scholarly journals Rad4TopBP1, a Scaffold Protein, Plays Separate Roles in DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints and DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 3456-3468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Taricani ◽  
Teresa S.F. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Novel Mutation ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Brct Domain ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Sensor Proteins

Rad4TopBP1, a BRCT domain protein, is required for both DNA replication and checkpoint responses. Little is known about how the multiple roles of Rad4TopBP1 are coordinated in maintaining genome integrity. We show here that Rad4TopBP1 of fission yeast physically interacts with the checkpoint sensor proteins, the replicative DNA polymerases, and a WD-repeat protein, Crb3. We identified four novel mutants to investigate how Rad4TopBP1 could have multiple roles in maintaining genomic integrity. A novel mutation in the third BRCT domain of rad4+TopBP1 abolishes DNA damage checkpoint response, but not DNA replication, replication checkpoint, and cell cycle progression. This mutant protein is able to associate with all three replicative polymerases and checkpoint proteins Rad3ATR-Rad26ATRIP, Hus1, Rad9, and Rad17 but has a compromised association with Crb3. Furthermore, the damaged-induced Rad9 phosphorylation is significantly reduced in this rad4TopBP1 mutant. Genetic and biochemical analyses suggest that Crb3 has a role in the maintenance of DNA damage checkpoint and influences the Rad4TopBP1 damage checkpoint function. Taken together, our data suggest that Rad4TopBP1 provides a scaffold to a large complex containing checkpoint and replication proteins thereby separately enforcing checkpoint responses to DNA damage and replication perturbations during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Critical role of SMG7 in activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis in response to genotoxic stress

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Ho ◽  
Hongwei Luo ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yi Tang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Essential Step

AbstractCHK1 is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint kinase and its activation, which requires ATR and RAD17, leads to inhibition of DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Recently, we reported that SMG7 stabilizes and activates p53 to induce G1 arrest upon DNA damage; here we show that SMG7 plays a critical role in the activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis. Following genotoxic stress, SMG7-null cells exhibit deficient ATR signaling, indicated by the attenuated phosphorylation of CHK1 and RPA32, and importantly, unhindered DNA replication and fork progression. Through its 14-3-3 domain, SMG7 interacts directly with the Ser635-phosphorylated RAD17 and promotes chromatin retention of the 9-1-1 complex by the RAD17-RFC, an essential step to CHK1 activation. Furthermore, through maintenance of CHK1 activity, SMG7 controls G2-M transition and facilitates orderly cell cycle progression during recovery from replication stress. Taken together, our data reveals SMG7 as an indispensable signaling component in the ATR-CHK1 pathway during genotoxic stress response.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Regulation of E2F1 by BRCT Domain-Containing Protein TopBP1

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 3287-3304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Liu ◽  
Fang-Tsyr Lin ◽  
J. Michael Ruppert ◽  
Weei-Chin Lin
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Brct Domain ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Dna Topoisomerase ◽  
E2f Transcription Factor ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACT The E2F transcription factor integrates cellular signals and coordinates cell cycle progression. Our prior studies demonstrated selective induction and stabilization of E2F1 through ATM-dependent phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. Here we report that DNA topoisomerase IIβ binding protein 1 (TopBP1) regulates E2F1 during DNA damage. TopBP1 contains eight BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) motifs and upon DNA damage is recruited to stalled replication forks, where it participates in a DNA damage checkpoint. Here we demonstrated an interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1. The interaction depended on the amino terminus of E2F1 and the sixth BRCT domain of TopBP1. It was specific to E2F1 and was not observed in E2F2, E2F3, or E2F4. This interaction was induced by DNA damage and phosphorylation of E2F1 by ATM. Through this interaction, TopBP1 repressed multiple activities of E2F1, including transcriptional activity, induction of S-phase entry, and apoptosis. Furthermore, TopBP1 relocalized E2F1 from diffuse nuclear distribution to discrete punctate nuclear foci, where E2F1 colocalized with TopBP1 and BRCA1. Thus, the specific interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1 during DNA damage inhibits the known E2F1 activities but recruits E2F1 to a BRCA1-containing repair complex, suggesting a direct role of E2F1 in DNA damage checkpoint/repair at stalled replication forks.

A method for assaying the sensitivity of Drosophila replication checkpoint mutants to anti-cancer and DNA-damaging drugs.

Genome ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 881-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M Radcliffe ◽  
Elizabeth A Silva ◽  
Shelagh D Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Tumor Formation ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Genes ◽  
Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

In multi-cellular organisms, failure to properly regulate cell-cycle progression can result in inappropriate cell death or uncontrolled cell division leading to tumor formation. To guard against such events, conserved regulatory mechanisms called "checkpoints" block progression into mitosis in response to DNA damage and incomplete replication, as well as in response to other signals. Checkpoint mutants in organisms as diverse as yeast and humans are sensitive to various chemical agents that inhibit DNA replication or cause DNA damage. This phenomenon is the primary rationale for chemotherapy, which uses drugs that preferentially target tumor cells with compromised checkpoints. In this study, we demonstrate the use of Drosophila checkpoint mutants as a system for assaying the effects of various DNA-damaging and anti-cancer agents in a developing multicellular organism. Dwee1, grp and mei-41 are genes that encode kinases that function in the DNA replication checkpoint. We tested zygotic mutants of each gene for sensitivity to the DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU), methyl methanosulfonate (MMS), ara-C, cisplatin, and the oxygen radical generating compound paraquat. The mutants show distinct differences in their sensitivity to each of the drugs tested, suggesting an underlying complexity in the responses of individual checkpoint genes to genotoxic stress.Key words: hydroxyurea (HU), ara-C, cisplatin, methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), paraquat.

