scholarly journals The Two RNA Ligases of the Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing Complex: Cloning the Essential Band IV Gene and Identifying the Band V Gene

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura N. Rusché ◽  
Catherine E. Huang ◽  
Kenneth J. Piller ◽  
Michael Hemann ◽  
Elizabeth Wirtz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Mitochondrial Targeting ◽  
Terminal Sequence ◽  
Partial Amino Acid Sequence ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Mitochondrial Transcripts

ABSTRACT Kinetoplastid RNA editing is a posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of U residues in mitochondrial transcripts that involves RNA ligase. A complex of seven different polypeptides purified fromTrypanosoma brucei mitochondria that catalyzes accurate RNA editing contains RNA ligases of ∼57 kDa (band IV) and ∼50 kDa (band V). From a partial amino acid sequence, cDNA and genomic clones of band IV were isolated, making it the first cloned component of the minimal RNA editing complex. It is indeed an RNA ligase, for when expressed inEscherichia coli, the protein autoadenylylates and catalyzes RNA joining. Overexpression studies revealed that T. brucei can regulate of total band IV protein at the level of translation or protein stability, even upon massively increased mRNA levels. The protein's mitochondrial targeting was confirmed by its location, size when expressed in T. brucei and E. coli, and N-terminal sequence. Importantly, genetic knockout studies demonstrated that the gene for band IV is essential in procyclic trypanosomes. The band IV and band V RNA ligases of the RNA editing complex therefore serve different functions. We also identified the gene for band V RNA ligase, a protein much more homologous to band IV than to other known ligases.

scholarly journals Editing domains of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial RNAs identified by secondary structure.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2916-2924 ◽  
Author(s):  
K J Piller ◽  
C J Decker ◽  
L N Rusché ◽  
M E Harris ◽  
S L Hajduk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Mung Bean Nuclease ◽  
Reaction Conditions ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Mitochondrial Transcripts ◽  
Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit Ii ◽  
Model Reactions

The posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of U residues in trypanosome mitochondrial transcripts called RNA editing initiates at the 3' end of precisely defined editing domains that can be identified independently of the cognate guide RNA. The regions where editing initiates in Trypanosoma brucei cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit II preedited mRNAs are specifically cleaved by a trypanosome mitochondrial endonuclease that acts like mung bean nuclease and therefore is single strand specific. The regions where editing initiates in virtually all examined preedited mRNAs are predicted to form loop structures, suggesting that editing domains could generally be recognized as prominent single-stranded loops. In contrast to preedited mRNA, edited mRNA can be either resistant or sensitive to cleavage by trypanosome mitochondrial endonuclease, depending on the reaction conditions. This selectivity appears dependent on the availability of extract RNAs, and in model reactions, edited mRNA becomes resistant to cleavage upon base pairing with its guide RNA. Natural partially edited mRNAs are also specifically cleaved with a sensitivity like preedited and unlike edited mRNAs, consistent with their being intermediates in editing. These results suggest that in vivo, the structure of editing domains could initially be recognized by the mitochondrial endonuclease, which could target its associated RNA ligase and terminal U transferase to begin cycles of enzymatic editing modifications.

scholarly journals Guide RNA-mRNA chimeras, which are potential RNA editing intermediates, are formed by endonuclease and RNA ligase in a trypanosome mitochondrial extract.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2933-2941 ◽  
Author(s):  
L N Rusché ◽  
K J Piller ◽  
B Sollner-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Rna Editing ◽  
Mitochondrial Rna ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Editing Domain ◽  
Mitochondrial Transcripts ◽  
Mitochondrial Extract

