In wealthier countries, patients perceive worse impact of the disease although they have lower objectively assessed disease activity: results from the cross-sectional COMORA study

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polina Putrik ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Monika Hifinger ◽  
Andras P Keszei ◽  
Ihsane Hmamouchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo investigate patterns in patient-reported and physician-reported disease outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from countries with different level of socioeconomic development.MethodsData from a cross-sectional multinational study (COMOrbidities in RA) were used. Contribution of socioeconomic welfare (gross domestic product (GDP); low vs high) of country of residence to physician-reported (tender joint count, swollen joint count (SJC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, disease activity score based on 28 joints assessment (DAS28)-3v based on these three components and physician global assessment) and patient-reported (modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), patient global assessment and fatigue) disease outcomes was explored in linear regressions, adjusting for relevant confounders.ResultsIn total, 3920 patients with RA from 17 countries (30 to 411 patients per country) were included, with mean age of 56 years (SD13) and 82% women. Mean SJC varied between 6.7 (Morocco) and 0.9 (The Netherlands), mean mHAQ ranged between 0.7 (Taiwan) and 1.5 (The Netherlands). Venezuela had the lowest (1.7) and the Netherlands the highest score on fatigue (5.0). In fully adjusted models, lower GDP was associated with worse physician-reported outcomes (1.85 and 2.84 more swollen and tender joints, respectively, and 1.0 point higher DAS28-3v), but only slightly worse performance-based patient-reported outcome (0.15 higher mHAQ), and with better evaluation-based patient-reported outcomes (0.43 and 0.97 points lower on patient global assessment and fatigue, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with RA, important differences in physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes across countries were seen, with overall a paradox of worse physician-reported outcomes but better patient-reported outcomes in low-income countries, while results indicate that these outcomes in multinational studies should be interpreted with caution. Research on explanatory factors of this paradox should include non-disease driven cultural factors influencing health.

Associations between physicians’ global assessment of disease activity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A longitudinal study

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110279
Author(s):  
Worawit Louthrenoo ◽  
Nuntana Kasitanon ◽  
Eric Morand ◽  
Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Longitudinal Associations

Objective To determine longitudinal associations between Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients attending a rheumatology clinic between 2013 and 2017 completed specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys and rated their global rating of change (GRC) at each visit. PGA, SLEDAI-2K and SLE Flare Index (SFI) were also captured on all visits. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) methods were used to examine longitudinal associations of PGA with PROs and clinical indicators. Results 337 patients were followed for a median [IQR] of 3.2 [1.6, 3.4] years (2,059 visits). High PGA (>1) was strongly associated with high SLEDAI-2K scores, the presence of flares and poor PROs. Odd ratios (OR) [95% CI] of PGA > 1 in patients with SLEDAI-2K >4 & <10 and SLEDAI-2K ≥10, compared to SLEDAI-2K ≤ 4, were 3.46 [2.36, 5.08], p < 0.001 and 6.39 [4.30, 9.49], p < 0.001, respectively. OR [95% CI] of PGA > 1 in patients with mild-to-moderate or severe flares were 2.09 [1.62, 2.71], p < 0.001 and 4.42 [3.21, 6.07], p < 0.001, respectively. Mental components of both SLEQOL (mood, self-image) and SF36 (MCS) surveys demonstrated significant associations with high PGA. After adjusting for SLEDAI-2K, one-point increase in PGA was associated with reductions in SLEQOL total score and SF36-MCS by 2.33 (regression coefficient (RC) [95% CI] = −2.33 [−3.77, −0.88], p = 0.002), and 4.16 (RC [95% CI] = −4.16 [−5.19, −3.13], p < 0.001) points, respectively. Associations of some physical components (SLEQOL-symptoms, and SF36-PCS) with PGA attenuated when adjusted for SLEDAI-2K. Patients who rated low scores of GRC, which indicate health deterioration, were twice as likely to have PGA > 1 (OR [95%CI] 1.99 [1.25, 3.16], p = 0.004). Conclusion High PGA was strongly associated with poor mental health, high disease activity and flares. This study confirms the value of PGA as an efficient assessment tool for SLE.

