Type I and II PRMTs inversely regulate post-transcriptional intron detention through Sm and CHTOP methylation

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) are required for the regulation of RNA processing factors. Type I PRMT enzymes catalyze mono- and asymmetric dimethylation; Type II enzymes catalyze mono- and symmetric dimethylation. To understand the specific mechanisms of PRMT activity in splicing regulation, we inhibited Type I and II PRMTs and probed their transcriptomic consequences. Using the newly developed Splicing Kinetics and Transcript Elongation Rates by Sequencing (SKaTER-seq) method, analysis of co-transcriptional splicing demonstrated that PRMT inhibition resulted in altered splicing rates. Surprisingly, co-transcriptional splicing kinetics did not correlate with final changes in splicing of polyadenylated RNA. This was particularly true for retained introns (RI). By using actinomycin D to inhibit ongoing transcription, we determined that PRMTs post-transcriptionally regulate RI. Subsequent proteomic analysis of both PRMT-inhibited chromatin and chromatin-associated polyadenylated RNA identified altered binding of many proteins, including the Type I substrate, CHTOP, and the Type II substrate, SmB. Targeted mutagenesis of all methylarginine sites in SmD3, SmB, and SmD1 recapitulated splicing changes seen with Type II PRMT inhibition, without disrupting snRNP assembly. Similarly, mutagenesis of all methylarginine sites in CHTOP recapitulated the splicing changes seen with Type I PRMT inhibition. Examination of subcellular fractions further revealed that RI were enriched in the nucleoplasm and chromatin. Together, these data demonstrate that, through Sm and CHTOP arginine methylation, PRMTs regulate the post-transcriptional processing of nuclear, detained introns.

Obligate movements of an active site–linked surface domain control RNA polymerase elongation and pausing via a Phe pocket anchor

The catalytic trigger loop (TL) in RNA polymerase (RNAP) alternates between unstructured and helical hairpin conformations to admit and then contact the NTP substrate during transcription. In many bacterial lineages, the TL is interrupted by insertions of two to five surface-exposed, sandwich-barrel hybrid motifs (SBHMs) of poorly understood function. The 188-amino acid, two-SBHM insertion in Escherichia coli RNAP, called SI3, occupies different locations in elongating, NTP-bound, and paused transcription complexes, but its dynamics during active transcription and pausing are undefined. Here, we report the design, optimization, and use of a Cys-triplet reporter to measure the positional bias of SI3 in different transcription complexes and to determine the effect of restricting SI3 movement on nucleotide addition and pausing. We describe the use of H2O2 as a superior oxidant for RNAP disulfide reporters. NTP binding biases SI3 toward the closed conformation, whereas transcriptional pausing biases SI3 toward a swiveled position that inhibits TL folding. We find that SI3 must change location in every round of nucleotide addition and that restricting its movements inhibits both transcript elongation and pausing. These dynamics are modulated by a crucial Phe pocket formed by the junction of the two SBHM domains. This SI3 Phe pocket captures a Phe residue in the RNAP jaw when the TL unfolds, explaining the similar phenotypes of alterations in the jaw and SI3. Our findings establish that SI3 functions by modulating TL folding to aid transcriptional regulation and to reset secondary channel trafficking in every round of nucleotide addition.

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli utilizes an AND-OR logic gate to regulate expression of an outer membrane haem receptor

To sense the transition from environment to host, bacteria use a range of environmental cues to control expression of virulence genes. Iron is tightly sequestered in host tissues and in the human pathogen enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) iron-limitation induces transcription of the outermembrane haem transporter encoded by chuAS. ChuA expression is post-transcriptionally activated at 37oC by a FourU RNA thermometer ensuring that the haem receptor is only expressed under low iron, high temperature conditions that indicate the host. Here we demonstrate that expression of chuA is also independently regulated by the cAMP-responsive sRNA CyaR and transcriptional terminator Rho. These results indicate that chuA expression is regulated at the transcription initiation, transcript elongation, and translational level. The natural dependence of these processes creates a hierarchy of regulatory AND and OR logic gates that integrate information about the local environment. We show that the logic of the chuA regulatory circuit is activated under conditions that satisfy low iron AND (low glucose OR high temperature). We speculate that additional sensing of a gluconeogenic environment allows further precision in determining when EHEC is at the gastrointestinal epithelium of the host. With previous studies, it appears that the chuA transcript is controlled by eight regulatory inputs that control expression through six different transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. The results highlight the ability of regulatory sRNAs to integrate multiple environmental signals into a conditional hierarchy of signal input.

