scholarly journals Retraction for Wu et al., “Substrate-Specific Differential Gene Expression and RNA Editing in the Brown Rot Fungus Fomitopsis pinicola ”

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baojun Wu ◽  
Jill Gaskell ◽  
Benjamin W. Held ◽  
Cristina Toapanta ◽  
Thu Vuong ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baojun Wu ◽  
Jill Gaskell ◽  
Benjamin W. Held ◽  
Cristina Toapanta ◽  
Thu V. Vuong ◽  
...  

All species of wood-decaying fungi occur on a characteristic range of substrates (host plants), which may be broad or narrow. Understanding the mechanisms that allow fungi to grow on particular substrates is important for both fungal ecology and applied uses of different feedstocks in industrial processes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baojun Wu ◽  
Jill Gaskell ◽  
Benjamin W. Held ◽  
Cristina Toapanta ◽  
Thu Vuong ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTWood-decaying fungi tend to have characteristic substrate ranges that partly define their ecological niche.Fomitopsis pinicolais a brown rot species of Polyporales that is reported on 82 species of softwoods and 42 species of hardwoods. We analyzed the gene expression levels and RNA editing profiles ofF. pinicolafrom submerged cultures with ground wood powder (sampled at 5 days) or solid wood wafers (sampled at 10 and 30 days), using aspen, pine, and spruce substrates (aspen was used only in submerged cultures).Fomitopsis pinicolaexpressed similar sets of wood-degrading enzymes typical of brown rot fungi across all culture conditions and time points. Nevertheless, differential gene expression and RNA editing were observed across all pairwise comparisons of substrates and time points. Genes exhibiting differential expression and RNA editing encode diverse enzymes with known or potential function in brown rot decay, including laccase, benzoquinone reductase, aryl alcohol oxidase, cytochrome P450s, and various glycoside hydrolases. There was no overlap between differentially expressed and differentially edited genes, suggesting that these may provideF. pinicolawith independent mechanisms for responding to different conditions. Comparing transcriptomes from submerged cultures and wood wafers, we found that culture conditions had a greater impact on global expression profiles than substrate wood species. In contrast, the suites of genes subject to RNA editing were much less affected by culture conditions. These findings highlight the need for standardization of culture conditions in studies of gene expression in wood-decaying fungi.IMPORTANCEAll species of wood-decaying fungi occur on a characteristic range of substrates (host plants), which may be broad or narrow. Understanding the mechanisms that enable fungi to grow on particular substrates is important for both fungal ecology and applied uses of different feedstocks in industrial processes. We grew the wood-decaying polyporeFomitopsis pinicolaon three different wood species, aspen, pine, and spruce, under various culture conditions. We examined both gene expression (transcription levels) and RNA editing (posttranscriptional modification of RNA, which can potentially yield different proteins from the same gene). We found thatF. pinicolais able to modify both gene expression and RNA editing profiles across different substrate species and culture conditions. Many of the genes involved encode enzymes with known or predicted functions in wood decay. This work provides clues to how wood-decaying fungi may adjust their arsenal of decay enzymes to accommodate different host substrates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackson Townsend ◽  
Heather A. Hundley

Background and Hypothesis: RNA editing is one of several mechanisms regulating gene expression. One type of RNA editing, the deamination of adenosine to inosine, is carried out by ADAR enzymes. ADAR enzymes are essential for neural function and aberrant editing is implicated in various forms of neuropathology. C. elegans lacking the RNA editing enzyme, ADR-2, are viable allowing us to ascertain how loss of RNA editing affects neural gene expression. The effects of loss of adr-2 on neural gene expression will be analyzed in both the first larval (L1) and young adult stages. We hypothesize that the transcriptome will change depending on life stage and the presence of ADR-2. Methods: Three replicates of neural cells isolated from wild type and adr-2(-) L1 and young adult stage animals were obtained. Total RNA was extracted from each population and mRNA was isolated using an oligo-dT bead. The mRNA was fragmented, and reverse transcribed to generate a complentary DNA (cDNA) library. The cDNA was sequenced by a facility at Indiana University. Quality of the library was evaluated using FASTqc. DE-seq2 software evaluated the differential gene expression. Results: I examined differential gene expression in two life stages of the WT and adr-2 neural samples. After obtaining the differentially expressed genes, the portions of the transcriptome that require ADR-2 was determined. WT young adults showed increased (3715) and decreased (2504) expression of neural genes when compared to the L1 stage. Many differentially expressed genes required adr-2 (~40% of the upregulated and 78% of the downregulated genes.) In addition, some genes were uniquely altered (631 upregulated, 196 downregulated) in the absence of adr-2. Conclusion and Potential Impact: The life stage and presence of ADR-2 alter the neural transcriptome and this function changes throughout development. Future studies will determine whether these genes are altered due to the lack of RNA editing or binding by ADR-2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document