The HIP1 initiator element plays a role in determining the in vitro requirement of the dihydrofolate reductase gene promoter for the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2250-2259
Author(s):  
A B Buermeyer ◽  
N E Thompson ◽  
L A Strasheim ◽  
R R Burgess ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Minimal Promoter ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Promoter Deletions

We examined the ability of purified RNA polymerase (RNAP) II lacking the carboxy-terminal heptapeptide repeat domain (CTD), called RNAP IIB, to transcribe a variety of promoters in HeLa extracts in which endogenous RNAP II activity was inhibited with anti-CTD monoclonal antibodies. Not all promoters were efficiently transcribed by RNAP IIB, and transcription did not correlate with the in vitro strength of the promoter or with the presence of a consensus TATA box. This was best illustrated by the GC-rich, non-TATA box promoters of the bidirectional dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-REP-encoding locus. Whereas the REP promoter was transcribed by RNAP IIB, the DHFR promoter remained inactive after addition of RNAP IIB to the antibody-inhibited reactions. However, both promoters were efficiently transcribed when purified RNAP with an intact CTD was added. We analyzed a series of promoter deletions to identify which cis elements determine the requirement for the CTD of RNAP II. All of the promoter deletions of both DHFR and REP retained the characteristics of their respective full-length promoters, suggesting that the information necessary to specify the requirement for the CTD is contained within approximately 65 bp near the initiation site. Furthermore, a synthetic minimal promoter of DHFR, consisting of a single binding site for Sp1 and a binding site for the HIP1 initiator cloned into a bacterial vector sequence, required RNAP II with an intact CTD for activity in vitro. Since the synthetic minimal promoter of DHFR and the smallest REP promoter deletion are both activated by Sp1, the differential response in this assay does not result from upstream activators. However, the sequences around the start sites of DHFR and REP are not similar and our data suggest that they bind different proteins. Therefore, we propose that specific initiator elements are important for determination of the requirement of some promoters for the CTD.

scholarly journals The HIP1 initiator element plays a role in determining the in vitro requirement of the dihydrofolate reductase gene promoter for the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2250-2259 ◽  
Author(s):  
A B Buermeyer ◽  
N E Thompson ◽  
L A Strasheim ◽  
R R Burgess ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Minimal Promoter ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Promoter Deletions

We examined the ability of purified RNA polymerase (RNAP) II lacking the carboxy-terminal heptapeptide repeat domain (CTD), called RNAP IIB, to transcribe a variety of promoters in HeLa extracts in which endogenous RNAP II activity was inhibited with anti-CTD monoclonal antibodies. Not all promoters were efficiently transcribed by RNAP IIB, and transcription did not correlate with the in vitro strength of the promoter or with the presence of a consensus TATA box. This was best illustrated by the GC-rich, non-TATA box promoters of the bidirectional dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR)-REP-encoding locus. Whereas the REP promoter was transcribed by RNAP IIB, the DHFR promoter remained inactive after addition of RNAP IIB to the antibody-inhibited reactions. However, both promoters were efficiently transcribed when purified RNAP with an intact CTD was added. We analyzed a series of promoter deletions to identify which cis elements determine the requirement for the CTD of RNAP II. All of the promoter deletions of both DHFR and REP retained the characteristics of their respective full-length promoters, suggesting that the information necessary to specify the requirement for the CTD is contained within approximately 65 bp near the initiation site. Furthermore, a synthetic minimal promoter of DHFR, consisting of a single binding site for Sp1 and a binding site for the HIP1 initiator cloned into a bacterial vector sequence, required RNAP II with an intact CTD for activity in vitro. Since the synthetic minimal promoter of DHFR and the smallest REP promoter deletion are both activated by Sp1, the differential response in this assay does not result from upstream activators. However, the sequences around the start sites of DHFR and REP are not similar and our data suggest that they bind different proteins. Therefore, we propose that specific initiator elements are important for determination of the requirement of some promoters for the CTD.

