scholarly journals 383 Ultrasound assessment of kidney length with duplex collecting system in infants

Author(s):  
Kristina Drnasin
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tainara Micaele Bezerra Peixoto ◽  
Jussara Peters Scheffer ◽  
Luciana De Macêdo Mello ◽  
Rodiney Pinheiro Denevitz ◽  
Márcia Rezende Faes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ureteral obstruction is a common indication for surgical intervention, due to the small size of the ureter, specialized instrumentation is required such as operating microscope for intraoperative magnification and microsutures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare 3 sizes of nylon 6 − 0,8 − 0,10 − 0 for ureterorrhaphy in the ureter of rabbits, using microsurgical technique. Results A total of fifteen male, adults, New Zealand rabbits were divided in three groups: all groups were submitted ureterotomy. A 2 mm longitudinal incision was made in the medial portion of the right ureter, followed by a partial perforating simple interrupted 6 − 0, 8 − 0 and 10 − 0 sutures in each group. During the experiment ultrasound evaluations were performed to assess the kidney length and width, the presence of ureteral calculi, the renal pelvic dilation, the ureter diameter and the presence of free liquid in the abdominal cavity. At the end of the experiment all kidneys and ureters were submitted to macroscopic and histopathological evaluations. In the first ultrasound assessment, all groups had an acute increase in renal length (p < 0.048). The group with 8 − 0 suture showed a difference in ureteral diameter on the 5th day (p < 0.01) and all groups showed a reduction in diameter on the 30th day. The group with 6 − 0 suture showed a high mortality rate during the experimental period and the histopathological evaluation exhibited areas of necrosis. According to the ultrasound evaluation caliber 10 − 0 achieved better results in, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations. The finer suture diameters had better outcomes according to the ureteral inflammation scores. Conclusions The use of 10 − 0 suture resulted in lower rates of ureteral inflammation, renal changes and postoperative complications when compared to two other sizes of the same material.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 319-319
Author(s):  
Vitaly Margulis ◽  
Edward D. Matsumoto ◽  
Stephanie Shaffer ◽  
Jeffrey A. Cadeddu
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 464-464
Author(s):  
Ithaar H. Derweesh ◽  
Gaspar A. Motta-Ramirez ◽  
Mahesh Gael ◽  
Nancy Obuchowski ◽  
Hazem A. Moneim ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 503-503
Author(s):  
Roger M. Mueller ◽  
Bernard Descoeudres ◽  
Werner W. Hochreiter ◽  
Urs E. Studer ◽  
Hansjoerg Danuser

1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (04) ◽  
pp. 170-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. V. Yester ◽  
Eva Dubovsky ◽  
C. D. Russell

Renal parenchymal transit time of the recently introduced radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-MAG3 (mercaptoacetylglycylglylcylglycinel) was measured in 37 kidneys, using factor analysis to separate parenchymal activity from that in the collecting system. A new factor algorithm was employed, based on prior interpolative background subtraction and use of the fact that the initial slope of the collecting system factor time-activity curve must be zero. The only operator intervention required was selection of a rectangular region enclosing the kidney (by identifying two points at opposite corners). Transit time was calculated from the factor time-activity curves both by deconvolution of the parenchymal factor curve and also by measuring the appearance time for collecting system activity from the collecting system factor curve. There was substantial agreement between the two methods. Factor analysis led to a narrower range of normal values than a conventional cortical region-of-interest method, presumably by decreasing crosstalk from the collecting system. In preliminary trials, the parenchymal transit time did not well separate four obstructed from seventeen unobstructed kidneys, but it successfully (p <0.05) separated six transplanted kidneys with acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis from 10 normal transplants.


Author(s):  
Yawen Wang ◽  
Stefanie Hammersen ◽  
Dag Moskopp

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document