scholarly journals Repositioning Basic Residues in the M Domain of the Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (23) ◽  
pp. 11222-11229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Callahan ◽  
John W. Wills
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Particle Production ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Particle Release ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Acidic Phospholipids

ABSTRACT The first 86 residues of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein form a membrane-binding (M) domain that directs Gag to the plasma membrane during budding. Unlike other retroviral Gag proteins, RSV Gag is not myristylated; however, the RSV M domain does contain 11 basic residues that could potentially interact with acidic phospholipids in the plasma membrane. To investigate this possibility, we analyzed mutants in which basic residues in the M domain were replaced with asparagines or glutamines. The data show that neutralizing as few as two basic residues in the M domain blocked particle release and prevented Gag from localizing to the plasma membrane. Though not as severe, single neutralizations also diminished budding and, when expressed in the context of proviral clones, reduced the ability of RSV to spread in cell cultures. To further explore the role of basic residues in particle production, we added lysines to new positions in the M domain. Using this approach, we found that the budding efficiency of RSV Gag can be improved by adding pairs of lysines and that the basic residues in the M domain can be repositioned without affecting particle release. These data provide the first gain-of-function evidence for the importance of basic residues in a retroviral M domain and support a model in which RSV Gag binds to the plasma membrane via electrostatic interactions.

scholarly journals In Vivo Interference of Rous Sarcoma Virus Budding by cis Expression of a WW Domain

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 2789-2795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
John W. Wills
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Ww Domain ◽  
Particle Release ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Membrane Budding

ABSTRACT For all enveloped viruses, the actual mechanism by which nascent virus particles separate or “pinch off” from the cell surface is largely unknown. In the case of retroviruses, the Gag protein drives the budding process, and the virus release step is directed by the late (L) assembly domain within Gag. A PPPPY motif within the L domain of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was previously characterized as being critical for the release of virions and shown to interact in vitro with the WW domain of Yes-associated protein (Yap). To determine whether WW domain-L domain interactions can occur in vivo, we attempted to interfere with the host cell machinery normally recruited to the site of budding by inserting this WW domain in different locations within Gag. At a C-terminal location, the WWYap domain had no effect on budding, suggesting that the intervening I domains (which provide the major region of Gag-Gag interaction) prevent its access to the L domain. When positioned on the other side of the I domains closer to the L domain, the WWYap domain resulted in a dramatic interference of particle release, and confocal microscopy revealed a block to budding on the plasma membrane. Budding was restored by attachment of the heterologous L domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag, which does not bind WWYap. These findings suggest that cis expression of WW domains can interfere with RSV particle release in vivo via specific, high-affinity interactions at the site of assembly on the plasma membrane, thus preventing host factor accessibility to the L domain and subsequent virus-cell separation. In addition, they suggest that L domain-specific host factors function after Gag proteins begin to interact.

scholarly journals Visualizing Association of the Retroviral Gag Protein with Unspliced Viral RNA in the Nucleus

mBio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Kaddis Maldonado ◽  
Breanna Rice ◽  
Eunice C. Chen ◽  
Kevin M. Tuffy ◽  
Estelle F. Chiari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Live Cell ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus

ABSTRACT Packaging of genomic RNA (gRNA) by retroviruses is essential for infectivity, yet the subcellular site of the initial interaction between the Gag polyprotein and gRNA remains poorly defined. Because retroviral particles are released from the plasma membrane, it was previously thought that Gag proteins initially bound to gRNA in the cytoplasm or at the plasma membrane. However, the Gag protein of the avian retrovirus Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) undergoes active nuclear trafficking, which is required for efficient gRNA encapsidation (L. Z. Scheifele, R. A. Garbitt, J. D. Rhoads, and L. J. Parent, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3944–3949, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062652199; R. Garbitt-Hirst, S. P. Kenney, and L. J. Parent, J Virol 83:6790–6797, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00101-09). These results raise the intriguing possibility that the primary contact between Gag and gRNA might occur in the nucleus. To examine this possibility, we created a RSV proviral construct that includes 24 tandem repeats of MS2 RNA stem-loops, making it possible to track RSV viral RNA (vRNA) in live cells in which a fluorophore-conjugated MS2 coat protein is coexpressed. Using confocal microscopy, we observed that both wild-type Gag and a nuclear export mutant (Gag.L219A) colocalized with vRNA in the nucleus. In live-cell time-lapse images, the wild-type Gag protein trafficked together with vRNA as a single ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex in the nucleoplasm near the nuclear periphery, appearing to traverse the nuclear envelope into the cytoplasm. Furthermore, biophysical imaging methods suggest that Gag and the unspliced vRNA physically interact in the nucleus. Taken together, these data suggest that RSV Gag binds unspliced vRNA to export it from the nucleus, possibly for packaging into virions as the viral genome. IMPORTANCE Retroviruses cause severe diseases in animals and humans, including cancer and acquired immunodeficiency syndromes. To propagate infection, retroviruses assemble new virus particles that contain viral proteins and unspliced vRNA to use as gRNA. Despite the critical requirement for gRNA packaging, the molecular mechanisms governing the identification and selection of gRNA by the Gag protein remain poorly understood. In this report, we demonstrate that the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein colocalizes with unspliced vRNA in the nucleus in the interchromatin space. Using live-cell confocal imaging, RSV Gag and unspliced vRNA were observed to move together from inside the nucleus across the nuclear envelope, suggesting that the Gag-gRNA complex initially forms in the nucleus and undergoes nuclear export into the cytoplasm as a viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex.