Transcription initiation from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is positioned by HIP1 binding at the initiation site

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 653-661
Author(s):  
A L Means ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Sequence Element ◽  
Initiator Element

We have identified a sequence element that specifies the position of transcription initiation for the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Unlike the functionally analogous TATA box that directs RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription 30 nucleotides downstream, the positioning element of the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is located directly at the site of transcription initiation. By using DNase I footprint analysis, we have shown that a protein binds to this initiator element. Transcription initiated at the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element when 28 nucleotides were inserted between it and all other upstream sequences, or when it was placed on either side of the DNA helix, suggesting that there is no strict spatial requirement between the initiator and an upstream element. Although neither a single Sp1-binding site nor a single initiator element was sufficient for transcriptional activity, the combination of one Sp1-binding site and the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element cloned into a plasmid vector resulted in transcription starting at the initiator element. We have also shown that the simian virus 40 late major initiation site has striking sequence homology to the dihydrofolate reductase initiation site and that the same, or a similar, protein binds to both sites. Examination of the sequences at other RNA polymerase II initiation sites suggests that we have identified an element that is important in the transcription of other housekeeping genes. We have thus named the protein that binds to the initiator element HIP1 (Housekeeping Initiator Protein 1).

scholarly journals Transcription initiation from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is positioned by HIP1 binding at the initiation site.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 653-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
A L Means ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Sequence Element ◽  
Initiator Element

We have identified a sequence element that specifies the position of transcription initiation for the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Unlike the functionally analogous TATA box that directs RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription 30 nucleotides downstream, the positioning element of the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is located directly at the site of transcription initiation. By using DNase I footprint analysis, we have shown that a protein binds to this initiator element. Transcription initiated at the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element when 28 nucleotides were inserted between it and all other upstream sequences, or when it was placed on either side of the DNA helix, suggesting that there is no strict spatial requirement between the initiator and an upstream element. Although neither a single Sp1-binding site nor a single initiator element was sufficient for transcriptional activity, the combination of one Sp1-binding site and the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element cloned into a plasmid vector resulted in transcription starting at the initiator element. We have also shown that the simian virus 40 late major initiation site has striking sequence homology to the dihydrofolate reductase initiation site and that the same, or a similar, protein binds to both sites. Examination of the sequences at other RNA polymerase II initiation sites suggests that we have identified an element that is important in the transcription of other housekeeping genes. We have thus named the protein that binds to the initiator element HIP1 (Housekeeping Initiator Protein 1).

scholarly journals Functional dissection of the catalytic mechanism of mammalian RNA polymerase II

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Coulombe ◽  
Marie-France Langelier
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Catalytic Mechanism ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Catalytic Mechanisms ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Affinity Peptide

High resolution X-ray crystal structures of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAP) have contributed to our understanding of transcriptional mechanisms. They also provided a powerful guide for the design of experiments aimed at further characterizing the molecular stages of the transcription reaction. Our laboratory used tandem-affinity peptide purification in native conditions to isolate human RNAP II variants that had site-specific mutations in structural elements located strategically within the enzyme's catalytic center. Both in vitro and in vivo analyses of these mutants revealed novel features of the catalytic mechanisms involving this enzyme.Key words: RNA polymerase II, transcriptional mechanisms, mutational analysis, mRNA synthesis.

scholarly journals The Human Isoform of RNA Polymerase II Subunit hRPB11bα Specifically Interacts with Transcription Factor ATF4

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey A. Proshkin ◽  
Elena K. Shematorova ◽  
George V. Shpakovski
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Fetal Brain ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Promoter Recognition ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Human Specific

