Structural basis of INTAC-regulated transcription

For the majority of expressed eukaryotic genes, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) forms a paused elongation complex (PEC) and undergoes promoter-proximal pausing downstream of the transcription start site. The polymerase either proceeds into productive elongation or undergoes promoter-proximal premature transcription termination. It remains incompletely understood how transcription is regulated at this stage. Here, we determined the structure of PEC bound to INTAC, an Integrator-containing PP2A complex, at near-atomic resolution. The structure shows that INTAC partially wraps around PEC through multiple contacts, permitting the memetic nascent RNA to run into substrate-entry tunnel of the endonuclease subunit INTS11 of INTAC for cleavage. Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD) winds over INTAC backbone module through multiple anchors and is suspended above the phosphatase of INTAC for dephosphorylation. Biochemical analysis shows that INTAC-PEC association requires unphosphorylated CTD and could tolerate CTD phosphorylation, suggesting an INTAC-mediated persistent CTD dephosphorylation followed by reinforcement of the INTAC-PEC complex. Our study reveals how INTAC binds PEC and orchestrates RNA cleavage and CTD dephosphorylation, two critical events in generating premature transcription termination.

Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Reveals a Third Breakpoint Cluster Region and New Partner Genes in the KMT2A Recombinome

Chromosomal rearrangements of the KMT2A gene are associated with acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. The large number of known KMT2A fusions (>100) renders a precise diagnosis a demanding task. More than 50% of all KMT2A partner genes have been analyzed at the DCAL, including the novel partner genes BCAS4, FAM13A, RANBP3, and STK4. Even though all KMT2A rearrangements are associated with high-risk acute leukemia, the outcome (poor or very poor) is influenced by the partner gene. So far, we have analyzed more than 3,200 patients positive for a KMT2A rearrangement. The breakpoints of these cases are located mainly in the major breakpoint cluster region (bcr1) and to a small extent in the recently described minor bcr (bcr2). A small number of breakpoints were also found outside of these two bcrs. Most of these patients were analyzed by long distance inverse (LDI)- or multiplex-PCR which only cover bcr1. More recently, we used targeted KMT2A-NGS with whole gene coverage in over 450 patients, which was initially applied selectively in patients negative by LDI- and multiplex-PCR and then used more widely. Within the KMT2A-NGS group, 410 patients had bcr1 breakpoints mainly between the KMT2A exons 7 and 13, while 46 patients bcr2 breakpoints mainly between exons 20 and 24. Of note, five patients had their breakpoint outside of these two bcrs: three of them within intron 2 and no functional KMT2A rearrangement; the other two within intron 35 and intron 36, fusing almost the whole KMT2A gene in frame to the respective partner genes ARHGEF12 and MLLT4. These two breakpoints may define a third and rare bcr (bcr3), although further cases are needed to support this hypothesis. Interestingly, 70 patients displayed a 3'-KMT2A deletion, indicating that the number of terminal deletions is higher than described previously. Two patients had a 5'-KMT2A deletion. All deletions started or ended in bcr1 and bcr2. We also observed a striking difference in the distribution of partner genes between bcr1 and bcr2. The most frequent translocation partners fused to bcr1 sites are transcription factors, while the partner genes linked to bcr2 sites generally code for cytosolic proteins. In bcr1, the 4 most frequent partner genes AFF1, MLLT3, MLLT1, and MLLT10, found in 80% of cases, all code for transcription factors that are part of the super elongation complex (SEC). These fusions therefore all lead to disruption of the hematopoietic lineage commitment. In contrast in bcr2, 3 partner genes USP2, MLLT4, and USP8 account for 85% of the cases. USP2 and USP8 are ubiquitin specific peptidases involved in cell signaling and exclusively fused to bcr2 in KMT2A. While MLLT4 is found as a partner in bcr1, bcr2 and bcr3 fusions; unlike other recurrent KMT2A partners linked to bcr1, it is not a transcription factor and it exerts oncogenic potential via dimerization like other cytosolic partners. We hypothesize that the oncogenic properties of USP2 and USP8 are dependent on dimerization like MLLT4 and that the most frequent fusions involving at different bcrs favor different oncogenic mechanisms: bcr1 transactivation and bcr2 dimerization. Further studies are needed to explain why USP2 and USP8 are exclusively associated with bcr2, and why the most frequent partner genes AFF1 and MLLT3 of the bcr1 are less frequent in bcr2. In conclusion, targeted NGS combined with bioinformatic analysis has expanded our knowledge of the KMT2A recombinome to include more fusion partners and has generated new hypotheses for future research on oncogenic mechanisms. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Structure of the human RNA polymerase I elongation complex