scholarly journals Membrane Binding of the Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein Is Cooperative and Dependent on the Spacer Peptide Assembly Domain

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 2473-2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dick ◽  
Marilia Barros ◽  
Danni Jin ◽  
Mathias Lösche ◽  
Volker M. Vogt
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Membrane Binding ◽  
Membrane Interaction ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Peptide Assembly ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus

ABSTRACTThe principles underlying membrane binding and assembly of retroviral Gag proteins into a lattice are understood. However, little is known about how these processes are related. Using purified Rous sarcoma virus Gag and Gag truncations, we studied the interrelation of Gag-Gag interaction and Gag-membrane interaction. Both by liposome binding and by surface plasmon resonance on a supported bilayer, Gag bound to membranes much more tightly than did matrix (MA), the isolated membrane binding domain. In principle, this difference could be explained either by protein-protein interactions leading to cooperativity in membrane binding or by the simultaneous interaction of the N-terminal MA and the C-terminal nucleocapsid (NC) of Gag with the bilayer, since both are highly basic. However, we found that NC was not required for strong membrane binding. Instead, the spacer peptide assembly domain (SPA), a putative 24-residue helical sequence comprising the 12-residue SP segment of Gag and overlapping the capsid (CA) C terminus and the NC N terminus, was required. SPA is known to be critical for proper assembly of the immature Gag lattice. A single amino acid mutation in SPA that abrogates assemblyin vitrodramatically reduced binding of Gag to liposomes.In vivo, plasma membrane localization was dependent on SPA. Disulfide cross-linking based on ectopic Cys residues showed that the contacts between Gag proteins on the membrane are similar to the known contacts in virus-like particles. Taken together, we interpret these results to mean that Gag membrane interaction is cooperative in that it depends on the ability of Gag to multimerize.IMPORTANCEThe retroviral structural protein Gag has three major domains. The N-terminal MA domain interacts directly with the plasma membrane (PM) of cells. The central CA domain, together with immediately adjoining sequences, facilitates the assembly of thousands of Gag molecules into a lattice. The C-terminal NC domain interacts with the genome, resulting in packaging of viral RNA. For assemblyin vitrowith purified Gag, in the absence of membranes, binding of NC to nucleic acid somehow facilitates further Gag-Gag interactions that lead to formation of the Gag lattice. The contributions of MA-mediated membrane binding to virus particle assembly are not well understood. Here, we report that in the absence of nucleic acid, membranes provide a platform that facilitates Gag-Gag interactions. This study demonstrates that the binding of Gag, but not of MA, to membranes is cooperative and identifies SPA as a major factor that controls this cooperativity.

scholarly journals Genetic Determinants of Rous Sarcoma Virus Particle Size

1998 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 564-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neel K. Krishna ◽  
Stephen Campbell ◽  
Volker M. Vogt ◽  
John W. Wills
Keyword(s):  
Particle Size ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Interaction Domains ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Exhaustive Study ◽  
Rna Interaction