Rpb11 subunit of RNA polymerase II of Eukaryotes is related to N-terminal domain of eubacterial α subunit and forms a complex with Rpb3 subunit analogous to prokaryotic α2 homodimer, which is involved in RNA polymerase assembly and promoter recognition. In humans, a POLR2J gene family has been identified that potentially encodes several hRPB11 proteins differing mainly in their short C-terminal regions. The functions of the different human specific isoforms are still mainly unknown. To further characterize the minor human specific isoform of RNA polymerase II subunit hRPB11bα, the only one from hRPB11 (POLR2J) homologues that can replace its yeast counterpart in vivo, we used it as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening of a human fetal brain cDNA library. By this analysis and subsequent co-purification assay in vitro, we identified transcription factor ATF4 as a prominent partner of the minor RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) subunit hRPB11bα. We demonstrated that the hRPB11bα interacts with leucine b-Zip domain located on the C-terminal part of ATF4. Overexpression of ATF4 activated the reporter more than 10-fold whereas co-transfection of hRPB11bα resulted in a 2.5-fold enhancement of ATF4 activation. Our data indicate that the mode of interaction of human RNAP II main (containing major for of hRPB11 subunit) and minor (containing hRPB11bα isoform of POLR2J subunit) transcription enzymes with ATF4 is certainly different in the two complexes involving hRPB3–ATF4 (not hRPB11a–ATF4) and hRpb11bα–ATF4 platforms in the first and the second case, respectively. The interaction of hRPB11bα and ATF4 appears to be necessary for the activation of RNA polymerase II containing the minor isoform of the hRPB11 subunit (POLR2J) on gene promoters regulated by this transcription factor. ATF4 activates transcription by directly contacting RNA polymerase II in the region of the heterodimer of α-like subunits (Rpb3–Rpb11) without involving a Mediator, which provides fast and highly effective activation of transcription of the desired genes. In RNA polymerase II of Homo sapiens that contains plural isoforms of the subunit hRPB11 (POLR2J), the strength of the hRPB11–ATF4 interaction appeared to be isoform-specific, providing the first functional distinction between the previously discovered human forms of the Rpb11 subunit.

scholarly journals Human Cyclin K, a Novel RNA Polymerase II-Associated Cyclin Possessing Both Carboxy-Terminal Domain Kinase and Cdk-Activating Kinase Activity

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 4291-4300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Edwards ◽  
Calvin Wong ◽  
Stephen J. Elledge
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Large Subunit ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Gene Coding ◽  
Acid Protein ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

ABSTRACT The gene coding for human cyclin K was isolated as aCPR (cell-cycle progression restoration) gene by virtue of its ability to impart a Far− phenotype to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and to rescue the lethality of a deletion of the G1 cyclin genes CLN1,CLN2, and CLN3. The cyclin K gene encodes a 357-amino-acid protein most closely related to human cyclins C and H, which have been proposed to play a role in regulating basal transcription through their association with and activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) that phosphorylate the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II). Murine and Drosophila melanogaster homologs of cyclin K have also been identified. Cyclin K mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in adult mouse and human tissues, but is most abundant in the developing germ cells of the adult testis and ovaries. Cyclin K is associated with potent CTD kinase and Cdk kinase (CAK) activity in vitro and coimmunoprecipitates with the large subunit of RNAP II. Thus, cyclin K represents a new member of the “transcription” cyclin family which may play a dual role in regulating Cdk and RNAP II activity.

scholarly journals FCP1, a Phosphatase Specific for the Heptapeptide Repeat of the Largest Subunit of RNA Polymerase II, Stimulates Transcription Elongation

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 7543-7552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhrangsu S. Mandal ◽  
Helen Cho ◽  
Sungjoon Kim ◽  
Kettly Cabane ◽  
Danny Reinberg
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Carboxy Terminal Domain ◽  
Transcription Factor Iif ◽  
Transcript Elongation ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

ABSTRACT FCP1, a phosphatase specific for the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), was found to stimulate transcript elongation by RNAP II in vitro and in vivo. This activity is independent of and distinct from the elongation-stimulatory activity associated with transcription factor IIF (TFIIF), and the elongation effects of TFIIF and FCP1 were found to be additive. Genetic experiments resulted in the isolation of several distinct fcp1 alleles. One of these alleles was found to suppress the slow-growth phenotype associated with either the reduction of intracellular nucleotide concentrations or the inhibition of other transcription elongation factors. Importantly, this allele of fcp1 was found to be lethal when combined individually with two mutations in the second-largest subunit of RNAP II, which had been shown previously to affect transcription elongation.