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcribes ribosomal DNA and generates RNA for ribosome synthesis. Pol I accounts for the majority of cellular transcription activity and dysregulation of Pol I transcription leads to cancers and ribosomopathies. Despite extensive structural studies of yeast Pol I, structure of human Pol I remains unsolved. Here we determined the structures of the human Pol I in the pre-translocation, post-translocation, and backtracked states at near-atomic resolution. The single-subunit peripheral stalk lacks contacts with the DNA-binding clamp and is more flexible than the two-subunit stalk in yeast Pol I. Compared to yeast Pol I, human Pol I possesses a more closed clamp, which makes more contacts with DNA. The Pol I structure in the post-cleavage backtracked state shows that the C-terminal zinc ribbon of RPA12 inserts into an open funnel and facilitates “dinucleotide cleavage” on mismatched DNA–RNA hybrid. Critical disease-associated mutations are mapped on Pol I regions that are involved in catalysis and complex organization. In summary, the structures provide new sights into human Pol I complex organization and efficient proofreading.

The Expression and Roles of the Super Elongation Complex in Mouse Cochlear Lgr5+ Progenitor Cells

The super elongation complex (SEC) has been reported to play a key role in the proliferation and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. However, the expression pattern and function of the SEC in the inner ear has not been investigated. Here, we studied the inner ear expression pattern of three key SEC components, AFF1, AFF4, and ELL3, and found that these three proteins are all expressed in both cochlear hair cells (HCs)and supporting cells (SCs). We also cultured Lgr5+ inner ear progenitors in vitro for sphere-forming assays and differentiation assays in the presence of the SEC inhibitor flavopiridol. We found that flavopiridol treatment decreased the proliferation ability of Lgr5+ progenitors, while the differentiation ability of Lgr5+ progenitors was not affected. Our results suggest that the SEC might play important roles in regulating inner ear progenitors and thus regulating HC regeneration. Therefore, it will be very meaningful to further investigate the detailed roles of the SEC signaling pathway in the inner ear in vivo in order to develop effective treatments for sensorineural hearing loss.

Promoter-proximal elongation regulates transcription in archaea

Recruitment of RNA polymerase and initiation factors to the promoter is the only known target for transcription activation and repression in archaea. Whether any of the subsequent steps towards productive transcription elongation are involved in regulation is not known. We characterised how the basal transcription machinery is distributed along genes in the archaeon Saccharolobus solfataricus. We discovered a distinct early elongation phase where RNA polymerases sequentially recruit the elongation factors Spt4/5 and Elf1 to form the transcription elongation complex (TEC) before the TEC escapes into productive transcription. TEC escape is rate-limiting for transcription output during exponential growth. Oxidative stress causes changes in TEC escape that correlate with changes in the transcriptome. Our results thus establish that TEC escape contributes to the basal promoter strength and facilitates transcription regulation. Impaired TEC escape coincides with the accumulation of initiation factors at the promoter and recruitment of termination factor aCPSF1 to the early TEC. This suggests two possible mechanisms for how TEC escape limits transcription, physically blocking upstream RNA polymerases during transcription initiation and premature termination of early TECs.

Structural basis of human transcription–DNA repair coupling

Transcription-coupled DNA repair removes bulky DNA lesions from the genome1,2 and protects cells against ultraviolet (UV) irradiation3. Transcription-coupled DNA repair begins when RNA polymerase II (Pol II) stalls at a DNA lesion and recruits the Cockayne syndrome protein CSB, the E3 ubiquitin ligase, CRL4CSA and UV-stimulated scaffold protein A (UVSSA)3. Here we provide five high-resolution structures of Pol II transcription complexes containing human transcription-coupled DNA repair factors and the elongation factors PAF1 complex (PAF) and SPT6. Together with biochemical and published3,4 data, the structures provide a model for transcription–repair coupling. Stalling of Pol II at a DNA lesion triggers replacement of the elongation factor DSIF by CSB, which binds to PAF and moves upstream DNA to SPT6. The resulting elongation complex, ECTCR, uses the CSA-stimulated translocase activity of CSB to pull on upstream DNA and push Pol II forward. If the lesion cannot be bypassed, CRL4CSA spans over the Pol II clamp and ubiquitylates the RPB1 residue K1268, enabling recruitment of TFIIH to UVSSA and DNA repair. Conformational changes in CRL4CSA lead to ubiquitylation of CSB and to release of transcription-coupled DNA repair factors before transcription may continue over repaired DNA.