ABSTRACT The Gag proteins of retroviruses are the only viral products required for the release of membrane-enclosed particles by budding from the host cell. Particles released when these proteins are expressed alone are identical to authentic virions in their rates of budding, proteolytic processing, and core morphology, as well as density and size. We have previously mapped three very small, modular regions of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein that are necessary for budding. These assembly domains constitute only 20% of RSV Gag, and alterations within them block or severely impair particle formation. Regions outside of these domains can be deleted without any effect on the density of the particles that are released. However, since density and size are independent parameters for retroviral particles, we employed rate-zonal gradients and electron microscopy in an exhaustive study of mutants lacking the various dispensable segments of Gag to determine which regions would be required to constrain or define the particle dimensions. The only sequence found to be absolutely critical for determining particle size was that of the initial capsid cleavage product, CA-SP, which contains all of the CA sequence plus the spacer peptides located between CA and NC. Some regions of CA-SP appear to be more important than others. In particular, the major homology region does not contribute to defining particle size. Further evidence for interactions among CA-SP domains was obtained from genetic complementation experiments using mutant ΔNC, which lacks the RNA interaction domains in the NC sequence but retains a complete CA-SP sequence. This mutant produces low-density particles heterogeneous in size. It was rescued into particles of normal size and density, but only when the complementing Gag molecules contained the complete CA-SP sequence. We conclude that CA-SP functions during budding in a manner that is independent of the other assembly domains.

scholarly journals Nonsense codons within the Rous sarcoma virus gag gene decrease the stability of unspliced viral RNA.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2760-2768 ◽  
Author(s):  
G F Barker ◽  
K Beemon
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Nonsense Codons ◽  
The Stability

The intracellular accumulation of the unspliced RNA of Rous sarcoma virus was decreased when translation was prematurely terminated by the introduction of nonsense codons within its 5' proximal gene, the gag gene. In contrast, the levels of spliced viral RNAs were not affected in our transient expression assays in chicken cells. Experiments using the transcription inhibitor dactinomycin showed that mutant unspliced RNAs were degraded more rapidly than wild-type RNA. Furthermore, mutant RNAs could be partially stabilized by coexpression of wild-type gag proteins in trans; however, intact gag proteins were not required to maintain the stability of RNAs which did not contain premature termination codons. Thus, termination codons seemed to destabilize the RNA not because of their effect on gag protein function but instead because they disrupted the process of translating the gag region of the RNA. Analysis of double-mutant constructs containing both deletions and termination codons within the gag gene also suggested that the stability of the unspliced RNA was affected by a cis-acting interaction between the RNA and ribosomes.

scholarly journals Alterations in the MA and NC Domains Modulate Phosphoinositide-Dependent Plasma Membrane Localization of the Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein

2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 3609-3615 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nadaraia-Hoke ◽  
D. V. Bann ◽  
T. L. Lochmann ◽  
N. Gudleski-O'Regan ◽  
L. J. Parent
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Membrane Localization ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Plasma Membrane Localization ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus

scholarly journals Hydrodynamic and Membrane Binding Properties of Purified Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (20) ◽  
pp. 10371-10382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dick ◽  
Siddhartha A. K. Datta ◽  
Hirsh Nanda ◽  
Xianyang Fang ◽  
Yi Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Acyl Chain ◽  
Membrane Binding ◽  
Membrane Association ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTPreviously, no retroviral Gag protein has been highly purified in milligram quantities and in a biologically relevant and active form. We have purified Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein and in parallel several truncation mutants of Gag and have studied their biophysical properties and membrane interactionsin vitro. RSV Gag is unusual in that it is not naturally myristoylated. From its ability to assemble into virus-like particlesin vitro, we infer that RSV Gag is biologically active. By size exclusion chromatography and small-angle X-ray scattering, Gag in solution appears extended and flexible, in contrast to previous reports on unmyristoylated HIV-1 Gag, which is compact. However, by neutron reflectometry measurements of RSV Gag bound to a supported bilayer, the protein appears to adopt a more compact, folded-over conformation. At physiological ionic strength, purified Gag binds strongly to liposomes containing acidic lipids. This interaction is stimulated by physiological levels of phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2] and by cholesterol. However, unlike HIV-1 Gag, RSV Gag shows no sensitivity to acyl chain saturation. In contrast with full-length RSV Gag, the purified MA domain of Gag binds to liposomes only weakly. Similarly, both an N-terminally truncated version of Gag that is missing the MA domain and a C-terminally truncated version that is missing the NC domain bind only weakly. These results imply that NC contributes to membrane interactionin vitro, either by directly contacting acidic lipids or by promoting Gag multimerization.IMPORTANCERetroviruses like HIV assemble at and bud from the plasma membrane of cells. Assembly requires the interaction between thousands of Gag molecules to form a lattice. Previous work indicated that lattice formation at the plasma membrane is influenced by the conformation of monomeric HIV. We have extended this work to the more tractable RSV Gag. Our results show that RSV Gag is highly flexible and can adopt a folded-over conformation on a lipid bilayer, implicating both the N and C termini in membrane binding. In addition, binding of Gag to membranes is diminished when either terminal domain is truncated. RSV Gag membrane association is significantly less sensitive than HIV Gag membrane association to lipid acyl chain saturation. These findings shed light on Gag assembly and membrane binding, critical steps in the viral life cycle and an untapped target for antiretroviral drugs.