Core promoter-selective RNA polymerase II transcription

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 225-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Gross ◽  
Thomas Oelgeschläger
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Promoter Sequence ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Promoter Sequence ◽  
Rnap Ii

The initiation of mRNA synthesis in eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process that requires the assembly of general transcription factors and RNAP II (RNA polymerase II; also abbreviated as Pol II) into a pre-initiation complex at the core promoter. The core promoter is defined as the minimal DNA region that is sufficient to direct low levels of activator-independent (basal) transcription by RNAP II in vitro. The core promoter typically extends approx. 40 bp up- and down-stream of the start site of transcription and can contain several distinct core promoter sequence elements. Core promoters in higher eukaryotes are highly diverse in structure, and each core promoter sequence element is only found in a subset of genes. So far, only TATA box and INR (initiator) element have been shown to be capable of directing accurate RNAP II transcription initiation independent of other core promoter elements. Computational analysis of metazoan genomes suggests that the prevalence of the TATA box has been overestimated in the past and that the majority of human genes are TATA-less. While TATA-mediated transcription initiation has been studied in great detail and is very well understood, very little is known about the factors and mechanisms involved in the function of the INR and other core promoter elements. Here we summarize our current understanding of the factors and mechanisms involved in core promoter-selective transcription and discuss possible pathways through which diversity in core promoter architecture might contribute to combinatorial gene regulation in metazoan cells.

scholarly journals RNAP II CTD tyrosine 1 performs diverse functions in vertebrate cells

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Ping Hsin ◽  
Wencheng Li ◽  
Mainul Hoque ◽  
Bin Tian ◽  
James L Manley
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Report Analysis ◽  
Rnap Ii ◽  
Y Cells ◽  
Dt40 Cells

The RNA polymerase II largest subunit (Rpb1) contains a unique C-terminal domain (CTD) that plays multiple roles during transcription. The CTD is composed of consensus Y1S2P3T4S5P6S7 repeats, in which Ser, Thr and Tyr residues can all be phosphorylated. Here we report analysis of CTD Tyr1 using genetically tractable chicken DT40 cells. Cells expressing an Rpb1 derivative with all Tyr residues mutated to Phe (Rpb1-Y1F) were inviable. Remarkably, Rpb1-Y1F was unstable, degraded to a CTD-less form; however stability, but not cell viability, was fully rescued by restoration of a single C-terminal Tyr (Rpb1-25F+Y). Cytoplasmic and nucleoplasmic Rpb1 was phosphorylated exclusively on Tyr1, and phosphorylation specifically of Tyr1 prevented CTD degradation by the proteasome in vitro. Tyr1 phosphorylation was also detected on chromatin-associated, hyperphosphorylated Rpb1, consistent with a role in transcription. Indeed, we detected accumulation of upstream antisense (ua) RNAs in Rpb1-25F+Y cells, indicating a role for Tyr1 in uaRNA expression.

scholarly journals Subnuclear Localization of Ku Protein: Functional Association with RNA Polymerase II Elongation Sites

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (22) ◽  
pp. 8088-8099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianming Mo ◽  
William S. Dynan
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Rnap Ii

ABSTRACT Ku is an abundant nuclear protein with an essential function in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Various observations suggest that Ku also interacts with the cellular transcription machinery, although the mechanism and significance of this interaction are not well understood. In the present study, we investigated the subnuclear distribution of Ku in normally growing human cells by using confocal microscopy, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and protein immunoprecipitation. All three approaches indicated association of Ku with RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) elongation sites. This association occurred independently of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit and was highly selective. There was no detectable association with the initiating isoform of RNAP II or with the general transcription initiation factors. In vitro protein-protein interaction assays demonstrated that the association of Ku with elongation proteins is mediated, in part, by a discrete C-terminal domain in the Ku80 subunit. Functional disruption of this interaction with a dominant-negative mutant inhibited transcription in vitro and in vivo and suppressed cell growth. These results suggest that association of Ku with transcription sites is important for maintenance of global transcription levels. Tethering of double-strand break repair proteins to defined subnuclear structures may also be advantageous in maintenance of genome stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document