Some Reasons for Nonmonotonic Variation of Descrete-Phase Concentration in a Turbulent Two-Phase Jet

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-203
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Zuev
2021 ◽  
Vol 1047 (1) ◽  
pp. 012021
Author(s):  
Kh Sh Ilhamov ◽  
D Z Narzullaev ◽  
Sh T Ilyasov ◽  
B A Abdurakhmanov ◽  
K K Shadmanov

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. V. Alexandrov ◽  
I. V. Rakhmatullina ◽  
A. P. Malygin

1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-656
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Zuev ◽  
M. K. Laats ◽  
I. A. Lepeshinskii

2021 ◽  
Vol 2097 (1) ◽  
pp. 012003
Author(s):  
Zihan Guo ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Jinman Huang

Abstract The determination of pipe deposition and optimum conveying velocity in pneumatic conveying has an important impact on conveying efficiency. The Euler-Lagrange method DPM model is used to analyse five different particle sizes and densities of small particles, and the flow pattern in the horizontal pipeline at different particle sizes and densities is derived from the graphs of the maximum discrete phase concentration, particle trajectory and discrete phase concentration distribution for each working condition. The simulation results show that the deposition increases with particle size and density, the optimum conveying speed increases with particle size and density, the larger the deposition, the larger the required conveying velocity. The velocity of 2 m/s can make the particles below 20μm suspended transport, the velocity of 4 m/s allows particles with a particle size of 30μm and a density of 1000 kg/m3 or less to be transported in suspension and 6 m/s allows particles with a density of 2000 kg/m3 or less to be transported in suspension. The aim is to provide a reference for the design of pneumatic conveying systems and the selection of the optimum conveying velocity.


Author(s):  
K. P. Staudhammer ◽  
L. E. Murr

The effect of shock loading on a variety of steels has been reviewed recently by Leslie. It is generally observed that significant changes in microstructure and microhardness are produced by explosive shock deformation. While the effect of shock loading on austenitic, ferritic, martensitic, and pearlitic structures has been investigated, there have been no systematic studies of the shock-loading of microduplex structures.In the current investigation, the shock-loading response of millrolled and heat-treated Uniloy 326 (thickness 60 mil) having a residual grain size of 1 to 2μ before shock loading was studied. Uniloy 326 is a two phase (microduplex) alloy consisting of 30% austenite (γ) in a ferrite (α) matrix; with the composition.3% Ti, 1% Mn, .6% Si,.05% C, 6% Ni, 26% Cr, balance Fe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document