scholarly journals Regulation of E2F1 by BRCT Domain-Containing Protein TopBP1

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 3287-3304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Liu ◽  
Fang-Tsyr Lin ◽  
J. Michael Ruppert ◽  
Weei-Chin Lin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Brct Domain ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Dna Topoisomerase ◽  
E2f Transcription Factor ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACT The E2F transcription factor integrates cellular signals and coordinates cell cycle progression. Our prior studies demonstrated selective induction and stabilization of E2F1 through ATM-dependent phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. Here we report that DNA topoisomerase IIβ binding protein 1 (TopBP1) regulates E2F1 during DNA damage. TopBP1 contains eight BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) motifs and upon DNA damage is recruited to stalled replication forks, where it participates in a DNA damage checkpoint. Here we demonstrated an interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1. The interaction depended on the amino terminus of E2F1 and the sixth BRCT domain of TopBP1. It was specific to E2F1 and was not observed in E2F2, E2F3, or E2F4. This interaction was induced by DNA damage and phosphorylation of E2F1 by ATM. Through this interaction, TopBP1 repressed multiple activities of E2F1, including transcriptional activity, induction of S-phase entry, and apoptosis. Furthermore, TopBP1 relocalized E2F1 from diffuse nuclear distribution to discrete punctate nuclear foci, where E2F1 colocalized with TopBP1 and BRCA1. Thus, the specific interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1 during DNA damage inhibits the known E2F1 activities but recruits E2F1 to a BRCA1-containing repair complex, suggesting a direct role of E2F1 in DNA damage checkpoint/repair at stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Regulation of Rtt107 Recruitment to Stalled DNA Replication Forks by the Cullin Rtt101 and the Rtt109 Acetyltransferase

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania M. Roberts ◽  
Iram Waris Zaidi ◽  
Jessica A. Vaisica ◽  
Matthias Peter ◽  
Grant W. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

RTT107 (ESC4, YHR154W) encodes a BRCA1 C-terminal domain protein that is important for recovery from DNA damage during S phase. Rtt107 is a substrate of the checkpoint kinase Mec1, and it forms complexes with DNA repair enzymes, including the nuclease subunit Slx4, but the role of Rtt107 in the DNA damage response remains unclear. We find that Rtt107 interacts with chromatin when cells are treated with compounds that cause replication forks to arrest. This damage-dependent chromatin binding requires the acetyltransferase Rtt109, but it does not require acetylation of the known Rtt109 target, histone H3-K56. Chromatin binding of Rtt107 also requires the cullin Rtt101, which seems to play a direct role in Rtt107 recruitment, because the two proteins are found in complex with each other. Finally, we provide evidence that Rtt107 is bound at or near stalled replication forks in vivo. Together, these results indicate that Rtt109, Rtt101, and Rtt107, which genetic evidence suggests are functionally related, form a DNA damage response pathway that recruits Rtt107 complexes to damaged or stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Checkpoint regulation of replication forks: global or local?

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Late Origin ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Cell-cycle checkpoints are generally global in nature: one unattached kinetochore prevents the segregation of all chromosomes; stalled replication forks inhibit late origin firing throughout the genome. A potential exception to this rule is the regulation of replication fork progression by the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. In this case, it is possible that the checkpoint is global, and it slows all replication forks in the genome. However, it is also possible that the checkpoint acts locally at sites of DNA damage, and only slows those forks that encounter DNA damage. Whether the checkpoint regulates forks globally or locally has important mechanistic implications for how replication forks deal with damaged DNA during S-phase.

scholarly journals Rad4TopBP1, a Scaffold Protein, Plays Separate Roles in DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints and DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 3456-3468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Taricani ◽  
Teresa S.F. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Novel Mutation ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Brct Domain ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Sensor Proteins

Rad4TopBP1, a BRCT domain protein, is required for both DNA replication and checkpoint responses. Little is known about how the multiple roles of Rad4TopBP1 are coordinated in maintaining genome integrity. We show here that Rad4TopBP1 of fission yeast physically interacts with the checkpoint sensor proteins, the replicative DNA polymerases, and a WD-repeat protein, Crb3. We identified four novel mutants to investigate how Rad4TopBP1 could have multiple roles in maintaining genomic integrity. A novel mutation in the third BRCT domain of rad4+TopBP1 abolishes DNA damage checkpoint response, but not DNA replication, replication checkpoint, and cell cycle progression. This mutant protein is able to associate with all three replicative polymerases and checkpoint proteins Rad3ATR-Rad26ATRIP, Hus1, Rad9, and Rad17 but has a compromised association with Crb3. Furthermore, the damaged-induced Rad9 phosphorylation is significantly reduced in this rad4TopBP1 mutant. Genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that Crb3 has a role in the maintenance of DNA damage checkpoint and influences the Rad4TopBP1 damage checkpoint function. Taken together, our data suggest that Rad4TopBP1 provides a scaffold to a large complex containing checkpoint and replication proteins thereby separately enforcing checkpoint responses to DNA damage and replication perturbations during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Interactions and Localization of Escherichia coli Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV after DNA Damage

