scholarly journals THU0487 PERINEURAL INJECTION THERAPY; A NEW MODALITY IN MANAGEMENT OF MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN; A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Hassan Abu-Zaid ◽  
Samar Abd Alhamed Tabra
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Injection Therapy ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Perineural Injection

scholarly journals To Study the effect of Traditional Back Exercises vs Exercise Ball Exercise on Pain Intensity, Core Endurance and Limitation of Activities in Individuals with Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Jay Kumar Soni ◽  
Edrish Contractor
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Core Stability ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Swiss Ball

Aims: Non specific Low back pain is defined as pain without any known pathology which affects almost all the leading occupation where body's awkward posture, twisting and stress forces are commonly encountered across the globe and it is highly prevalent 60% to 70% in a year. Studies have shown various exercise regimen individual effect on the same but superiority of regimen out of these is not clear. Study Design: Comparative Study Place and Duration of Study: Ahmedabad Institute of Medical Sciences, Duration 2013-15 Objective: To assess and compare the effect of core stability exercise, back school program and Swiss ball exercise on Pain, core endurance and Functional disability. Methodology: A group of 24 patients having non-specific low back pain between age groups 18-40 were randomly selected and allocated in to two groups. Group A(n=12) received traditional exercise whereas Swiss ball exercise was given to Group B(n=12). The subjects were treated for two weeks. Baseline data for VAS, Core endurance and MODI were taken on day1 and at the end of two weeks Result: The results were analyzed by wilcoxon signed rank test within both groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS, core endurance and MODI at the end of 2weeks.Comparison between both the Group A and Group B was done by Mann- whitney U test and statistically no significant difference was seen in VAS, core endurance and MODI between the groups Conclusion: The study concluded that both the exercises are equally effective in reducing pain intensity, improves core endurance and functional status in subjects with non specific low back pain

scholarly journals Comparative Study Finds McKenzie Protocol 97% Effective against Lumbar Syndrome

AAOHN Journal ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 198-199
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Patient Response ◽  
Musculoskeletal Medicine ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Lumbar Syndrome ◽  
Mckenzie Method

A program utilizing patient response to repeated lumbar movements (including flexion, extension, lateral bending and rotation), known as the McKenzie method, has now been demonstrated to be twice as effective in alleviating low back pain compared to traction and back schools. This is a capsule summary of the “Extrac '86” study as detailed in The Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine 1987; vol. 4(9):27–34 and 4(12):63–74.

scholarly journals Acupoint Injection for Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Guanli Xie ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Xiaoxia Tang ◽  
Xiaobo Guo ◽  
Yanfei Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Injection Therapy ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Acupoint Injection ◽  
Effect Model

Introduction. Nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP) became a public health and economic problem. Acupoint injection was used widely for patients with NCLBP. However, there were inconsistent results on the efficacy for these people. Therefore, this review was performed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of acupoint injection. Materials and Methods. The literature sources were collected via EMBASE, Medline, CENTRAL, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and Sino-Med Database from their inception to October 13, 2019. Endnote X7, widely used document management software, was used to manage and screen the literature sources. Each record was screened according to the predetermined inclusion criteria by two review authors independently. Quality assessment tool, “Risk of table,” was used to assess the quality of the included studies according to the recommendation of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and verified by another reviewer. Any disagreement was addressed via consulting with a third reviewer in the abovementioned processes. All procedures were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results. This review included 13 studies involving 1381 patients with NCLBP. Quantitative analysis results indicated that there is no sufficient evidence that acupoint injection can improve the pain of patients with low back pain based on two trails: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS: MD = −1.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) −3.30 to 0.64, P = 0.18 , random-effect model). When assessing the effectiveness of acupoint injection therapy, the results indicated that acupoint injection can improve the effective rate for nonspecific chronic low back pain (OR = 3.64, 95% CI 2.4 to 5.21, P < 0.0001 , fixed-effect model). Conclusion. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that acupoint injection therapy could improve the pain for patients with NCLBP. However, the level of evidence was downgraded to “very low quality” because of the poor methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity. The results should be interpreted with caution. Higher quality RCTs with more appropriate comparison, more objective outcome instruments, and adequate follow-up periods are necessary to assess the efficacy of acupoint injection for NCLBP. The PROSPERO Research registration identifying number is CRD42019119158.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document