RNA editing in kinetoplast mitochondrial transcripts involves the insertion and/or deletion of uridine residues and is directed by guide RNAs (gRNAs). It is thought to occur through a chimeric intermediate in which the 3' oligo(U) tail of the gRNA is covalently joined to the 3' portion of the mRNA at the site being edited. Chimeras have been proposed to be formed by a transesterification reaction but could also be formed by the known mitochondrial site-specific nuclease and RNA ligase. To distinguish between these models, we studied chimera formation in vitro directed by a trypanosome mitochondrial extract. This reaction was found to occur in two steps. First, the mRNA is cleaved in the 3' portion of the editing domain, and then the 3' fragment derived from this cleavage is ligated to the gRNA. The isolated mRNA 3' cleavage product is a more efficient substrate for chimera formation than is the intact mRNA, inconsistent with a transesterification mechanism but supporting a nuclease-ligase mechanism. Also, when normal mRNA cleavage is inhibited by the presence of a phosphorothioate, normal chimera formation no longer occurs. Rather, this phosphorothioate induces both cleavage and chimera formation at a novel site within the editing domain. Finally, levels of chimera-forming activity correlate with levels of mitochondrial RNA ligase activity when reactions are conducted under conditions which inhibit the ligase, including the lack of ATP containing a cleavable alpha-beta bond. These data show that chimera formation in the mitochondrial extract occurs by a nuclease-ligase mechanism rather than by transesterification.

Modification of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial rRNA by posttranscriptional 3' polyuridine tail formation

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5878-5884
Author(s):  
B K Adler ◽  
M E Harris ◽  
K I Bertrand ◽  
S L Hajduk
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Total Cell ◽  
Metabolic Labeling ◽  
Mechanism Of Formation ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Mitochondrial Rrna ◽  
Mitochondrial Transcripts ◽  
Reading Frames

Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial transcripts can be posttranscriptionally processed by uridine addition or deletion. With editing of mRNAs, uridine addition and deletion create precisely altered reading frames. The addition of nonencoded uridines to mitochondrial guide RNAs results in a less precise modification. Although uridines are specifically added to the 3' termini, their number varies, which results in heterogeneous oligo(U) tails on guide RNAs. In this paper, we show that the mitochondrial 9S and 12S rRNAs are also modified by uridine addition. These modifications appear to have aspects in common with both RNA editing and oligo(U) tail formation. Metabolic labeling studies with intact mitochondria and [alpha-32P]UTP, in the absence of transcription, demonstrated the posttranscriptional timing of the event. T1 RNase comparison analyses of cytidine 3',5'-[5'-32P]biphosphate 3'-end-labeled and [alpha-32P]UTP metabolically labeled rRNAs, along with direct RNA sequencing of the 3' termini, identified the site of uridine addition and revealed the creation of an oligo(U) tail for both rRNAs. 12S and 9S rRNAs hybrid selected from total cell RNA exhibited the same modification, demonstrating the presence of this processing in vivo. Moreover, only 3'-poly(U)-tailed 9S and 12S rRNAs were detected in total cellular and mitochondrial RNAs, which suggests that they are the most abundant and probable mature forms. The 12S and 9S rRNA oligo(U) tails differed significantly from each other, with the 12S having a heterogeneous tail of 2 to 17 uridines and the 9S having a tail of precisely 11 uridines. The mechanism of formation and the function of the rRNA poly(U) tails remain to be determined.

scholarly journals Complexes from Trypanosoma brucei that exhibit deletion editing and other editing-associated properties.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1410-1418 ◽  
Author(s):  
R A Corell ◽  
L K Read ◽  
G R Riley ◽  
J K Nellissery ◽  
T E Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Uv Treatment ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Ribonucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Multicomponent Complex ◽  
Editing Activity ◽  
Atpase 6

