AB0471 Risk Factors for Pregnancy Morbidity in Patients with Antiphospholipid Antibodies without A Defined Clinical Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1067.1-1067
Author(s):  
R. Demetrio Pablo ◽  
P. Muñoz ◽  
L. Riancho-Zarrabeitia ◽  
V. Calvo-Río ◽  
M. Lόpez-Hoyos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

scholarly journals POS0712 “EXTRA”- CRITERIA ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (PRELIMINARY DATA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 605.2-606
Author(s):  
F. Cheldieva ◽  
T. Reshetnyak ◽  
M. Cherkasova ◽  
N. Seredavkina ◽  
A. Lila
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Past History ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Background:The study of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), not included in the Sydney diagnostic criteria, in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is poorly understood.Objectives:To determine the frequency of detection of IgA-aCL and IgA-aβ2GP1 and IgG antibodies to β2GP1 domain 1 (IgG-aβ2GP1-D1) in patients with APS with and without SLE.Methods:ELISA and chemiluminescence assays (CMA) were used to test 63 sera of patients: 22 (35%) with primary APS (pAPS) and 41 (65%) patients with APS and with SLE (secondary APS (sAPS)), with mean age 38,0 [33,0 – 43,0] years and disease duration 4,0 [0,1 – 9,9]. Both methods were used to test of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1. CMA was used for research IgG/IgM/IgA-aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA-aβ2GPI and IgG-aβ2GP1-D1. Of them 49 (78%) (18 – with pAPS; 31 – with sAPS) displayed major thrombotic events and 18 of 22 pregnant women had pregnancy morbidity in past history. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity was in 9 out of 12 patients who had it determined. LA was not investigated due to anticoagulant therapy in the remaining 52 patients.Results:IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aß2GP1 were recorded in 44/18 and 50/17 patients by ELISA and in 55/19 and 59/16 by CMA, respectively.IgA-aCL positivity was found in 35 (56%) of 63 patients. Thirty IgA-positive patients were positive for IgG-aCL by ELISA: 22 – IgG-aCL – highly positive, 6 – medium positive and 2 – low positive patients. IgM-aCL by ELISA was detected in 13 (37%) of 35 IgA-aCL positive patients: 11 – highly positive, 1 – medium positive and 1 – low positive. IgA-aCL was combined with IgG-aCL in 34 patients and with IgM-aCL in 16 patients in the CMA. IgG-aß2GP1 in ELISA was detected in 32 patients with IgA-aCL (24 –highly positive, 5 – medium positive and 3 – low positive) and in 34 – in CMA. IgM-aß2GP1 was combined with IgA-aß2GP1 with the same frequency in both methods (in 13 patients).IgA-aß2GP1 was detected in 30 (48%) of 63 patients. They were combined with both IgG-aCL and IgG-aß2GP1 in all cases in both methods. IgM-aCL and IgM-aß2GP1 were detected in 14 and 11 of 30 patients with IgA-aß2GP1, respectively. The combination of IgA-aß2GP1 with IgG-aCL by ELISA was in 27 (in most cases highly positive – 20) and with IgM-aCL – in 10 (highly positive - 8). IgG-aß2GP1 was detected in 28 patients with IgA-aß2GP1 (high positive – 21) and in 11 patients with IgM-aß2GP1 (high positive –7).IgG-aß2GP1-D1 was revealed in 48 (76%) patients. It was combined with IgG-aCL – in 38, with IgM-aCL – in 15 patients by the ELISA. The combination of IgG-aß2GP1-D1 by CMA was as follows: with IgG-aCL – in 46, with IgM-aCL – in 17, and with IgA-aCL – in 33 patients. In most cases, IgG-aß2gp1-D1 was combined with highly positive aCL levels. IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was associated with IgG-aß2GP1 positivity in 42 – by ELISA and 47 – by CMA, IgМ-aβ2GP1 – in 13 and 14 patients by ELISA and CMA, respectively, and IgA-aß2GP1 – in 29. Isolated IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was not observed.Conclusion:The frequency of IgA-aCL detection was 56% (35 patients out of 63), IgA-aβ2GP1 – 48% (30 patients out of 63), IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 – 76% (48 patients out of 63). There was not isolated positivity of this “extra” criterial antibodies. The presence of IgA-aCL, IgA-aβ2GP1, IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 was associated with highly positivity of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM- aβ2GP1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Thrombosis and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 462-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Ortel
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Event ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Additional Risk ◽  
Initial Event ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic

Abstract The antiphospholipid syndrome is an antibody-mediated hypercoagulable state characterized by recurrent venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Several studies have determined that the frequency of antiphospholipid syndrome in patients presenting with a venous thromboembolic event is between 4% and 14%. Because of the high risk for recurrent thromboembolism in these patients, current recommendations suggest a longer, potentially lifelong, course of antithrombotic therapy following an initial event. Although most authorities agree on an extended course of therapy, considerable controversy surrounds the optimal target therapeutic INR for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. For an initial venous thromboembolic event, a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0 is supported by two prospective, randomized clinical trials. In contrast, relatively limited data exist for an initial arterial thromboembolic event in patients who have the antiphospholipid syndrome, and therapeutic recommendations range from aspirin to warfarin with a high target INR. Recurrent thromboembolic events can be extremely difficult to treat, and some patients may benefit from the addition of immunosuppressive therapies. Importantly, as many as 50% of the initial thromboembolic events sustained by patients with antiphospholipid antibodies occur in the setting of additional, coincident prothrombotic risk factors, indicating the importance of addressing any additional risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia, in these patients. Prospective studies are needed to address the role of thromboprophylactic strategies in asymptomatic individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies in the absence of additional risk factors.

Correlation between Osteoprotegerin Levels and Antiphospholipid Syndrome Parameters

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Caraiola ◽  
Alina Dima ◽  
Ciprian Jurcut ◽  
Ruxandra Jurcut ◽  
Cristian Baicus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Female Data

Abstract Objective To identify the osteoprotegerin (OPG) correlates with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) parameters. Methods Our cohort included 40 patients with primary APS disease associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (mean age, 43.7 years; 87% female). Data on cardiovascular risk factors and specific clinical events in APS were collected. Then we tested OPG and 10 criteria and noncriteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) on preserved specimens in all cases. Results A total of 26 patients (65%) had high serum OPG levels. Patients with high OPG were mostly overweight. In patients with SLE, the OPG levels were associated with anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and anti-Sm titers. However, we did not find significant correlations of the OPG with any of the 10 aPLs tested. Also, we found no relationship regarding venous APS events. Conclusion In APS, high OPG levels are not linked to serum aPL expression.

Central serous chorioretinopathy and antiphospholipid syndrome: Three cases report

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 096120332097973
Author(s):  
Paul Billoir ◽  
Adrien Michon ◽  
Luc Darnige
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent venous or arterial thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity, with persistently presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We report three cases of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) associated with APS.

scholarly journals Prevention of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome

Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 707-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Lim
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Thrombotic Complications

Abstract Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune condition characterized by thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity, and laboratory evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Management of these patients includes the prevention of a first thrombotic episode in at-risk patients (primary prevention) and preventing recurrent thrombotic complications in patients with a history of thrombosis (secondary prevention). Assessment of thrombotic risk in these patients, balanced against estimated bleeding risks associated with antithrombotic therapy could assist clinicians in determining whether antithrombotic therapy is warranted. Thrombotic risk can be assessed by evaluating a patient’s aPL profile and additional thrombotic risk factors. Although antithrombotic options for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been evaluated in clinical trials, studies in primary prevention of asymptomatic aPL-positive patients are needed. Primary prevention with aspirin may be considered in asymptomatic patients who have a high-risk aPL profile, particularly if additional risk factors are present. Secondary prevention with long-term anticoagulation is recommended based on estimated risks of VTE recurrence, although routine evaluation of thrombotic risk can assist in determining whether ongoing anticoagulation is warranted. Studies that stratify thrombotic risk in aPL-positive patients, and patients with APS evaluating antithrombotic and non-antithrombotic therapies will be useful in optimizing the management of these patients.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Md. Motahar Hossain ◽  
Md. Akhter Hossain ◽  
Yasmin Rahman ◽  
Md. Kamrul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Pregnancy And Postpartum

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and obstetric morbidities in the setting of persistently positive levels of antiphospholipid antibodies. It may be primary or secondary. The latest classification criteria (Sydney 2006) recognize just three tests to define this syndrome- lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-?2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies. Treatment of thrombotic events involves lifelong anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) with only pregnancy morbidity is treated with thromboprophylaxis with heparin during pregnancy and postpartum for 6 weeks. In this review we discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: critical analysis of the diagnostic path

Lupus ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Pengo ◽  
A. Banzato ◽  
E. Bison ◽  
G. Denas ◽  
S. Padayattil Jose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Single Test ◽  
Single Class ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies ◽  
Domain I

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in the presence of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2glycoprotein I [aβ2GPI] antibodies). Each test may identify different autoantibodies; a single test makes the diagnosis possible when positive on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, single test positivity may be unrelated to pathogenic antibodies, which are now considered to be a subclass of aβ2GPI antibodies directed against the domain I of this protein. Conversely, all three positive tests identify a single class of aβ2GPI antibodies, thus identifying high-risk patients with APS.

