work critically examines the effect of Reynolds number, standoff distance and helps to ascertain the relative merits of various turbulence models, by comparing turbulent statistics and the Nusselt number distributions. The present work is carried out as a preliminary validation, in a wider study intended to determine the thermofluidic behaviour of jets impinging upon an oscillating surface.

Two-Equation Versus Reynolds-Stress Modeling in Predicting Flow and Heat Transfer in a Smooth U-Duct With and Without Rotation

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Gu ◽  
H.-W. Wu ◽  
H. J. Schock ◽  
T. I.-P. Shih
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Small Radius ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Surface Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Significant Difference

Computations were performed by using Version 5.5 of the Fluent-UNS code to compare two turbulence models in predicting the three-dimensional flow and heat transfer in a smooth duct of square cross section with a small radius of curvature 180-degree bend under rotating and non-rotating conditions (Re = 25,000; Ro = 0.0 and 0.24). The two turbulence models investigated are the standard k-ε model and a Reynolds stress model. For both models, the two-layer low-Reynolds model of Chen and Patel was used in the near-wall region. Results obtained show that though the k-ε model predicts turbulence quantities incorrectly, the predicted velocity and temperature fields and the surface heat transfer are similar to those from the Reynolds stress model when there is no rotation. When there is rotation, there is significant difference in the predicted surface heat transfer on the leading surface. But, the predicted flow field is still qualitatively similar.

Comparison Between EVM and RSM Turbulence Models in Predicting Flow and Heat Transfer in Rib-Roughened Channels

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Sleiti ◽  
J. S. Kapat
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Internal Cooling ◽  
Wall Functions ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Near Wall ◽  
Rib Roughened

A 3-D analysis of two-equation eddy-viscosity (EVMs) and Reynolds stress (RSM) turbulence models and their application to solving flow and heat transfer in rotating rib-roughened internal cooling channels is the main focus of this study. The flow in theses channels is affected by ribs, rotation, buoyancy, bends and boundary conditions. The EVMs considered are: The standard k–ε Model: of Launder and Spalding Launder and Spalding [1], the Renormalization Group k-ε model: Yakhot and Orszag [2], the Realizable k-ε model Shur et al. [3], the standard k-ω Model, Wilcox Wilcox [4], and the Shear-Stress Transport (SST) k-ω Model, Menter [5]. The viscosity affected near wall region is resolved by enhanced near wall treatment using combined two-layer model with enhanced wall functions. The results for both stationary and rotating channels showed the advantages of Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), Gibson and Launder [6], Launder [7], Launder [8] in predicting the flow field and heat transfer compared to the isotropic EVMs that need corrections to account for streamline curvature, buoyancy and rotation.

Measurement and Modeling of Confined Jet Discharged Tangentially on a Concave Semicylindrical Hot Surface

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad O. Hamdan ◽  
Emad Elnajjar ◽  
Yousef Haik
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Heated Surface ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Infrared Camera ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Outlet Flow

The paper investigates experimentally and numerically the heat transfer augmentation from a semicircular heated surface due to confined slot-jet impingement. For different Reynolds numbers, the average and local Nusselt numbers are calculated by reporting the heater thermal image obtained by an infrared camera, the inlet and outlet flow temperature via thermocouples, the flow rate via rotameter, and the pressure drop across the inlet and outlet flow via pressure transducers. The single enclosed jet flow is used to create a single cyclone inside the internal semicircular channel to promote the heat transfer at different jet Reynolds numbers (Rejet = 1000–5000). Three turbulence models, namely, the standard k – ɛ, k – ω and the Reynolds stress model (RSM) have been investigated in the present paper by comparing Nusselt number and normalized pressure drop distribution against the experimental data, helping ascertain on the relative merits of the adopted models. The computational fluid dynamics results show that the RSM turbulent model reasonably forecast the experimental data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document