Influence of Weld Residual Stresses on Ductile Crack Behavior in AISI Type 316LN Stainless Steel Weld Joint

Author(s):  
Sai Deepak Namburu ◽  
Lakshmana Rao Chebolu ◽  
A. Krishnan Subramanian ◽  
Raghu Prakash ◽  
Sasikala Gomathy

Welding residual stress is one of the main concerns in the process of fabrication and operation because of failures in welded steel joints due to its potential effect on structural integrity. This work focuses on the effect of welding residual stress on the ductile crack growth behavior in AISI 316LN welded CT specimens. Two-dimensional plane strain model has been used to simulate the CT specimen. X-ray diffraction technique is used to obtain residual stress value at the SS 316LN weld joint. The GTN model has been employed to estimate the ductile crack growth behavior in the CT-specimen. Results show that residual stresses influence the ductile crack growth behavior. The effect of residual stress has also been investigated for cases with different initial void volume fraction, crack lengths.

Author(s):  
X. B. Ren ◽  
Z. L. Zhang ◽  
B. Nyhus

In this paper, a numerical study was performed to assess the effect of residual stresses on ductile crack growth resistance of a typical pipeline steel. A modified boundary layer model was employed for the analysis under plane strain, Mode I loading condition. The residual stress fields were introduced into the finite element model by the eigenstrain method. The complete Gurson model has been applied to simulate the ductile fracture, which is characterized by microvoid nucleation, growth and coalescence. Results show that tensile residual stresses can significantly reduce the crack growth resistance when the crack growth is small compared with the length scale of the tensile residual stress field. With the crack growth, the effect of residual stresses on the crack growth resistance tends to diminish. It has also been found that the effect of residual stresses on crack growth resistance depends on the initial void volume fraction f0 and hardening exponent n.


Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo

Abstract Fitness for service rules and a calculation method for ductile crack growth under large scale plastic cyclic loading have not been established even for Mode I. In a paper presented at the PVP2018 conference the authors presented methods to establish how to determine the parameters of the combined hardening plasticity rule and applied it to simulate the ductile crack growth behavior of 1TCT specimens of the different load levels. Also, ΔJ calculations using the reference stress method, and a ΔJ-basis fatigue crack growth rate derived from that on ΔK-basis according to JSME rules for FFS were applied to estimate the crack growth under cyclic loading in excess of yield. Since in the 2018 paper identified some gaps were found between experiments and the predicted crack growth behavior, several equations of the reference stress method are evaluated in the present paper. Additionally, the prediction procedure using the ΔJ calculation by the reference stress method and the da/dN−ΔJ curve based on the JSME rules for FFS are applied to pipe fracture tests under cyclic loading. Their applicability is discussed for the case of an example piping system.


Author(s):  
P. Dong ◽  
G. Rawls

Detailed residual stress analysis was performed for a multi-pass butt weld, representing the middle butt-girth weld of a storage tank. The analysis procedures addressed welding parameters, joint detail, weld pass deposition sequence, and temperature-dependent properties. The predicted residual stresses were then considered in stress intensity factor calculations using a three-dimensional finite element alternating model (FEAM) for investigating crack growth behavior for both small elliptical surface and through-wall cracks. Two crack orientations were considered: one is parallel to the vessel girth weld and the other is perpendicular to the girth weld. Since the longitudinal (parallel to weld) and transverse (perpendicular to weld) residual stresses exhibit drastically different distributions, a different crack growth behavior is predicted. For a small surface crack parallel to the weld, the crack tends to grow more quickly at the surface along the weld rather than into the thickness. The self-equilibrating nature of the transverse residual stress distribution suggests that a through-wall crack parallel to crack cannot be fully developed solely due to residual stress actions. For a crack that is perpendicular to the weld, a small surface crack exhibit a rapid increase in K at the deepest position, suggesting that a small surface crack has the propensity to become a through-wall crack. Once the through crack is fully developed, a significant re-distribution in longitudinal residual stress can be seen. As a result, in the absence of external loads there exists a limiting crack length beyond which further crack growth is deemed unlikely.


2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 (0) ◽  
pp. 433-434
Author(s):  
Masakazu YOSHINO ◽  
Yoshio URABE ◽  
Koji KOYAMA ◽  
Yasuhide ASADA

Author(s):  
Do-Jun Shim ◽  
Mohammed Uddin ◽  
Frederick Brust ◽  
Gery Wilkowski

Cohesive zone modeling has been shown to be a convenient and effective method to simulate and analyze the ductile crack growth behavior in fracture specimens and structures. However, the cohesive zone modeling has not been applied to simulate the ductile crack growth behavior of a circumferential through-wall cracked pipe. In this paper, cohesive zone modeling has been applied to simulate the ductile crack growth of a past through-wall-cracked pipe test that was conducted during Degraded Piping Program. The ABAQUS code was used for the three-dimensional finite element analysis. The bending moment at crack initiation, maximum bending moment, crack extension, and J-integral values were calculated from the finite element analysis. These results were compared with the experimental results. In addition, results obtained from an existing J-estimation scheme (LBB.ENG2) were provided for comparison. All results showed reasonable agreement. The results of the present study demonstrate that the cohesive zone modeling can be applied to simulate the ductile crack growth behavior of a through-wall cracked pipe.


Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Shinichi Kawabata ◽  
Naoki Ogawa

The ductile crack growth calculation method under excessive cyclic loading has not been established in the rules for fitness for service, even for Mode I. On the paper for the PVP2017 conference, the authors simulated ductile crack growth behavior of CT specimens under cyclic loading within a committee of the Japan Welding Society, and showed that the Chaboche model and bilinear kinetic hardening rules underestimated the load in compression. The discrepancy between the prediction results and the experimental results were also shown to become larger with increasing load cycle number. In this paper, the authors tried to establish how to determine the parameters of the combined hardening rule and then applied it to simulate the ductile crack growth behavior of the 1TCT specimens for loading levels different from that of last year. Also, the simplified ΔJ calculation, for example the reference stress method, and the crack growth rate from the JSME rules for FFS were applied to estimate the ductile crack growth. Based on this approach, the crack growth analysis method was investigated in order to incorporate into the JSME rules for large cyclic loading.


Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Shinichi Kawabata

Ductile crack growth calculation method under excessive cyclic loading in a fitness for service rule has not been established even in Mode I. The authors simulated ductile crack growth behavior of CT specimens under cyclic loading executed in a committee of the Japan Welding Society. Sensitivity of the used stress-strain curves by monotonic or cyclic loading and the effect of the hardening rule were investigated. For evaluation of the crack growth rate under excessive cyclic loading, the parameter ΔJ was applied and compared with the rate of the JSME rules for FFS.


2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 (188) ◽  
pp. 679-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Ohata ◽  
Fumiyoshi Minami ◽  
Syusuke Fujita ◽  
Masaaki Hashimoto ◽  
Masao Toyoda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document