scholarly journals An alternative to the diagnostic dilatation and curettage--endometrial cytology.

BMJ ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 288 (6422) ◽  
pp. 981-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
D W Polson ◽  
A Morse ◽  
R W Beard
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Takuma Yoshimura ◽  
Wataru Yamagami ◽  
Mio Takahashi ◽  
Takuro Hirano ◽  
Kensuke Sakai ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The significance of endometrial cytology in determining the therapeutic efficacy of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of endometrial cytology during MPA therapy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Overall, 77 patients who underwent dilatation and curettage (D&amp;C) to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MPA therapy at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of D&amp;C, cytological evaluation, and other clinicopathological factors were analyzed based on the patients’ medical records. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 61% and 92%, respectively, with D&amp;C being the gold standard for diagnosis in 142 D&amp;C/cytological examinations. Among patients with no residual disease on D&amp;C, 5 (4%) had suspicious or positive cytology. Although MPA therapy was terminated in 3 of these patients, only 1 patient had early recurrence, and the frequency of recurrence was similar to that of patients who showed negative results in both D&amp;C and cytology. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The sensitivity of endometrial cytology in determining the therapeutic effect of MPA therapy is low, and we confirmed that the omission of D&amp;C is unacceptable. Our findings also suggested that the addition of cytological evaluation to D&amp;C during MPA therapy had a low clinical significance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Haseeb Wani ◽  
Arshed Hussain Parry ◽  
Imza Feroz ◽  
Majid Jehangir ◽  
Masarat Rashid

Abstract Background Endometrial osseous metaplasia (EOM) is an uncommon condition characterised by metaplastic transformation of endometrial tissue into osteoblasts (mature or immature bone in the endometrium). Etiopathogenesis of EOM is explained by multiple putative mechanisms like dystrophic calcification, metaplastic ossification, retained foetal bones after abortions and genito-urinary tuberculosis. EOM has varied clinical presentation ranging from patient being asymptomatic to secondary infertility. Although hysteroscopy is the gold standard for its diagnosis and treatment, non-invasive imaging comprising chiefly of ultrasonography (USG) is increasingly becoming the mainstay of diagnosis. We aim to present the imaging findings in EOM to acquaint radiologists and gynaecologists with this condition to avert misdiagnosis of this uncommon yet treatable cause of infertility. Results Mean age of patients was 31.4 ± 5.4 (S.D) years. USG revealed linear or tubular densely echogenic endometrium with posterior acoustic shadowing in all the 14 patients. MRI in 3 patients revealed diffuse or patchy areas of T1W and T2W hypointense signal intensity with unilateral (n = 2) and bilateral (n = 1) ovarian cysts. One patient who underwent CT scan revealed dense endometrial calcification. Histopathologic examination (HPE) revealed lamellar (n = 6) or trabecular (n = 4) bone within endometrium (EOM) and inflammatory cells with calcification in four patients (calcific endometritis). Twelve patients conceived after dilatation and curettage within 15 months. Conclusion Familiarity with the imaging appearances of EOM is indispensable to clinch this diagnosis and avert misdiagnosis of this rare but potentially treatable cause of infertility. USG is usually sufficient for diagnosis. MRI and CT are only supplementary tools in difficult clinical scenarios.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
B Parajuli ◽  
G Pun ◽  
S Ranabhat ◽  
S Poudel

Objective: To study the spectrum of histopathological diagnosis of endometrial lesions and their distribution according to age. Methods: All the endometrium samples obtained by the procedure of dilatation and curettage and hysterectomy sent for histopathological examination at Pathology Department of Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. The study duration was total 12 months ranging from July 2016 to June 2017. All the endometrial samples were processed, sectioned at 4 - 6 μm and stained with routine H & E stain. Patient’s data including age, sex, procedure of the biopsy taken and histopathological diagnosis were noted. A pathologist, using Olympus microscope, reported the slides. Cases were reviewed by a second pathologist whenever necessary. Results: A total of 128 cases were studied. The most common histopathological diagnosis was proliferative endometrium (28.9%) followed by disorder proliferative endometrium (15.65%). Most of the patients were in age group 36 - 45 years comprising 32.03%. Hydatidiform mole comprised of 7.03% and among Hydatidiform mole, partial mole was more common. Dilatation and curettage (82.8%) was the common procedure in compare to hysterectomy for the evaluation of endometrial lesions. Conclusions: In this study, we observed a variety of endometrial lesions. Most of them are benign; among benign, proliferative endometrium was the common histopathological diagnosis followed by disorder proliferative endometrium. Most common presenting age group was found to be at 36 - 45 years. In evaluation of hydatidiform mole, partial mole was more frequent in compare to complete mole. Conventional dilatation and curettage is the preferred method in developing countries with limited resource to screen endometrial lesion and therefore biopsy should be sent for histopathological examination. Thus histopathological examination of routinely stained hematoxylin and eosin is readily available and widely accepted standard technique for evaluation of the endometrial lesions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aykut Barut ◽  
Figen Barut ◽  
Ilker Arikan ◽  
Muge Harma ◽  
Mehmet Ibrahim Harma ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-138
Author(s):  
Fergus P. McCarthy ◽  
Ali S. Khashan ◽  
Robyn A. North ◽  
Muna B. Rahma ◽  
James J. Walker ◽  
...  

Cytopathology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Munakata ◽  
S. Sasaki ◽  
M. Takase ◽  
R. Okatake ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
F. Leone ◽  
C. Marciante ◽  
A. Crepaldi ◽  
F. Pagano ◽  
M. Antonacci ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document