scholarly journals POS0830 FACTORS INFLUENCING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 668.2-669
Author(s):  
S. Monti ◽  
P. Delvino ◽  
C. Klersy ◽  
G. Coppa ◽  
A. Milanesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Damage Accrual ◽  
Patient Reported

Background:Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are currently poorly integrated in the clinical evaluation of disease activity in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV).Objectives:To assess the distribution of the Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) in patients with AAV in stable remission, and to identify correlates of PtGA; to assess the discordance between PtGA score and PhGA.Methods:Patients with a diagnosis of AAV [eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis] in stable, complete remission (defined by a BVAS=0) and with a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)=0 were included. A questionnaire including several aspects of disease captured by PROs was collected. PtGA on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was assessed, with higher scores representing higher/worse levels of disease activity. Similarly, VAS for pain, chronic damage according to the patient’s opinion, general health (GH), fatigue, and sleep quality were collected. The worst symptom in the patient’s opinion affecting the overall assessment of disease activity was recorded. The Cragg Hurdle model was used to assess the predictors of PtGA.Results:65 patients were included, female 57%, mean age 61±12 years. Mean disease duration at enrollment was 8±6 years. Mean vasculitis damage index (VDI) was 4.4 ±2.3, with 45% of patients having a VDI ≥ 5. Despite having been classified as being in remission, PtGA was elevated in 37% of patients. We explored several correlates of PtGA. Higher degree of damage accrual (VDI) did not influence the patient’s evaluation of current disease activity. Similarly, we did not identify a correlation between older age, educational level, number of organ-systems involved, number of comorbidities, the number of previous major or minor relapses, higher disease duration, nor the type of AAV diagnosis (figure 1, panel A). Only sex significantly correlated with PtGA scores: 19 (51%) of female patients reported an elevated PtGA compared to only 5 (18%) of male (p=0.009). PtGA resulted to be significantly correlated with other (mostly modifiable) PROs including VAS pain, perception of the level of chronic damage accrual, GH, and fatigue (figure 1, panel B). The agreement between patients’ and physicians’ assessments of disease activity was 63%. Patients reported pain, followed by chronic respiratory symptoms to be the worst-experienced ongoing manifestations affecting their evaluation of disease activity.Conclusion:A significant proportion of patients with AAV considered to be in remission by the physician still declares to have persistent aspects of uncontrolled disease. PtGA is significantly influenced by persistent pain and fatigue, which warrant better assessment in the future.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Increasing Treatment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Not Determined by the Disease Activity Score But by Physician Global Assessment: Results from the CATCH Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2081-2087 ◽  
Author(s):  
LONNIE PYNE ◽  
VIVIAN P. BYKERK ◽  
GILLES BOIRE ◽  
BOULOS HARAOUI ◽  
CAROL HITCHON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Joint Involvement ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Treatment Intensification

Objective.To determine the factors most strongly associated with an increase in therapy of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).Methods.Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) were included if the patient had ≥ 2 visits and baseline and 6 months data. A regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with treatment intensification.Results.Of 1145 patients with ERA, 790 met inclusion criteria; mean age was 53.4 years (SD 14.7), mean disease duration 6.1 months (SD 2.8), 75% were female, baseline Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 4.7 (SD 1.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.8) at 6 months for included patients. Univariate factors for intensifying treatment were physician global assessment (MDGA; OR 7.8 and OR 7.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, p < 0.0005), swollen joint count (SJC; OR 4.7 and OR 7.3 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005), and DAS28 (OR 3.0 and OR 4.6 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005). In the regression model only MDGA was strongly associated with treatment intensification (OR 1.5 and OR 1.2 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005); DAS28 was not consistently predictive (OR 1.0, p = 0.987, and OR 1.2, p = 0.023, at 3 and 6 months). DAS28 was the reason for treatment intensification 2.3% of the time, compared to 51.7% for SJC, 49.9% for tender joint count, and 23.8% for MDGA. For the same SJC, larger joint involvement was more likely to influence treatment than small joints at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.027).Conclusion.MDGA was strongly associated with an increase in treatment at 3 and 6 months in ERA, whereas DAS28 was not. Physicians rarely stated that DAS28 was the reason for increasing treatment.

