scholarly journals 176 Do cervical spine, vestibulo-ocular, dynamic balance, and divided attention measures in elite youth ice hockey players return to baseline levels at time of medical clearance to return to play?

Author(s):  
Kathryn Schneider ◽  
Geoff Schneider ◽  
Carolyn Emery
2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. A58.3-A59
Author(s):  
Amanda M Black ◽  
Brian L Brooks ◽  
Regan S McLeod ◽  
Luz Palacios-Derflingher ◽  
Kathryn J Schneider ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S337
Author(s):  
K N Waninger ◽  
J G Richards ◽  
W T Pan ◽  
A R Shay ◽  
M K Shindle

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sean Echlin ◽  
Charles H. Tator ◽  
Michael D. Cusimano ◽  
Robert C. Cantu ◽  
Jack E. Taunton ◽  
...  

Object The authors investigated return-to-play duration for initial and recurrent concussion in the same season in 2 teams of junior (16–21-year-old) ice hockey players during a regular season. Methods The authors conducted a prospective cohort study during 1 junior regular season (2009–2010) of 67 male fourth-tier ice hockey players (mean age 18.2 ± 1.2 years [SD], range 16–21 years) from 2 teams. Prior to the start of the season, every player underwent baseline assessments that were determined using the Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool 2 (SCAT2) and the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT). The study protocol also required players who entered the study during the season to complete a baseline SCAT2 and ImPACT. If the protocol was not followed, the postinjury test results of a player without true baseline test results were compared with previously established age- and sex-matched group normative levels. Each game was directly observed by a physician and at least 1 neutral nonphysician observer. Players suspected of suffering a concussion were evaluated by the physician during the game. If a concussion was diagnosed, the player underwent clinical evaluation at the physician's office within 24 hours. The return-to-play decision was based on clinical evaluation guided by the Zurich return-to-play protocol (contained in the consensus statement of international expert opinion at the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008). This clinical evaluation and return-to-play protocol was augmented by the 2 tests (SCAT2 and ImPACT) also recommended by the Zurich consensus statement, for which baseline values had been obtained. Results Seventeen players sustained a physician-observed or self-reported, physician-diagnosed concussion during a physician-observed ice hockey game. The mean clinical return-to-play duration (in 15 cases) was 12.8 ± 7.02 days (median 10 days, range 7–29 days); the mean number of physician office visits by players who suffered a concussion (15 cases) was 2.1 ± 1.29 (median 1.5 visits). Five of the 17 players who sustained a concussion also suffered a recurrent or second concussion. One of the 5 individuals who suffered a repeat concussion sustained his initial concussion in a regular season game that was not observed by a physician, and as a result this single case was not included in the total of 21 concussions. This initial concussion of the player was identified during baseline testing 2 days after the injury and was subsequently medically diagnosed and treated. The mean interval between the first and second concussions in these 5 players was 78.6 ± 39.8 days (median 82 days), and the mean time between the return-to-play date of the first and second concussions was 61.8 ± 39.7 days (median 60 days). Conclusions The mean rates of return to play for single and recurrent concussions were higher than rates cited in recent studies involving sport concussions. The time interval between the first and second concussions was also greater than previously cited. This difference may be the result of the methodology of direct independent physician observation, diagnosis, and adherence to the Zurich return-to-play protocol.


Author(s):  
Michael D. Cusimano ◽  
Mary L. Chipman ◽  
Richard Volpe ◽  
Peter Donnelly

Abstract:Background and Objectives:In Canada and the USA, ice hockey is a cause of traumatic brain injury. Post-concussive symptoms are the most important feature of the diagnosis of concussion in sports and it is recommended that athletes not return to play while still symptomatic. Lack of knowledge of concussions could therefore be one of the main detriments to concussion prevention in hockey. The purpose of this research is to describe what minor league hockey players, coaches, parents and trainers know about concussion and its management.Methods:A questionnaire to assess concussion knowledge and return to play guidelines was developed and administered to players at different competitive levels (n = 267), coaches, trainers and parents (total adults n = 142) from the Greater Toronto Area.Results:Although a majority of adults and players could identify mechanisms responsible for concussion, about one-quarter of adults and about a quarter to a half of children could not recall any symptoms or recalled only one symptom of a concussion. A significant number of players and some adults did not know what a concussion was or how it occurred. Almost half of the players and a fifth of the adults incorrectly stated that concussion was treated with medication or physical therapy. Nearly one quarter of all players did not know if an athlete experiencing symptoms of concussion should continue playing.Conclusions:This study demonstrated that a significant number of people held misconceptions about concussion in hockey which could lead to serious health consequences and creates a need for better preventive and educational strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document