scholarly journals Transcription initiation complexes and upstream activation with RNA polymerase II lacking the C-terminal domain of the largest subunit.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 5562-5564 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Buratowski ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Adenovirus Type ◽  
Late Promoter ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Late Transcription ◽  
Major Late Promoter

RNA polymerase II assembles with other factors on the adenovirus type 2 major late promoter to generate pairs of transcription initiation complexes resolvable by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. The pairing of the complexes is caused by the presence or absence of the C-terminal domain of the largest subunit. This domain is not required for transcription stimulation by the major late transcription factor in vitro.

Transcription initiation complexes and upstream activation with RNA polymerase II lacking the C-terminal domain of the largest subunit

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 5562-5564
Author(s):  
S Buratowski ◽  
P A Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Adenovirus Type ◽  
Late Promoter ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Late Transcription ◽  
Major Late Promoter

RNA polymerase II assembles with other factors on the adenovirus type 2 major late promoter to generate pairs of transcription initiation complexes resolvable by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. The pairing of the complexes is caused by the presence or absence of the C-terminal domain of the largest subunit. This domain is not required for transcription stimulation by the major late transcription factor in vitro.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II elongation complexes paused after the synthesis of 15- or 35-base transcripts have different structures

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1508-1522
Author(s):  
S C Linn ◽  
D S Luse
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Adenovirus Type ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Adenovirus Type 2

We have purified specific RNA polymerase II elongation intermediates initiated at the adenovirus type 2 major late promoter and paused either 15 or 35 to 36 bases downstream of the transcription initiation site. Transcription was arrested at these two sites by combining modification of the promoter sequence with limitation of appropriate nucleotide concentrations in the in vitro reaction. The resultant complexes were remarkably stable and could be purified away from free DNA and contaminating protein-DNA complexes, without loss of activity, by the use of sucrose gradient sedimentation and low-ionic-strength polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The complexes were characterized by both DNase I and o-phenanthroline-copper ion nuclease protection assays. The DNase I footprints revealed that the structures of the 15- and 35- to 36-nucleotide transcription complexes differed from those previously reported for an adenovirus type 2 major late preinitiation complex and a subsequent intermediate formed upon addition of ATP. Furthermore, the 35- to 36-nucleotide complex protected a significantly smaller portion of the template than the 15-nucleotide species and migrated at a slightly higher rate in polyacrylamide gels. These observations suggest that changes in structural organization may continue to occur in transcription complexes which are already committed to elongation.

scholarly journals RNA polymerase II elongation complexes paused after the synthesis of 15- or 35-base transcripts have different structures.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1508-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
S C Linn ◽  
D S Luse
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Adenovirus Type ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Adenovirus Type 2

We have purified specific RNA polymerase II elongation intermediates initiated at the adenovirus type 2 major late promoter and paused either 15 or 35 to 36 bases downstream of the transcription initiation site. Transcription was arrested at these two sites by combining modification of the promoter sequence with limitation of appropriate nucleotide concentrations in the in vitro reaction. The resultant complexes were remarkably stable and could be purified away from free DNA and contaminating protein-DNA complexes, without loss of activity, by the use of sucrose gradient sedimentation and low-ionic-strength polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The complexes were characterized by both DNase I and o-phenanthroline-copper ion nuclease protection assays. The DNase I footprints revealed that the structures of the 15- and 35- to 36-nucleotide transcription complexes differed from those previously reported for an adenovirus type 2 major late preinitiation complex and a subsequent intermediate formed upon addition of ATP. Furthermore, the 35- to 36-nucleotide complex protected a significantly smaller portion of the template than the 15-nucleotide species and migrated at a slightly higher rate in polyacrylamide gels. These observations suggest that changes in structural organization may continue to occur in transcription complexes which are already committed to elongation.

scholarly journals A three-step pathway of transcription initiation leading to promoter clearance at an activation RNA polymerase II promoter.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1614-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Jiang ◽  
M Yan ◽  
J D Gralla
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Elongation Complex ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Step Model ◽  
Dna Strands