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (17) ◽  
pp. 2792-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mallik ◽  
Ellen M. Popodi ◽  
Andrew J. Hanson ◽  
Patricia L. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACTEscherichia coli's DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB), a member of the Y family of error-prone polymerases, is induced during the SOS response to DNA damage and is responsible for translesion bypass and adaptive (stress-induced) mutation. In this study, the localization of Pol IV after DNA damage was followed using fluorescent fusions. After exposure ofE. colito DNA-damaging agents, fluorescently tagged Pol IV localized to the nucleoid as foci. Stepwise photobleaching indicated ∼60% of the foci consisted of three Pol IV molecules, while ∼40% consisted of six Pol IV molecules. Fluorescently tagged Rep, a replication accessory DNA helicase, was recruited to the Pol IV foci after DNA damage, suggesting that thein vitrointeraction between Rep and Pol IV reported previously also occursin vivo. Fluorescently tagged RecA also formed foci after DNA damage, and Pol IV localized to them. To investigate if Pol IV localizes to double-strand breaks (DSBs), an I-SceI endonuclease-mediated DSB was introduced close to a fluorescently labeled LacO array on the chromosome. After DSB induction, Pol IV localized to the DSB site in ∼70% of SOS-induced cells. RecA also formed foci at the DSB sites, and Pol IV localized to the RecA foci. These results suggest that Pol IV interacts with RecAin vivoand is recruited to sites of DSBs to aid in the restoration of DNA replication.IMPORTANCEDNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB) is an error-prone DNA polymerase capable of bypassing DNA lesions and aiding in the restart of stalled replication forks. In this work, we demonstratein vivolocalization of fluorescently tagged Pol IV to the nucleoid after DNA damage and to DNA double-strand breaks. We show colocalization of Pol IV with two proteins: Rep DNA helicase, which participates in replication, and RecA, which catalyzes recombinational repair of stalled replication forks. Time course experiments suggest that Pol IV recruits Rep and that RecA recruits Pol IV. These findings providein vivoevidence that Pol IV aids in maintaining genomic stability not only by bypassing DNA lesions but also by participating in the restoration of stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Structural basis of HMCES interactions with DNA reveals multivalent substrate recognition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levon Halabelian ◽  
Mani Ravichandran ◽  
Yanjun Li ◽  
Hong Zheng ◽  
L. Aravind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Substrate Recognition ◽  
Catalytic Triad ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Abasic Sites ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks ◽  
Gapped Dna

ABSTRACTHMCES can covalently crosslink to abasic sites in single-stranded DNA at stalled replication forks to prevent genome instability. Here, we report crystal structures of the HMCES SRAP domain in complex with DNA-damage substrates, revealing interactions with both single-stranded and duplex segments of 3’ overhang DNA. HMCES may also bind gapped DNA and 5’ overhang structures to align single stranded abasic sites for crosslinking to the conserved Cys2 of its catalytic triad.

scholarly journals DNA Damage Discrimination at Stalled Replication Forks by the Rad5 Homologs HLTF and SHPRH

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
George-Lucian Moldovan ◽  
Alan D. D'Andrea
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

DNA damage-induced accumulation of Rad18 protein at stalled replication forks in mammalian cells involves upstream protein phosphorylation

2004 ◽  
Vol 323 (3) ◽  
pp. 831-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Nikiforov ◽  
Maria Svetlova ◽  
Lioudmila Solovjeva ◽  
Lioudmila Sasina ◽  
Joseph Siino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Protein Phosphorylation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

scholarly journals The Fission Yeast Crb2/Chk1 Pathway Coordinates the DNA Damage and Spindle Checkpoint in Response to Replication Stress Induced by Topoisomerase I Inhibitor

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (17) ◽  
pp. 7889-7899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Collura ◽  
Joel Blaisonneau ◽  
Giuseppe Baldacci ◽  
Stefania Francesconi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Replicative Stress

ABSTRACT Living organisms experience constant threats that challenge their genome stability. The DNA damage checkpoint pathway coordinates cell cycle progression with DNA repair when DNA is damaged, thus ensuring faithful transmission of the genome. The spindle assembly checkpoint inhibits chromosome segregation until all chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle, ensuring accurate partition of the genetic material. Both the DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways participate in genome integrity. However, no clear connection between these two pathways has been described. Here, we analyze mutants in the BRCT domains of fission yeast Crb2, which mediates Chk1 activation, and provide evidence for a novel function of the Chk1 pathway. When the Crb2 mutants experience damaged replication forks upon inhibition of the religation activity of topoisomerase I, the Chk1 DNA damage pathway induces sustained activation of the spindle checkpoint, which in turn delays metaphase-to-anaphase transition in a Mad2-dependent fashion. This new pathway enhances cell survival and genome stability when cells undergo replicative stress in the absence of a proficient G2/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document