scholarly journals Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Strand ◽  
Jeffrey Kaine ◽  
Rieke Alten ◽  
Gene Wallenstein ◽  
Annette Diehl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson’s Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients. Results Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients. Conclusions This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients’ perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009)

scholarly journals Impact of Comorbidities on Disease Activity, Patient Global Assessment, and Function in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 825-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Silvia Scriffignano ◽  
Ana Belen Azuaga ◽  
Julio Ramirez ◽  
Juan D. Cañete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Function

The Uses of Disease Activity Scoring and the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity for Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis in Rheumatology Practice

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. TIMOTHY HARRINGTON
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Soft Tissue Rheumatism ◽  
Assessment Of Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatology Practice

Objective.To evaluate the uses of quantitative disease activity scoring and a physician global assessment of disease activity for managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in rheumatology practice.Methods.The Global Arthritis Score (GAS) and a physician global assessment (Physician Global) were determined during each office visit for a community practice RA population. The GAS was calculated from patients’ self-reported pain, functional assessment, and tender joint count. The Physician Global was recorded on a 10-point visual analog scale. The correlation of these 2 disease activity measures was determined for the most recent office visit of 185 patients with RA, and the reasons for discordant results were identified by chart review.Results.The GAS and Physician Global were concordant for active or inactive disease in 126 of 185 patients (68%) and were discordant in 59 (32%). Forty-five of these discordant patients had a high GAS while their Physician Global indicated inactive disease. Their GAS values were high because of osteoarthritis, back pain, soft tissue rheumatism, and/or prior joint damage rather than active RA. The other 14 patients had a low GAS with an uncontrolled Physician Global for a variety of reasons.Conclusion.(1) An RA disease activity score and a quantitative Physician Global can be measured during rheumatology office visits to document patients’ disease status. (2) Disease activity scoring contributes valuable information, but should not replace the Physician Global in guiding RA patient management or reimbursement decisions.

scholarly journals AB0703 WHICH OF THE ASDAS OR BASDAI CORRELATES BETTER WITH PHYSICIAN GLOBAL ASSESSMENT?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1647.4-1647
Author(s):  
K. Maatallah ◽  
W. Triki ◽  
H. Ferjani ◽  
D. Kaffel ◽  
W. Hamdi
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
The Mean

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity score (ASDAS) was developed because of the limitations of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Index (BASDAI) of being totally patient-derived with limited face and construct validity. ASDAS includes inflammatory markers that were aimed to increase its face validity by representing a different ‘objective’ domain of disease activity that was not included in BASDAI.Objectives:The aim of our study was to compare correlation of ASDAS and BASDAI with physician global assessment (PhGA) in order to know which is more reliable.Methods:Cross-sectional study including patients with SpA according to the ASAS criteria of 2009 and/or New York modified criteria. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the C-reactive protein (crp) were measured. The disease activity was assessed by BASDAI and ASDAS. Physician global assessment (PhGA) was rated by 0–100 numeric score. We correlated disease activity indices with physician global assessment by Pearson coefficient.Results:A total of 110 patients (68 men and 42 women) with a mean age of 43.18 ±12.34 [19-79] years was collected. The mean disease duration was 5.99±2.31 [1-10] years. The mean ESR and CRP were respectively 28.41±21.51 [2-110] and 15.56 ±23.84 [0-153] mg/l. ESR was correlated with PhGA (p=0.06, r=0.300), however CRP was not correlated with PhGA (p=0.134, r=0.165). The mean ASDAS-ESR and ASDAS-CRP were respectively 2.93±1.05 [0.83-5.65] and 2.81±0.97 [0.29-4.77]. The mean BASDAI was 4.42±2.23 [0-9.2]. The mean PhGA was 5.43 ±2.31 [1-10]. The BASDAI correlated with PhGA (p=0.007, r=0.307). In addition, ASDAS-ESR and ASDAS-CRP correlated with PhGA (p=0.001, r=0.372, p=0.001, r=0.391) respectively.Conclusion:In conclusion both BASDAI and ASDAS are equal, with a superiority nonetheless for the ASDAS since it correlated stronger with PhGA.Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document