The progress of transcription bubbles during inhibition in vitro was followed in order to learn how RNA polymerase II begins transcription at the activated adenovirus E4 promoter. The issues addressed include the multiple roles of ATP, the potential effect of polymerase C-terminal domain phosphorylation, and the ability of polymerase to clear the promoter for reinitiation. The results lead to a three-step model for the transition from closed complex to elongation complex, two steps of which use ATP independently. In the first step, studied previously, ATP is hydrolyzed to open the DNA strands over the start site. In a second step, apparently independent of ATP, transcription bubbles move into the initial transcribed region where RNA synthesis can stall. In the third step, transcripts can be made as polymerase is released from these stalled positions with the assistance of an ATP-dependent process, likely phosphorylation of the polymerase C-terminal domain. After this third step, the promoter becomes cleared, allowing for the reinitiation of transcription.

scholarly journals Tyr1 phosphorylation promotes the phosphorylation of Ser2 on the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II by P-TEFb

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua E. Mayfield ◽  
Seema Irani ◽  
Edwin E. Escobar ◽  
Zhao Zhang ◽  
Nathanial T. Burkholder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Analysis ◽  
Spectrometry Analysis ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

SummaryThe Positive Transcription Elongation Factor b (P-TEFb) phosphorylates Ser2 residues of RNA polymerase II’s C-terminal domain (CTD) and is essential for the transition from transcription initiation to elongation in vivo. Surprisingly, P-TEFb exhibits Ser5 phosphorylation activity in vitro. The mechanism garnering Ser2 specificity to P-TEFb remains elusive and hinders understanding of the transition from transcription initiation to elongation. Through in vitro reconstruction of CTD phosphorylation, mass spectrometry analysis, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis we uncover a mechanism by which Tyr1 phosphorylation directs the kinase activity of P-TEFb and alters its specificity from Ser5 to Ser2. The loss of Tyr1 phosphorylation causes a reduction of phosphorylated Ser2 and accumulation of RNA polymerase II in the promoter region as detected by ChIP-seq. We demonstrate the ability of Tyr1 phosphorylation to generate a heterogeneous CTD modification landscape that expands the CTD’s coding potential. These findings provide direct experimental evidence for a combinatorial CTD phosphorylation code wherein previously installed modifications direct the identity and abundance of subsequent coding events by influencing the behavior of downstream enzymes.

scholarly journals Tyr1 phosphorylation promotes phosphorylation of Ser2 on the C-terminal domain of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II by P-TEFb

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua E Mayfield ◽  
Seema Irani ◽  
Edwin E Escobar ◽  
Zhao Zhang ◽  
Nathaniel T Burkholder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Analysis ◽  
Spectrometry Analysis ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Ctd Phosphorylation

The Positive Transcription Elongation Factor b (P-TEFb) phosphorylates Ser2 residues of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit (RPB1) of RNA polymerase II and is essential for the transition from transcription initiation to elongation in vivo. Surprisingly, P-TEFb exhibits Ser5 phosphorylation activity in vitro. The mechanism garnering Ser2 specificity to P-TEFb remains elusive and hinders understanding of the transition from transcription initiation to elongation. Through in vitro reconstruction of CTD phosphorylation, mass spectrometry analysis, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis, we uncover a mechanism by which Tyr1 phosphorylation directs the kinase activity of P-TEFb and alters its specificity from Ser5 to Ser2. The loss of Tyr1 phosphorylation causes an accumulation of RNA polymerase II in the promoter region as detected by ChIP-seq. We demonstrate the ability of Tyr1 phosphorylation to generate a heterogeneous CTD modification landscape that expands the CTD’s coding potential. These findings provide direct experimental evidence for a combinatorial CTD phosphorylation code wherein previously installed modifications direct the identity and abundance of subsequent coding events by influencing the behavior of downstream enzymes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document