scholarly journals PR Domain of Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Causes an Assembly/Budding Defect in Insect Cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 4407-4412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc C. Johnson ◽  
Heather M. Scobie ◽  
Volker M. Vogt
Keyword(s):  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Electron Microscopy Analysis ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Microscopy Analysis ◽  
Pr Domain

ABSTRACT While baculovirus expression of Gag proteins from numerous retroviruses has led reliably to production of virus-like particles (VLPs), we observed that expression of Rous sarcoma virus Gag failed to produce VLPs. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed that the Gag protein reached the plasma membrane but was unable to correctly form particles. Addition of a myristylation signal had no effect on the budding defect, but deletion of the PR domain of Gag restored normal budding. The resulting VLPs were morphologically distinct from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 VLPs expressed in parallel.

scholarly journals Lysines Close to the Rous Sarcoma Virus Late Domain Critical for Budding

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (19) ◽  
pp. 10606-10616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared L. Spidel ◽  
Rebecca C. Craven ◽  
Carol B. Wilson ◽  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
Huating Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Leukemia Virus ◽  
Cell Leukemia Virus Type ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Human T Cell ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
T Cell Leukemia Virus ◽  
Sarcoma Virus

ABSTRACT The release of retroviruses from the plasma membrane requires host factors that are believed to be recruited to the site of budding by the late (L) domain of the virus-encoded Gag protein. The L domain of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) has been shown to interact with a ubiquitin (Ub) ligase, and budding of this virus is dependent on Ub. RSV is similar to other retroviruses in that it contains ∼100 molecules of Ub, but it is unique in that none of these molecules has been found to be conjugated to Gag. If transient ubiquitination of RSV Gag is required for budding, then replacement of the target lysine(s) with arginine should prevent the addition of Ub and reduce budding. Based on known sites of ubiquitination in other viruses, the important lysines would likely reside near the L domain. In RSV, there are five lysines located just upstream of the L domain in a region of the matrix (MA) protein that is dispensable for membrane binding, and replacement of these with arginine (mutant 1-5KR) reduced budding 80 to 90%. The block to budding was found to be on the plasma membrane; however, the few virions that were released had normal size, morphology, and infectivity. Budding was restored when any one of the residues was changed back to lysine or when lysines were inserted in novel positions, either within this region of MA or within the downstream p10 sequence. Moreover, the 1-5KR mutant could be rescued into particles by coexpression of budding-competent Gag molecules. These data argue that the phenotype of mutant 1-5KR is not due to a conformational defect. Consistent with the idea that efficient budding requires a specific role for lysines, human T-cell leukemia virus type 1, which does not bud well compared to RSV and lacks lysines close to its L domain, was found to be released at a higher level upon introduction of lysines near its L domain. This report strongly supports the hypothesis that ubiquitination of the RSV Gag protein (and perhaps those of other retroviruses) is needed for efficient budding.

Nonsense codons within the Rous sarcoma virus gag gene decrease the stability of unspliced viral RNA

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2760-2768
Author(s):  
G F Barker ◽  
K Beemon
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gag Protein ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Nonsense Codons ◽  
The Stability

The intracellular accumulation of the unspliced RNA of Rous sarcoma virus was decreased when translation was prematurely terminated by the introduction of nonsense codons within its 5' proximal gene, the gag gene. In contrast, the levels of spliced viral RNAs were not affected in our transient expression assays in chicken cells. Experiments using the transcription inhibitor dactinomycin showed that mutant unspliced RNAs were degraded more rapidly than wild-type RNA. Furthermore, mutant RNAs could be partially stabilized by coexpression of wild-type gag proteins in trans; however, intact gag proteins were not required to maintain the stability of RNAs which did not contain premature termination codons. Thus, termination codons seemed to destabilize the RNA not because of their effect on gag protein function but instead because they disrupted the process of translating the gag region of the RNA. Analysis of double-mutant constructs containing both deletions and termination codons within the gag gene also suggested that the stability of the unspliced RNA was affected by a cis-acting interaction between the RNA and ribosomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document