Circumventing Newton: A study in scientific creativity

1978 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Gingerich
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Creativity

Student self-realization in sphere of scientific creativity

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
Elizaveta Evgen’evna Vasil’eva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Creativity

THEORY OF LAW AND PHILOSOPHY OF LAW AS THEORETICAL DISCOURSES: SPECIFICS AND RELATIONSHIP

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Вадим Леонидович Афанасьевский
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Theory ◽  
Theoretical Concept ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
The West ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Relationship

В статье анализируется проблема взаимоотношений философии права и научной теории права. Рассматриваемая проблема стала особенно актуальной в российском образовательном пространстве в связи с введением после длительного перерыва в государственный образовательный стандарт магистратуры по юриспруденции учебной дисциплины «Философия права». Автор статьи в качестве базисного принимает тезис, согласно которому философия права, являясь сферой философской мысли, и теория права как область научного социогуманитарного знания представляют собой разные типы теоретического дискурса. Исходя из этого, в статье выстраивается теоретическая концепция, согласно которой задачей философии права как философского типа мышления является конструирование или экспликация онтологических, эпистемологических, аксиологических, феноменологических оснований для формирования и функционирования научных теоретико-правовых и историко-правовых построений. Для реализации поставленной в статье задачи подробно рассматриваются ключевые характеристики как теории философского типа, так и идеалов, норм и характеристик научного знания. Выявленное различие экстраполируется на взаимоотношение теории права как продукта научного творчества и философии права как конструкции, задающей базовые мировоззренческие смыслы. В качестве примера выработанных философией права и государства оснований научных теорий прогресса, государства, морали и права, автор приводит взгляды мыслителей западноевропейской философской классики: Т. Гоббса, Ж.-Ж. Руссо, И. Канта, Г.В.Ф. Гегеля. Именно их философские концепции предопределили образы теоретико- и историко-правовых учений XVIII, XIX, XX и даже начала XXI в. Таким образом, отношение философии права и теории права выстраивается по «вертикали»: от онтологического основания к возведению теоретико-правовых и историко-правовых научных построений. The article analyzes the problem of the relationship between the philosophy of law and the scientific theory of law. The problem under consideration has become especially urgent in the Russian educational space in connection with the introduction of the Philosophy of Law discipline master's degree in law after a long break. The author of the article takes as the basis the thesis that the philosophy of law, being the sphere of philosophical thought, and the theory of law as a field of scientific socio-humanitarian knowledge are different types of theoretical discourse. Based on this, the article builds a theoretical concept according to which the task of the philosophy of law as a philosophical type of thinking is the construction or explication of ontological, epistemological, axiological, phenomenological grounds for the formation and functioning of concrete scientific theoretical and legal and historical and legal constructions. To implement the task posed in the article, the key characteristics of both a theory of a philosophical type and ideals, norms and characteristics of scientific knowledge are examined in detail. The revealed difference is extrapolated to the relationship between the theory of law as a product of scientific creativity and the philosophy of law as a construction that sets basic philosophical meanings. As an example of the foundations of the scientific theories of progress, state, morality and law developed by the philosophy of law and the state, the author gives the views and thinkers of the West European philosophical classics T. Hobbes, J.-J. Russo, I. Kant, G.V.F. Hegel. It was their philosophical concepts that predetermined the images of theoretical and historical-legal doctrines of the XVIII, XIX, XX and even the beginning of the XXI centuries. Thus, the attitude of the philosophy of law and the theory of law is built along the «vertical»: from the ontological foundation to the construction of theoretical and historical and historical legal scientific constructions.

Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life: An Exploration of Scientific Creativity

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 346
Author(s):  
John W. Servos ◽  
Frederic Lawrence Holmes
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Creativity

The Small Mammal Project: Engaging Students as Scientists

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-206
Author(s):  
Erika V. Iyengar ◽  
Paul T. Meier ◽  
Rachel E. Hamelers
Keyword(s):  
College Courses ◽  
Scientific Process ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Scientific Investigations ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Upper Level ◽  
Multiple Species ◽  
Dissemination Of Results ◽  
Scientific Questions

This article describes a sustained, student-driven, inquiry-based set of activities meant to illuminate the scientific process from the initial scientific questions to oral dissemination of results. It is appropriate for science majors and nonmajors, advanced high school through upper-level college courses. Involving students in hands-on, self-driven investigations will allow them to see the challenges of quantitative scientific investigations, and the role of scientific creativity in experimental design and interpretation. This project allows a large group of students to engage in the type of research project often only available to students working one-on-one with instructors or in research labs. This activity requires skeletons of multiple species of small mammals, but there are many ways to alter the project to suit available resources. We expect that students involved in hands-on, self-directed scientific investigations early in their academic careers are less likely to view science as a mere accumulation of facts and more likely to be empowered to participate later in more sustained scientific investigations.

scholarly journals The Impact of Scientific Creative Thinking Skills on Scientific Process Skills

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 01060
Author(s):  
Sibel Demir Kaçan ◽  
Fatma Şahin
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Scientific Process ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Experimental Group

The research aims to determine “the Impact of Scientific Creative Thinking Skills on Scientific Process Skills”. Thus, the research was performed with 24 teacher candidates in the control group and 24 teacher candidates in the experimental group in the second class of the Department of Science Teaching in a university in Istanbul Province. In the experimental group of the research, the laboratory program to be designed by the researchers on the basis of scientific discussion and research; and in the control group, the conventionally designed laboratory program were applied for an academic semester. The research data was gained through “Scientific Creativity Test” to be developed by Hu and Adey [14] and adapted by Kadayıfçı [16]; “Scientific Process Skills Test” to be developed by Okey, Wise and Burns, and adapted by Geban, Aşkar and Özkan into Turkish. The conclusions to be reached by the research are in favour of the experimental group and the last application, and it has positive impact on the opinions of the teacher candidates related with the development of the scientific creativity skills.

Legal support for the creation and use of genetic technologies in medicine

2020 ◽  
pp. 77-78
Author(s):  
В.В. Лапаева
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Human Genome ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Genetic Integrity ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Genetic Technologies ◽  
Genomic Editing ◽  
The Given ◽  
Proper Balance

Правовая политика России в сфере создания и применения генетических технологий в медицине не обеспечивает в должной мере баланс между системой прав человека, гарантирующих защиту его достоинства и охрану здоровья, и свободой научного творчества. Несогласованность этих прав человека проявляется в том, что при отсутствии запретов на исследования с применением технологий наследуемого редактирования генома человека законодательство лишает патентоспособности любые технологии по модификации генетической целостности клеток зародышевой линии человека. Последовательный правовой подход предполагает введение ограничений на возможность геномного редактирования зародышевой линии и запрета на патентование способов такого редактирования, не выходящего за рамки заданных ограничений. При разработке такого похода целесообразно учесть опыт Великобритании. The Russian legal policy in the field of the medicine genetic technologies creation and application does not provide a proper balance between the system of human rights that guarantee the protection of its dignity and health, and the freedom of scientific creativity. The non-coordination of these human rights is manifested in the fact that in the absence of prohibitions on research using technologies of human genome inherited editing, the law deprives patentability of any technology for modifying the genetic integrity of human germline cells. A consistent legal approach involves the restrictions on the possibility of the germ line genomic editing and the prohibition of patenting the methods of such editing, which does not go beyond the given restrictions. It is advisable to take into account the experience of Great Britain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document