Transcriptional Pausing as a Mediator of Bacterial Gene Regulation

Cellular life depends on transcription of DNA by RNA polymerase to express genetic information. RNA polymerase has evolved not just to read information from DNA and write it to RNA but also to sense and process information from the cellular and extracellular environments. Much of this information processing occurs during transcript elongation, when transcriptional pausing enables regulatory decisions. Transcriptional pauses halt RNA polymerase in response to DNA and RNA sequences and structures at locations and times that help coordinate interactions with small molecules and transcription factors important for regulation. Four classes of transcriptional pause signals are now evident after decades of study: elemental pauses, backtrack pauses, hairpin-stabilized pauses, and regulator-stabilized pauses. In this review, I describe current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these four classes of pause signals, remaining questions about how RNA polymerase responds to pause signals, and the many exciting directions now open to understand pausing and the regulation of transcript elongation on a genome-wide scale. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Abstract P-18: Phosphorylation of RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Affects Transcript Elongation Through Chromatin

Background: Transcription is the central point of gene regulation where the efficient maintenance of chromatin structure during the passage of RNA polymerase (Pol II) is critical for cell survival and functioning. The phosphorylation of carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of the large subunit (Rpb1) of Pol II plays a key role in transcription through chromatin providing the binding and dissociation of factors essential for the mRNA biogenesis. Although the regulatory effect of chromatin structure on multiple stages of transcription has been well established, the role of CTD phosphorylation itself has not been systematically addressed. Methods: The effect of differentially phosphorylated Pol II-CTD on transcript elongation through chromatin was studied using in vitro transcription system based on mononucleosomes precisely positioned on DNA. The unphosphorylated and hyperphosphorylated Pol II-CTD were obtained using yeast genetics as well as in vitro kinase or phosphatases. Transcription rate and positions of pausing were measured using authentic elongation complexes comprising Pol II having different CTD phosphorylation states. The quantitative analysis of the transcripts was conducted using denaturing PAGE. Results: We observed a significant difference in the transcription through chromatin depending on CTD phosphorylation level. Thus, experiments on transcription of nucleosomes with Pol II isoforms have shown that the hyperphosphorylated form more efficiently transcribes the nucleosome and leads to a faster accumulation of the full-length RNA product than the non-phosphorylated isoform of Pol II. The non-phosphorylated isoform of the enzyme is characterized by a stronger pause in the early nucleosomal region and a slower accumulation of the full-length RNA product. Conclusion: Hyperphosphorylated form more efficiently transcribes the nucleosome and leads to a faster accumulation of the full-length RNA product as compared with the non-phosphorylated isoform of Pol II. A preliminary model of the effect of Pol II hyperphosphorylation on nucleosomal DNA transcription is proposed.

Abstract P-23: Histone N-terminal Tails Reduce Early Nucleosomal Pausing during Transcription

Background: Nucleosomes are the barriers to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase 2 (Pol 2) in vitro and in vivo. Formation and overcoming the barrier are important for transcription regulation. N-terminal tails of core histones do not affect the inner structure of nucleosomal core. However, strongly positively charged tails can interact with the DNA, thereby impeding polymerase progression through the template. Removal of histone tails was shown to facilitate transcription through a nucleosome by both yeast and human Pol 2, and the effect was most noticeable at lower ionic strength (40 mM KCl). In vivo experiments established a new mechanism of overcoming of +1 nucleosomal barrier by removal of histone tails by specific regulative proteinase. As +1 nucleosomal barrier is formed mostly by the promoter-proximal part of the nucleosomal DNA, here we address the effects of histone tails on elongation through this part of the nucleosome. Methods: We have studied the effect of histone tails on transcription by yeast Pol 2 and model enzyme E. coli RNA polymerase utilizing very similar mechanisms of elongation through chromatin. 603 nucleosomes were transcribed in vitro using purified proteins and components. To focus on the proximal part of the nucleosome, transcript elongation was conducted for a limited time and at low ionic strength. Results: For the phosphorylated form of yeast Pol 2 and E. coli RNAP, histone tail removal significantly reduces the strong nucleosome-specific pausing that the yeast polymerase encounters ∼15 bp within the 603 nucleosome and further downstream, leading to both increased traversal of the pause and the accumulation of complexes paused at more distal locations. However, tail removal did not lead to a significant increase in full traversal of either nucleosomal template. The effect of histone tails removal was cognate for both enzymes but differs in detailed effect on the barrier. Conclusion: Histone tails provide a significant part of the nucleosomal barrier to transcript elongation by Pol 2-type mechanism. The effect is very pronounced in the promoter-proximal part of the nucleosomal DNA, suggesting that histone tails could play a role during the regulation of the +1 nucleosomal barrier. The role of Pol 2 CTD phosphorylation and formation of the intranucleosomal loops in the regulation of +1 nucleosomal barrier will also be addressed.