Transcripts from many mitochondrial genes in kinetoplastids undergo RNA editing, a posttranscriptional process which inserts and deletes uridines. By assaying for deletion editing in vitro, we found that the editing activity from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial lysates (S.D. Seiwert and K.D. Stuart), Science 266:114-117,1994) sediments with a peak of approximately 20S. RNA helicase, terminal uridylyl transferase, RNA ligase, and adenylation activities, which may have a role in editing, cosediment in a broad distribution, with most of each activity at 35 to 40S. Most ATPase 6 (A6) guide RNA and unedited A6 mRNA sediments at 20 to 30S, with some sedimenting further into the gradient, while most edited A6 mRNA sediments at >35S. Several mitochondrial proteins which cross-link specifically with guide RNA upon UV treatment also sediment in glycerol gradients. Notably, a 65-kDa protein sediments primarily at approximately 20S, a 90-kDa protein sediments at 35 to 40S, and a 25-kDa protein is present at <10S. Most ribonucleoprotein complexes that form with gRNA in vitro sediment at 10 to 20S, except for one, which sediments at 30 to 45S. These results suggest that RNA editing takes place within a multicomponent complex. The potential functions of and relationships between the 20S and 35 to 40S complexes are discussed.

scholarly journals TbMP44 Is Essential for RNA Editing and Structural Integrity of the Editosome in Trypanosoma brucei

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Wang ◽  
Nancy Lewis Ernst ◽  
Setareh S. Palazzo ◽  
Aswini K. Panigrahi ◽  
Reza Salavati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Sequence Database ◽  
Multiprotein Complex ◽  
Database Analysis ◽  
Insertion And Deletion

ABSTRACT RNA editing produces mature mitochondrial mRNAs in trypanosomatids by the insertion and deletion of uridylates. It is catalyzed by a multiprotein complex, the editosome. We identified TbMP44 among the components of enriched editosomes by a combination of mass spectrometry and DNA sequence database analysis. Inactivation of an ectopic TbMP44 allele in cells in which the endogenous alleles were disrupted abolished RNA editing, inhibited cell growth, and was eventually lethal to bloodstream form trypanosomes. Loss of TbMP44 mRNA was followed initially by a reduction in the editosome sedimentation coefficient and then by the absence of other editosome proteins despite the presence of the mRNA. Reactivation of TbMP44 gene expression resulted in the resumption of cell growth and the reappearance of editosomes. These data indicate that TbMP44 is a component of the editosome that is essential for editing and critical for the structural integrity of the editosome.

scholarly journals Uridylate Addition and RNA Ligation Contribute to the Specificity of Kinetoplastid Insertion RNA Editing

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 8447-8457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Igo ◽  
Setareh S. Palazzo ◽  
Moffett L. K. Burgess ◽  
Aswini K. Panigrahi ◽  
Kenneth Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Rna Ligase ◽  
Correct Number ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Rna Ligation

ABSTRACT RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in mitochondrial pre-mRNAs under the direction of guide RNAs (gRNAs). We report here the development of a novel in vitro precleaved editing assay and its use to study the gRNA specificity of the U addition and RNA ligation steps in insertion RNA editing. The 5′ fragment of substrate RNA accumulated with the number of added U's specified by gRNA, and U addition products with more than the specified number of U's were rare. U addition up to the number specified occurred in the absence of ligation, but accumulation of U addition products was slowed. The 5′ fragments with the correct number of added U's were preferentially ligated, apparently by adenylylated RNA ligase since exogenously added ATP was not required and since ligation was eliminated by treatment with pyrophosphate. gRNA-specified U addition was apparent in the absence of ligation when the pre-mRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was single stranded and more so when it was base paired with gRNA. These results suggest that both the U addition and RNA ligation steps contributed to the precision of RNA editing.

scholarly journals RNA Editing in Trypanosoma brucei Requires Three Different Editosomes

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Carnes ◽  
James Raffaello Trotter ◽  
Adam Peltan ◽  
Michele Fleck ◽  
Kenneth Stuart
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Editing Site ◽  
Unexpected Finding ◽  
Rnase Iii ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Additional Level

