Abnormal liver function tests in pregnancy

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 347 (oct25 2) ◽  
pp. f6055-f6055 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Walker ◽  
L. C. Chappell ◽  
C. Williamson
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S76
Author(s):  
Dattatray Solanke ◽  
Meghraj Ingle ◽  
Aniruddha Phadke ◽  
Prabha Sawant

Author(s):  
Sumangali P. K. ◽  
Simi Kurian

Background: Abnormal liver function tests in pregnancy require proper evaluation and diagnosis. The underlying disorder can have a significant effect on the outcome of both mother and fetus. The present study was done with the objective to study the clinical profile, incidence and possible causes of derangements of liver function tests.Methods: The pregnant women with abnormal liver function were studied prospectively. All the liver function tests values were studied along with other required tests to identify the cause. The fetal and maternal outcome were also noted.Results: The incidence of abnormal liver function tests was 6.7%. Among these 96% were due to pregnancy specific liver dysfunction mainly due to hypertensive disorders. The mean value of bilirubin was more in infective hepatitis. There were 4 cases of intra uterine deaths and no maternal death.Conclusions: Pregnancy specific disorders are the major cause of abnormal liver function tests in pregnancy especially in the third trimester.


Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
BJ Egan ◽  
S Sarwar ◽  
M Anwar ◽  
C O'Morain ◽  
B Ryan

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1730
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Miyama ◽  
Yasuyuki Shiraishi ◽  
Shun Kohsaka ◽  
Ayumi Goda ◽  
Yosuke Nishihata ◽  
...  

Abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) are known to be associated with impaired clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, this implication varies with each single LFT panel. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of acute HF (AHF) patients by assessing multiple LFT panels in combination. From a prospective multicenter registry in Japan, 1158 AHF patients who were successfully discharged were analyzed (mean age, 73.9 ± 13.5 years; men, 58%). LFTs (i.e., total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase) at discharge were assessed; borderline and abnormal LFTs were defined as 1 and ≥2 parameter values above the normal range, respectively. The primary endpoint was composite of all-cause death or HF readmission. At the time of discharge, 28.7% and 8.6% of patients showed borderline and abnormal LFTs, respectively. There were 196 (16.9%) deaths and 298 (25.7%) HF readmissions during a median 12.4-month follow-up period. The abnormal LFTs group had a significantly higher risk of experiencing the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.08–2.12, p = 0.017), whereas the borderline LFTs group was not associated with higher risk of adverse events when referenced to the normal LFTs group. Among AHF patients, the combined elevation of ≥2 LFT panels at discharge was associated with long-term adverse outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 1090-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni Jäntti ◽  
Tuukka Tarvasmäki ◽  
Veli-Pekka Harjola ◽  
John Parissis ◽  
Kari Pulkki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document