Experimental and numerical simulation of the acquisition of chemical remanent magnetization and the Thellier procedure

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Shcherbakov ◽  
N. K. Sycheva ◽  
S. K. Gribov
Nature ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 327 (6123) ◽  
pp. 610-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura B. Stokking ◽  
Lisa Tauxe

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven W. Denyszyn ◽  
Don W. Davis ◽  
Henry C. Halls

The north–south-trending Clarence Head dyke swarm, located on Devon and Ellesmere Islands in the Canadian High Arctic, has a trend orthogonal to that of the Neoproterozoic Franklin swarm that surrounds it. The Clarence Head dykes are dated by the U–Pb method on baddeleyite to between 716 ± 1 and 713 ± 1 Ma, ages apparently younger than, but within the published age range of, the Franklin dykes. Alpha recoil in baddeleyite is considered as a possible explanation for the difference in ages, but a comparison of the U–Pb ages of grains of equal size from both swarms suggests that recoil distances in baddeleyite are lower than those in zircon and that the Clarence Head dykes are indeed a distinctly younger event within the period of Franklin magmatism. The Clarence Head dykes represent a large swarm tangential to, and cogenetic with, a giant radiating dyke swarm ∼800 km from the indicated source. The preferred mechanism for the emplacement of the Clarence Head dykes is the exploitation of concentric zones of extension around a depleting and collapsing plume source. While the paleomagnetism of most Clarence Head dykes agrees with that of the Franklin dykes, two dykes have anomalous remanence directions, interpreted to be a chemical remanent magnetization carried by pyrrhotite. The pyrrhotite was likely deposited from fluids mobilized southward from the Devonian Ellesmerian Orogeny to the north that used the interiors of the dykes as conduits and precipitated pyrrhotite en route.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (20) ◽  
pp. 11100-11108
Author(s):  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Adrian R. Muxworthy ◽  
Dong Jia ◽  
Guoqi Wei ◽  
Bin Xia ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1169-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyal O. Bacon ◽  
Charles L. Elliot

Redox chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) results from current flow associated with a redox potential cell. An active redox cell covered by later volcanics may continue in operation for a period of time, sufficiently long that the current flowing in the overlying volcanics will cause or assist in the remobilization of iron. The remobilization may be either in situ as an alteration of minerals or by actual migration as a ferrous hydroxide, with fixation at a higher Eh nearer the surface. Redox CRM will leave a characteristic pattern as a magnetic memory in the rocks. Measurement of the magnetic rock properties and interpretation of resulting patterns can be used to locate the ancient redox cell. Redox cells in nature are usually associated with oxidizing sulfide deposits. Under appropriate conditions, redox CRM can be utilized as an indirect method for sulfide exploration. Field results for two porphyry sulfide deposits and a massive sulfide deposit under approximately 400 m of post‐mineral volcanic cover demonstrate the feasibility of this technique. Field tests in nonsulfide areas indicate that pervasive occurrence of false redox CRM anomalies do not exist except in the presence of sulfides. Laboratory experiments in the simulation of the redox CRM concept give support to the theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document