P26 An audit of the use of amikacin for early onset sepsis in premature neonates in an inpatient neonatal unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. e1.31-e1
Author(s):  
Dalton Caroline ◽  
Benzaken Tami ◽  
Tyszczuk Lidia ◽  
Gozar Ioana

AimIn April 2017 the Trust updated the Neonatal Infection Guideline due to increasing resistance to gentamicin. Subsequently, the first line aminoglycoside to treat early onset sepsis (EOS) on neonatal units (NNU) for patients ≤32 weeks gestation changed from gentamicin to amikacin.Updated guidance recommends prescribing amikacin 15 mg/kg 24 hourly, aiming for trough levels<5 mg/L; however anecdotal reports suggest this results in frequently high trough levels at 24 hours.Adherence to current guidelines was audited, to gain insight into the most appropriate dosing interval to use, particularly in extremely low birth weight (<1 kg) and extremely premature neonates (<28 weeks gestation at birth).Audit aims100% of patients prescribed amikacin for EOS adhere to criteria in Neonatal Infection Guideline100% of patients prescribed amikacin dose of 15 mg/kg100% of patients prescribed amikacin have a blood level taken at 24 hours (prior to giving second dose)100% of patients receive further doses of amikacin only when blood levels are <5 mg/L, or under the advice of a pharmacistMethodAudit standards were derived from hospital policy. All eligible neonates receiving amikacin were included. Neonates on postnatal wards were excluded; they should receive gentamicin for treatment of EOS.Prospective data collection was completed across both NNUs at the Trust, which included all neonates that received doses of amikacin from 1st April to 1st August 2017. Data were collected from drug charts and medical records. Data were also collected to account for factors that could contribute to or highlight that the patient suffered from poor renal output; degree of prematurity (gestational age), urine output, urea and electrolytes, any inotropic support, or a significant patent ductus arteriosus. Data were entered onto an Excel spread sheet and were summarised descriptively. The audit was approved locally.ResultsA total of 50 neonates received amikacin. 100% adhered to criteria in Neonatal Infection Guideline and 100% prescribed doses of 15 mg/kg. 12 patients (24%) did not have an amikacin level taken at 24 hours, of which 5 (42%) had stopped antibiotics and 7 (58%) had levels taken between 27–36 hours. Of the remaining 38 patients, only 6 (16%) had levels<5 mg/L at 24 hours. Nine (24%) patients then stopped antibiotics at 36 hours. 23 patients had levels taken at 36 hours, of which 17 (74%) could be classed as ‘in range’ at ≤5 mg/L. Two patients received doses despite levels of >5 mg/L. Final results are yet to be fully analysed, however it appears as though there is no direct correlation between gestational age, severity of illness and amikacin level results.ConclusionFindings suggest it is difficult to pre-determine how a patient will excrete amikacin, even when taking into account gestational age and birth weight; which would support the literature.¹ However, the majority of levels were high at 24 hours and within range by 36 hours, so change in practice from 24 hourly to 36 hourly dosing is recommended. Following implementation of the recommendations, further audit is necessary in one year.ReferenceAllegaert K, Anderson BJ, Cossey V, et al. Limited predictability of amikacin clearance in extreme premature neonates at birth. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology2005;61:39–48.

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e20.2-e21
Author(s):  
Kimberly Mak