Histone sumoylation and chromatin dynamics

Chromatin structure and gene expression are dynamically controlled by post-translational modifications (PTMs) on histone proteins, including ubiquitylation, methylation, acetylation and small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) conjugation. It was initially thought that histone sumoylation exclusively suppressed gene transcription, but recent advances in proteomics and genomics have uncovered its diverse functions in cotranscriptional processes, including chromatin remodeling, transcript elongation, and blocking cryptic initiation. Histone sumoylation is integral to complex signaling codes that prime additional histone PTMs as well as modifications of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain (RNAPII-CTD) during transcription. In addition, sumoylation of histone variants is critical for the DNA double-strand break (DSB) response and for chromosome segregation during mitosis. This review describes recent findings on histone sumoylation and its coordination with other histone and RNAPII-CTD modifications in the regulation of chromatin dynamics.

Spatial organization of transcript elongation and splicing kinetics

SummaryThe organization of the genome in three-dimensional space has been shown to play an important role in gene expression. Specifically, facets of genomic interaction such as topologically associated domains (TADs) have been shown to regulate transcription by bringing regulatory elements into close proximity1. mRNA production is an intricate process with multiple control points including regulation of Pol II elongation and the removal of non-coding sequences via pre-mRNA splicing2. The connection between genomic compartments and the kinetics of RNA biogenesis and processing has been largely unexplored. Here, we measure Pol II elongation and splicing kinetics genome-wide using a novel technique that couples nascent RNA-seq with a mathematical model of transcription and co-transcriptional RNA processing. We uncovered multiple layers of spatial organization of these rates: the rate of splicing is coordinated across introns within individual genes, and both elongation and splicing rates are coordinated within TADs, as are alternative splicing outcomes. Overall, our work establishes that the kinetics of transcription and splicing are coordinated by the spatial organization of the genome and suggests that TADs are a major platform for coordination of alternative splicing.

Obligate movements of an active site-linked surface domain control RNA polymerase elongation and pausing via a Phe-pocket anchor

ABSTRACTThe catalytic trigger loop (TL) in RNA polymerase (RNAP) alternates between unstructured and helical hairpin conformations to admit and then contact the NTP substrate during transcription. In many bacterial lineages, the TL is interrupted by insertions of 2–5 surface-exposed, sandwich-barrel hybrid motifs (SBHMs) of poorly understood function. The 188-aa, 2-SBHM E. coli insertion, called SI3, occupies different locations in halted, NTP-bound, and paused transcription complexes, but its dynamics during active transcription and pausing are undefined. Here we report design, optimization, and use of a Cys-triplet reporter to measure the positional bias of SI3 in different transcription complexes and to determine the effect of restricting SI3 movement on nucleotide addition and pausing. We describe use of H2O2 as a superior oxidant for RNAP disulfide reporters. NTP binding biases SI3 toward the closed conformation whereas transcriptional pausing biases SI3 toward a swiveled position that inhibits TL folding. We find that SI3 must change location in every round of nucleotide addition and that restricting its movements inhibits both transcript elongation and pausing. These dynamics are modulated by a crucial Phe pocket formed by the junction of the two SBHM domains. This SI3 Phe pocket captures a Phe residue in the RNAP jaw when the TL unfolds, explaining the similar phenotypes of alterations in the jaw and SI3. Our findings establish that SI3 functions by modulating the TL folding to aid transcriptional regulation and to reset secondary channel trafficking in every round of nucleotide addition.SIGNIFICANCERNA synthesis by cellular RNA polymerases depends on an active-site component called the trigger loop that oscillates between an unstructured loop that admits NTP substrates and a helical hairpin that positions the NTP in every round of nucleotide addition. In most bacteria, the trigger loop contains a large, surface-exposed insertion module that occupies different positions in halted transcription complexes but whose function during active transcription is unknown. By developing and using a novel disulfide reporter system, we find the insertion module also must alternate between in and out positions for every nucleotide addition, must swivel to a paused position to support regulation, and, in enterobacteria, evolved a “Phe pocket” that captures a key phenylalanine in the out and swivel positions.