Complement activation in patients with isolated antiphospholipid antibodies or primary antiphospholipid syndrome

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (03) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Seed ◽  
Kiran Parmar ◽  
Gary W. Moore ◽  
Sara E. Stuart-Smith ◽  
Beverley J. Hunt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Complement Activation ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
High Titre ◽  
Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Activation Products ◽  
Cardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Obstetric Aps

SummaryThe antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the association of thrombosis and recurrent pregnancy loss and/or pregnancy morbidity with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Increased complement activation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of APS in animal models. It was our objective to evaluate complement activation in patients with aPL or primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS). We measured complement activation products, fragments Bb and C3a–desArg by ELISA in 186 aPL/PAPS patients and 30 healthy controls. All patients with aPL had significantly increased levels of complement activation products. Fragment Bb levels (mean, 95% CI); (thrombotic APS 0.54 units/ml, 0.31–0.83, obstetric APS 0.60 units/ml,0.39–1.02, isolated aPL 0.48 units/ml, 0.29–0.85, overall 0.39 units/ml, 0.33–0.47) and C3a–desArg levels (mean, 95% CI): (thrombotic APS 261 ng/ml, 219–311, obstetric APS 308 ng/ml, 243–391, isolated aPL 258 ng/ml, 193–337, overall 225 ng/ml, 202–251) were significantly higher compared to controls (fragment Bb 0.06 units/ml, 0.03–0.11, C3a–desArg 69 ng/ml, 50–92). There were correlations between Fragment Bb and C3a–desArg levels in all patients with aPL. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis showed increased fragment Bb and C3a–desArg levels had strong associations with the presence of persistent lupus anticoagulant (area under ROC: Bb 0.89, and C3a–desArg 0.90), dual and triple aPL positivity (Bb 0.71–0.82, C3a–desArg 0.71–0.80) but not with high titre anti-cardiolipin antibodies (Bb 0.62, C3a–desArg 0.65), or anti β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (Bb 0.66, C3a–desArg 0.67). Complement activation is present in all patient groups within this large cohort of patients aPL. This suggests it may have a major role in the pathogenesis of APS and merits further study.

scholarly journals Review on Effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis in aPLs with and without Risk Factors for Thrombosis: Efficacy and Safety

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahid A. Qushmaq ◽  
Samar A. Al-Emadi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Traditional Risk Factors ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Context. Antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome is an autoimmune disorder that is characterized by the association between presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. Objectives. To systematically review the evidence for primary prophylaxis in patients with antiphospholipids antibodies syndrome or APS with or without other traditional risk factors of thrombosis when they did not have any thrombotic event yet. Methods. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Allied Health Literature were searched for studies that examined the efficacy and safety of primary prophylaxis in aPL patients from 1990 to February 2013. We examined literature looking at patients with aPLs with other risk factors for thrombosis and aPLs with no additional risk factors for thrombosis. Conclusion. We concluded that, in patients with aPLs, primary prophylaxes with HCQ and aspirin have been observed to reduce the frequency of thrombotic events in the case of asymptomatic aPL-positive patients with SLE. We also in this study concluded that LDA was effective in patients with autoimmune diseases. Independent cardiovascular risk factors include autoimmune defects such as SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, and atherosclerosis, where overall venous thrombosis will be induced by systemic inflammation. This review concludes that HCQ is an effective primary approach when compared to aspirin.

Microparticles: An Alternative Explanation to the Behavior of Vascular Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Álvarez ◽  
Carolina Rúa ◽  
Ángela P.J. Cadavid
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Murine Models ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

AbstractAntiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, along with occurrence of vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. The variety of antiphospholipid antibodies and their related mechanisms, as well as the behavior of disease in wide groups of patients, have led some authors to propose a differentiation of this syndrome into two independent entities: vascular and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Thus, previous studies have discussed whether specific autoantibodies may be responsible for this differentiation or, in contrast, how the same antibodies are able to generate two different clinical presentations. This discussion is yet to be settled. The capability of serum IgG from patients with vascular thrombosis to trigger the biogenesis of endothelial cell-derived microparticles in vitro is one of the previously discussed differences between the clinical entities of antiphospholipid syndrome. These vesicles constitute a prothrombotic mechanism as they can directly lead to clot activation in murine models and recalcified human plasma. Nevertheless, other indirect mechanisms by which microparticles can spread a procoagulant phenotype could be critical to understanding their role in antiphospholipid syndrome. For this reason, questions regarding the cargo of microparticles, and the signaling pathways involved in their biogenesis, are of interest in attempting to explain the behavior of this autoimmune disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document