scholarly journals Supplemental Material: Origin of syn-collisional granitoids in the Gangdese orogen: Reworking of the juvenile arc crust and the ancient continental crust

Author(s):  
Yu-Wei Tang ◽  
Long Chen ◽  
et al.

Tables S1 and S2: zircon U-Pb ages, trace elements and Lu-Hf isotope data.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Wei Tang ◽  
Long Chen ◽  
et al.

Tables S1 and S2: zircon U-Pb ages, trace elements and Lu-Hf isotope data.


Lithos ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 119 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Belousova ◽  
Y.A. Kostitsyn ◽  
W.L. Griffin ◽  
G.C. Begg ◽  
S.Y. O'Reilly ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
L.V. SHUMLYANSKYY ◽  
V. KAMENETSKY ◽  
B.V. BORODYNYA

Results of a study of U-Pb and Hf isotope systematics and trace element concentrations in five zircon crystals separated from the Devonian Petrivske kimberlite are reported in the paper. Four zircons have yielded Paleoproterozoic and Archean ages, while one zircon grain gave a Devonian age of 383.6±4.4 Ma (weighted mean 206Pb/238U age). The Precambrian zircons have been derived from terrigenous rocks of the Mykolaivka Suite that is cut by kimberlite, or directly from the Precambrian rock complexes that constitute continental crust in the East Azov. The Devonian zircon crystal has the U-Pb age that corresponds to the age of kimberlite emplacement. It is 14 m.y. younger than zircon megacrysts found in the Novolaspa kimberlite pipe in the same area. In addition, Petrivske zircon is richer in trace elements than its counterparts from the Novolaspa pipe. Petrivske and Novolaspa zircons crystallized from two different proto-kimberlite melts, whereas the process of kimberlite formation was very complex and possibly included several episodes of formation of proto-kimberlite melts, separated by extended (over 10 M.y.) periods of time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léo A. Hartmann ◽  
Sérgio B. Baggio ◽  
Matheus P. Brückmann ◽  
Daniel B. Knijnik ◽  
Cristiano Lana ◽  
...  

Minerals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renyu Zeng ◽  
Jianqing Lai ◽  
Xiancheng Mao ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Jiandong Zhang ◽  
...  

The Alxa block is located in the southwestern margin of the North China Craton. The Paleoproterozoic tectonic evolution, crustal growth and tectonic affinity of the block remain unknown or controversial. The Longshoushan (LS) area is one of the few areas that outcrop Paleoproterozoic to crystalline basement rocks in the Alxa Block. In this study, we preset whole-rock geochemistry, zircon U–Pb geochronology and Lu–Hf isotope data from metagabbro, metadiorite, quartz syenite, granitic leucosome and pegmatoid leucosome in the LS area. These rocks all are enriched in LREE and LILE, and depleted in HREE and HFSE. Eight new LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb ages yielded three magmatic ages of 2044 Ma, 2029 Ma and 1940 Ma, and three metamorphic ages of 1891 Ma, 1848 Ma and 1812 Ma. Lu–Hf analyses reveal that the magmatic zircons and anatectic/metamorphic zircons from all the rock types are characterized by positive εHf(t) (−0.16 to 10.89) and variable εHf(t) (−11.21 to 6.24), respectively. Based on the previous studies and our new data, we conclude that the LS area experienced three magmatic events (2.5–2.45 Ga, ~2.1–2.0 Ga and ~1.95–1.91 Ga) and three regional metamorphism/anataxis events (~1.93–1.89 Ga, ~1.86–1.84 Ga and ~1.81 Ga) in Paleoproterozoic. The age–Hf isotope data establishes two main crustal growth events at ~2.9–2.5 Ga and ~2.2–2.0 Ga in the LS area. These data indicate that the LS area experienced intraplate extensional setting in the middle Paleoproterozoic, and continental subduction, collision and exhumation in the late Paleoproterozoic. Combining the geochronological framework and tectonic evolution, we suggest that the Alxa Block is part of the Khondalite Belt.


2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (18) ◽  
pp. A445
Author(s):  
N. Nikolić ◽  
S.Y. O’Reilly ◽  
W.L. Griffin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document