Opposing functions of the Hda1 complex and histone H2B mono-ubiquitylation in regulating cryptic transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Maintenance of chromatin structure under the disruptive force of transcription requires cooperation among numerous regulatory factors. Histone post-translational modifications can regulate nucleosome stability and influence the disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes during transcription elongation. The Paf1 transcription elongation complex, Paf1C, is required for several transcription-coupled histone modifications, including the mono-ubiquitylation of H2B. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amino acid substitutions in the Rtf1 subunit of Paf1C greatly diminish H2B ubiquitylation and cause transcription to initiate at a cryptic promoter within the coding region of the FLO8 gene, an indicator of chromatin disruption. In a genetic screen to identify factors that functionally interact with Paf1C, we identified mutations in HDA3, a gene encoding a subunit of the Hda1C histone deacetylase, as suppressors of an rtf1 mutation. Absence of Hda1C also suppresses the cryptic initiation phenotype of other mutants defective in H2B ubiquitylation. The genetic interactions between Hda1C and the H2B ubiquitylation pathway appear specific: loss of Hda1C does not suppress the cryptic initiation phenotypes of other chromatin mutants and absence of other histone deacetylases does not suppress the absence of H2B ubiquitylation. Providing further support for an appropriate balance of histone acetylation in regulating cryptic initiation, absence of the Sas3 histone acetyltransferase elevates cryptic initiation in rtf1 mutants. Our data suggest that the H2B ubiquitylation pathway and Hda1C coordinately regulate chromatin structure during transcription elongation and point to a potential role for a histone deacetylase in supporting chromatin accessibility.

Analysis of the PcrA-RNA polymerase complex reveals a helicase interaction motif and a role for PcrA/UvrD helicase in the suppression of R-loops

The PcrA/UvrD helicase binds directly to RNA polymerase (RNAP) but the structural basis for this interaction and its functional significance have remained unclear. In this work we used biochemical assays and hydrogen-deuterium exchange coupled to mass spectrometry to study the PcrA-RNAP complex. We find that PcrA binds tightly to a transcription elongation complex in a manner dependent on protein:protein interaction with the conserved PcrA C-terminal Tudor domain. The helicase binds predominantly to two positions on the surface of RNAP. The PcrA C-terminal domain engages a conserved region in a lineage-specific insert within the β subunit which we identify as a helicase interaction motif present in many other PcrA partner proteins, including the nucleotide excision repair factor UvrB. The catalytic core of the helicase binds near the RNA and DNA exit channels and blocking PcrA activity in vivo leads to the accumulation of R-loops. We propose a role for PcrA as an R-loop suppression factor that helps to minimise conflicts between transcription and other processes on DNA including replication.

CPI-637 as a Potential Bifunctional Latency-Reversing Agent That Targets Both the BRD4 and TIP60 Proteins

The failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been largely responsible for the existence of latent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reservoirs. The “shock and kill” strategy was confirmed to reactivate HIV-1 latent reservoirs by latency-reversing agents (LRAs) for accelerated HIV-1 clearance. However, a single LRA might be insufficient to induce HIV-1 reactivation from latency due to the complexity of the multiple signaling regulatory pathways that establish the HIV-1 latent reservoir. Therefore, combinations of LRAs or dual-mechanism LRAs are urgently needed to purge the latent reservoirs. We demonstrate here for the first time that a dual-target inhibitor with a specific suppressive effect on both BRD4 and TIP60, CPI-637, could reactivate latent HIV-1 in vitro by permitting Tat to bind positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) and assembling Tat-super-elongation complex (SEC) formation. In addition, CPI-637-mediated TIP60 downregulation further stimulated BRD4 dissociation from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, allowing Tat to more effectively bind P-TEFb compared to BRD4 inhibition alone. Much more importantly, CPI-637 exerted a potent synergistic effect but alleviated global T cell activation and blocked viral spread to uninfected bystander CD4+ T cells with minimal cytotoxicity. Our results indicate that CPI-637 opens up the prospect of novel dual-target inhibitors for antagonizing HIV-1 latency and deserves further investigation for development as a promising LRA with a “shock and kill” strategy.