scholarly journals Assessing vaccine introduction and uptake timelines in Gavi-supported countries: are introduction timelines accelerating across vaccine delivery platforms?

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e005032
Author(s):  
Karuna Luthra ◽  
Anna Zimmermann Jin ◽  
Prarthana Vasudevan ◽  
Karen Kirk ◽  
Carol Marzetta ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrevious studies identified factors influencing regulatory approval to introduction timelines for individual vaccines. However, introduction and uptake timelines have not been comprehensively assessed across the portfolio of Gavi-supported vaccines.MethodsWe analysed median times between introduction milestones from vaccine licensure to country introduction and uptake across six vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), three delivery platforms and 69 Gavi-supported countries. Data were gathered from public, partner and manufacturer records. VPDs and prequalified vaccines analysed included Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwP-HepB-Hib, pentavalent), pneumococcal disease (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV), rotavirus diarrhoea (rotavirus vaccine, RVV), cervical cancer (human papillomavirus vaccine, HPV), polio (inactivated polio vaccine, IPV) and meningococcal meningitis (meningococcal group A conjugate vaccine, MenA).ResultsMedian time from first vaccine licensure to first Gavi-supported country introduction across VPDs at a ‘global level’ (Gavi-supported countries) was 5.4 years. Once licensed, MenA vaccines reached first introduction fastest (campaign=0.6 years; routine immunisation (RI)=1.7 years). Most introductions were delayed. Country uptake following first introduction was accelerated for more recently Gavi-supported RI vaccines compared with older ones.ConclusionFactors accelerating timelines across delivery platforms included rapid product prequalifications by WHO, strong initial recommendations by the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization, achieving target product profiles on first vaccine licensure within a VPD and completing several VPD milestones at a global level prior to licensure. Milestones required for introduction in Gavi-supported countries should start prior or in parallel to licensure to accelerate uptake of vaccines delivered through diverse delivery platforms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean T O’Leary ◽  
Yvonne A Maldonado ◽  
David W Kimberlin

Abstract The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of medical and public health experts, meets 3 times per year to develop recommendations for vaccine use in the United States. The group usually has 15 voting members, each of whom is appointed to a 4-year term. ACIP members and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staff discuss the epidemiology of vaccine-preventable diseases and vaccine research, effectiveness, safety data, and clinical trial results. Representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics (Y. A. M. and D. W. K.) and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (S. T. O.) are present as liaisons to the ACIP. The ACIP met February 27 to 28, 2019, to discuss hepatitis A (HepA) vaccination of human immunodeficiency virus–infected persons, pneumococcal vaccination among adults aged 65 years or older, influenza vaccine effectiveness and safety, anthrax vaccination in the setting of a mass exposure, human papillomavirus vaccine, zoster vaccines, and Japanese encephalitis vaccine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila A. Haidari ◽  
Shawn T. Brown ◽  
Dagna Constenla ◽  
Eli Zenkov ◽  
Marie Ferguson ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. F139-F148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri E. Markowitz ◽  
Vivien Tsu ◽  
Shelley L. Deeks ◽  
Heather Cubie ◽  
Susan A. Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document