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Yeast Lacking the Histone Chaperone Anti-Silencing Function 1

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 10313-10327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Josh Ramey ◽  
Susan Howar ◽  
Melissa Adkins ◽  
Jeffrey Linger ◽  
Judson Spicer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Histone Chaperone ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna

ABSTRACT The packaging of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin is likely to be important for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Chromatin structures are assembled onto newly synthesized DNA by the action of chromatin assembly factors, including anti-silencing function 1 (ASF1). To investigate the role of chromatin structure in the maintenance of genomic integrity, we examined budding yeast lacking the histone chaperone Asf1p. We found that yeast lacking Asf1p accumulate in metaphase of the cell cycle due to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Furthermore, yeast lacking Asf1p are highly sensitive to mutations in DNA polymerase alpha and to DNA replicational stresses. Although yeast lacking Asf1p do complete DNA replication, they have greatly elevated rates of DNA damage occurring during DNA replication, as indicated by spontaneous Ddc2p-green fluorescent protein foci. The presence of elevated levels of spontaneous DNA damage in asf1 mutants is due to increased DNA damage, rather than the failure to repair double-strand DNA breaks, because asf1 mutants are fully functional for double-strand DNA repair. Our data indicate that the altered chromatin structure in asf1 mutants leads to elevated rates of spontaneous recombination, mutation, and DNA damage foci formation arising during DNA replication, which in turn activates cell cycle checkpoints that respond to DNA damage.

scholarly journals DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Xiao Chao ◽  
Cere E. Poovey ◽  
Ashley A. Privette ◽  
Gavin D. Grant ◽  
Hui Yan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

scholarly journals Cdc25A Serine 123 Phosphorylation Couples Centrosome Duplication with DNA Replication and Regulates Tumorigenesis

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 7442-7450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sathyavageeswaran Shreeram ◽  
Weng Kee Hee ◽  
Dmitry V. Bulavin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Centrosome Duplication ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cdc25a Phosphatase

ABSTRACT The cell division cycle 25A (Cdc25A) phosphatase is a critical regulator of cell cycle progression under normal conditions and after stress. Stress-induced degradation of Cdc25A has been proposed as a major way of delaying cell cycle progression. In vitro studies pointed toward serine 123 as a key site in regulation of Cdc25A stability after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). To address the role of this phosphorylation site in vivo, we generated a knock-in mouse in which alanine was substituted for serine 123. The Cdc25 S123A knock-in mice appeared normal, and, unexpectedly, cells derived from them exhibited unperturbed cell cycle and DNA damage responses. In turn, we found that Cdc25A was present in centrosomes and that Cdc25A levels were not reduced after IR in knock-in cells. This resulted in centrosome amplification due to lack of induction of Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation after IR specifically in centrosomes. Further, Cdc25A knock-in animals appeared sensitive to IR-induced carcinogenesis. Our findings indicate that Cdc25A S123 phosphorylation is crucial for coupling centrosome duplication to DNA replication cycles after DNA damage and therefore is likely to play a role in the regulation of tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Mutations in RAD27 define a potential link between G1 cyclins and DNA replication.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 4291-4302 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Vallen ◽  
F R Cross
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spontaneous Mutation ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Recombination Rates ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Increased Sensitivity

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has three G1 cyclin (CLN) genes with overlapping functions. To analyze the functions of the various CLN genes, we examined mutations that result in lethality in conjunction with loss of cln1 and cln2. We have isolated alleles of RAD27/ERC11/YKL510, the yeast homolog of the gene encoding flap endonuclease 1, FEN-1.cln1 cln2 rad27/erc11 cells arrest in S phase; this cell cycle arrest is suppressed by the expression of CLN1 or CLN2 but not by that of CLN3 or the hyperactive CLN3-2. rad27/erc11 mutants are also defective in DNA damage repair, as determined by their increased sensitivity to a DNA-damaging agent, increased mitotic recombination rates, and increased spontaneous mutation rates. Unlike the block in cell cycle progression, these phenotypes are not suppressed by CLN1 or CLN2. CLN1 and CLN2 may activate an RAD27/ERC11-independent pathway specific for DNA synthesis that CLN3 is incapable of activating. Alternatively, CLN1 and CLN2 may be capable of overriding a checkpoint response which otherwise causes cln1 cln2 rad27/erc11 cells to arrest. These results imply that CLN1 and CLN2 have a role in the regulation of DNA replication. Consistent with this, GAL-CLN1 expression in checkpoint-deficient, mec1-1 mutant cells results in both cell death and increased chromosome loss among survivors, suggesting that CLN1 overexpression either activates defective DNA replication or leads to insensitivity to DNA damage.

scholarly journals The F-Box Protein Dia2 Regulates DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna M. Koepp ◽  
Andrew C. Kile ◽  
Swarna Swaminathan ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Origin Binding Protein ◽  
Cold Sensitive ◽  
F Box Protein

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis plays a key role in many pathways inside the cell and is particularly important in regulating cell cycle transitions. SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein) complexes are modular ubiquitin ligases whose specificity is determined by a substrate-binding F-box protein. Dia2 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae F-box protein previously described to play a role in invasive growth and pheromone response pathways. We find that deletion of DIA2 renders cells cold-sensitive and subject to defects in cell cycle progression, including premature S-phase entry. Consistent with a role in regulating DNA replication, the Dia2 protein binds replication origins. Furthermore, the dia2 mutant accumulates DNA damage in both S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These defects are likely a result of the absence of SCFDia2 activity, as a Dia2 ΔF-box mutant shows similar phenotypes. Interestingly, prolonging G1-phase in dia2 cells prevents the accumulation of DNA damage in S-phase. We propose that Dia2 is an origin-binding protein that plays a role in regulating DNA replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document