Effects of pulse rate and electrode array design on intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users

2004 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 2258-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Kreft ◽  
Gail S. Donaldson ◽  
David A. Nelson
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Mistrík ◽  
Claude Jolly ◽  
Daniel Sieber ◽  
Ingeborg Hochmair

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Young Lee ◽  
Sung Hwa Hong ◽  
Il Joon Moon ◽  
Eun Yeon Kim ◽  
Eunjoo Baek ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Somers ◽  
Christopher J. Long ◽  
Tom Francart

AbstractThe cochlear implant is one of the most successful medical prostheses, allowing deaf and severely hearing-impaired persons to hear again by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. A trained audiologist adjusts the stimulation settings for good speech understanding, known as “fitting” the implant. This process is based on subjective feedback from the user, making it time-consuming and challenging, especially in paediatric or communication-impaired populations. Furthermore, fittings only happen during infrequent sessions at a clinic, and therefore cannot take into account variable factors that affect the user’s hearing, such as physiological changes and different listening environments. Objective audiometry, in which brain responses evoked by auditory stimulation are collected and analysed, removes the need for active patient participation. However, recording of brain responses still requires expensive equipment that is cumbersome to use. An elegant solution is to record the neural signals using the implant itself. We demonstrate for the first time the recording of continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) signals from the implanted intracochlear electrode array in human subjects, using auditory evoked potentials originating from different brain regions. This was done using a temporary recording set-up with a percutaneous connector used for research purposes. Furthermore, we show that the response morphologies and amplitudes depend crucially on the recording electrode configuration. The integration of an EEG system into cochlear implants paves the way towards chronic neuro-monitoring of hearing-impaired patients in their everyday environment, and neuro-steered hearing prostheses, which can autonomously adjust their output based on neural feedback.


Author(s):  
Philipp Aebischer ◽  
Georgios Mantokoudis ◽  
Stefan Weder ◽  
Lukas Anschutz ◽  
Marco Caversaccio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4144
Author(s):  
Ohad Cohen ◽  
Jean-Yves Sichel ◽  
Chanan Shaul ◽  
Itay Chen ◽  
J. Thomas Roland ◽  
...  

Although malpositioning of the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array is rare in patients with normal anatomy, when occurring it may result in reduced hearing outcome. In addition to intraoperative electrophysiologic tests, imaging is an important modality to assess correct electrode array placement. The purpose of this report was to assess the incidence and describe cases in which intraoperative plain radiographs detected a malpositioned array. Intraoperative anti-Stenver’s view plain X-rays are conducted routinely in all CI surgeries in our tertiary center before awakening the patient and breaking the sterile field. Data of patients undergoing 399 CI surgeries were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 355 had normal inner ear and temporal bone anatomy. Patients with intra or extracochlear malpositioned electrode arrays demonstrated in the intraoperative X-ray were described. There were four cases of electrode array malposition out of 355 implantations with normal anatomy (1.1%): two tip fold-overs, one extracochlear placement and one partial insertion. All electrodes were reinserted immediately; repeated radiographs were normal and the patients achieved good hearing function. Intraoperative plain anti-Stenver’s view X-rays are valuable to confirm electrode array location, allowing correction before the conclusion of surgery. These radiographs are cheaper, faster, and emit much less radiation than other imaging options, making them a viable cost-effective tool in patients with normal anatomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 108235
Author(s):  
Samuel Söderqvist ◽  
Satu Lamminmäki ◽  
Antti Aarnisalo ◽  
Timo Hirvonen ◽  
Saku T. Sinkkonen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Spiers ◽  
Tina Cardamone ◽  
John B. Furness ◽  
Jonathan C. M. Clark ◽  
James F. Patrick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document