AimGentamicin is widely used to treat early neonatal sepsis as part of a regimen recommended by NICE.1 However, it is frequently implicated in clinical incidents relating to errors in prescribing and administration. This project aimed to evaluate whether the introduction of ePMA had an effect on the frequency and type of incidents that occur relating to the use of gentamicin in neonates.MethodA paper gentamicin prescription chart was used from July 2013 until the implementation of ePMA on 28th January 2019. Using ePMA, prescribers were encouraged to use a pre-set template for ‘neonatal early onset sepsis’, listing benzylpenicillin and gentamicin (in mg/kg). Prescribers had to input the date and time of the first dose, and the system would automatically calculate the dose and time of subsequent administrations. A visual cue was used by the system to signal to nurses that a dose was due. Data was extracted from our local incident reporting system between the periods of 1st July 2013 to 27th January 2019 (‘pre-ePMA’) and 28th January 2019 to 30th June 2019 (‘post-ePMA’), where ‘gentamicin’ was mentioned in the incident description under the ‘neonates’ specialty. The data was examined, categorised into ‘prescribing-related’, ‘administration-related’, or ‘other’ and within the former two, grouped into identified themes.ResultsPre-ePMA 55 incidents were reported (mean=9/year, range 6–16/year), of which 41 (75%) were deemed to have the potential to cause harm. 27 (49%) incidents were prescribing-related and 19 (35%) were administration-related. The rest of the incidents were classed as ‘other’ eg. mislabelling blood samples. The most common prescribing-related incidents were incorrect frequency intervals, accidental omission, incorrect dose, or failing to meet prescribing standards. The most common administration-related incidents were doses being given too early, too late or missed. Four incidents were reported in the 5-month period post-ePMA (2 prescribing-related, 1 administration-related, 1 other). All prescribing- and administration-related incidents were deemed to have the potential to cause harm. One incident was due to incorrect frequency (first dose was given before arrival and prescriber had to manually calculate interval), one incident related to unintended doses prescribed and given (only benzylpenicillin was indicated), and one administration incident from poor documentation (dose given but not signed for). Compared with the same 5-month period in 2018 (pre-EPMA), 1 more incident had been reported this year compared to the previous year where only 3 incidents were reported.ConclusionThe introduction of ePMA may not reduce the number of reported incidents relating to gentamicin in neonates. A longer period of study is needed to evaluate the effects of transitioning from paper to ePMA. Our results suggest that ePMA can eliminate or reduce the risk of some types of errors, but can also make no difference to others, and can create new types of system-related errors, which can still have the potential to cause harm. This is consistent with the outcomes of a similar study in 2016 in another centre.2ReferencesNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Neonatal infection (early onset): antibiotics for prevention and treatment. Manchester: NICE; 2012.Kitson G. Implementation of an electronic prescription chart for gentamicin for neonatal units and postnatal wards. Arch Dis Child, 2016;101e2.


2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Cordero ◽  
Leona W. Ayers

AbstractObjectives:To study multicenter antibiotic practices for suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS) with negative blood cultures (NegBCs) and to identify opportunities for reduction of antimicrobial exposure.Design:Retrospective study.Setting:Thirty academic hospitals (University HealthSystem Consortium) located in 24 states.Methods:Data were from a survey of 790 extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Total antibiotic exposures (antibiotic-days per patient) were calculated.Results:On admission to the NICU, 94% of 790 ELBW infants had BCs performed and empiric antibiotics initiated. When PosBC and NegBC infants were compared, 47 patients with PosBCs were similar to 695 with NegBCs in birth weight, gestational age (GA), and mortality. Patients with suspected EOS but NegBCs given ampicillin/aminoglycosides were grouped by length of administration and GA. For GA of 26 weeks or younger, 170 infants given a short (≤ 3 days) and 157 given a long (≥ 7 days) course were similar regarding birth weight, mortality, antepartum history, and CRIB scores, but were different (P < .01) in number receiving a third antimicrobial (3% and 17%) and antibiotic-days (23 and 38). For GA of 27 weeks or older, 113 infants given a short and 77 given a long course differed (P < .01) in number receiving a third antimicrobial (2% and 23%) and antibiotic-days (19 and 30).Conclusions:Most suspected EOS infants with NegBCs are given antibiotics, but no antepartum historical risk factors or neonatal clinical signs explained prolonged administration. Discontinuing empiric antibiotics when BCs are negative in asymptomatic ELBW infants can reduce antimicrobial exposure without compromising clinical outcome.


Author(s):  
Sylvia Kirchengast ◽  
Beda Hartmann

The COVID 19 pandemic represents a major stress factor for non-infected pregnant women. Although maternal stress during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction, an increasing number of studies yielded no negative effects of COVID 19 lockdowns on pregnancy outcome. The present study focused on pregnancy outcome during the first COVID 19 lockdown phase in Austria. In particular, it was hypothesized that the national lockdown had no negative effects on birth weight, low birth weight rate and preterm birth rate. In a retrospective medical record-based single center study, the outcome of 669 singleton live births in Vienna Austria during the lockdown phase between March and July 2020 was compared with the pregnancy outcome of 277 live births at the same hospital during the pre-lockdown months of January and February 2020 and, in addition, with the outcome of 28,807 live births between 2005 and 2019. The rate of very low gestational age was significantly lower during the lockdown phase than during the pre-lockdown phase. The rate of low gestational age, however, was slightly higher during the lockdown phase. Mean birth weight was significantly higher during the lockdown phase; the rates of low birth weight, very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight were significantly lower during the lockdown phase. In contrast, maternal gestational weight gain was significantly higher during the lockdown phase. The stressful lockdown phase in Austria seems to have no negative affect on gestational length and newborn weight among non-infected mothers.


2002 ◽  
Vol 347 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Stoll ◽  
Nellie Hansen ◽  
Avroy A. Fanaroff ◽  
Linda L. Wright ◽  
Waldemar A. Carlo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document