ABSTRACT Trypanosoma brucei has three distinct ∼20S editosomes that catalyze RNA editing by the insertion and deletion of uridylates. Editosomes with the KREN1 or KREN2 RNase III type endonucleases specifically cleave deletion and insertion editing site substrates, respectively. We report here that editosomes with KREPB2, which also has an RNase III motif, specifically cleave cytochrome oxidase II (COII) pre-mRNA insertion editing site substrates in vitro. Conditional repression and mutation studies also show that KREPB2 is an editing endonuclease specifically required for COII mRNA editing in vivo. Furthermore, KREPB2 expression is essential for the growth and survival of bloodstream forms. Thus, editing in T. brucei requires at least three compositionally and functionally distinct ∼20S editosomes, two of which distinguish between different insertion editing sites. This unexpected finding reveals an additional level of complexity in the RNA editing process and suggests a mechanism for how the selection of sites for editing in vivo is controlled.

scholarly journals In Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing, Band II Enables Recognition Specifically at Each Step of the U Insertion Cycle

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 2785-2794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Law ◽  
Catherine E. Huang ◽  
Sean F. O'Hearn ◽  
Barbara Sollner-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Protein Recognition ◽  
Essential Nature ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
Insertion Sites

ABSTRACT Trypanosome RNA editing is the posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of uridylate (U) residues, often to a massive extent, through cycles of cleavage, U addition or U removal, and ligation. These editing cycles are catalyzed by a complex that we purified to seven major proteins (bands I through VII). Here we analyze the role of band II using extracts of clonal band II RNA interference (RNAi) cell lines prepared by a rapid protocol that enables retention of activities that are lost during traditional extract preparation. By individually scoring each step of editing, we show that band II is critical for all steps of U insertion but is not important for any of the steps of U deletion or for their coordination into the U deletion cycle. This specificity supports the long- standing model that U-insertional and U-deletional activities are separated within the editing complex. Furthermore, by assaying the basic activities of the enzymes that catalyze the steps of U insertion, independent of their action in editing, we show that band II is not any of those enzymes. Rather, band II enables endonuclease action at authentic U insertion sites, terminal-uridylyl-transferase (TUTase) action at cleaved U insertion sites, and U-insertion-specific ligase (band V/IREL) action in the editing complex. Thus, band II facilitates each step of U insertion by providing proper RNA and/or protein recognition. We propose that band II (TbMP81) be called IRER, indicating its essential nature in U-insertional RNA editing recognition.

scholarly journals Dyskinetoplastic Trypanosoma brucei Contains Functional Editing Complexes

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo J. Domingo ◽  
Setareh S. Palazzo ◽  
Bingbing Wang ◽  
Brian Pannicucci ◽  
Reza Salavati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Rna Editing ◽  
Trypanosoma Evansi ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Single Class ◽  
Catalytic Activities ◽  
Guide Rnas ◽  
Insertion And Deletion ◽  
And Function

ABSTRACT Mitochondrial pre-mRNAs undergo posttranscriptional RNA editing as directed by small guide RNAs (gRNAs) to produce functional mRNAs in kinetoplastid protozoa. The pre-mRNAs and gRNAs are encoded in the maxicircle and minicircle components, respectively, of the kinetoplastid mitochondrial DNA (kDNA), and editing is catalyzed by a multienzyme protein complex. Trypanosoma evansi AnTat3/3, which lacks maxicircles but retains a single class of minicircles, and a dyskinetoplastic mutant of Trypanosoma brucei EATRO164, which is devoid of kDNA, were both shown to retain genes and proteins for the editing complex. The proteins are present in complexes that immunoprecipitate and sediment indistinguishably from wild-type complexes. The complexes catalyze precleaved insertion and deletion editing as well as full-round deletion editing in vitro. Thus, mutants which lack the natural substrates for RNA editing and all or most gRNAs retain editing complexes that contain the four primary catalytic activities of editing and function in editing, at least in vitro. Therefore neither pre-mRNA nor gRNA is required to form functional RNA-editing complexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document