scholarly journals Doctors' perspectives on PSA testing illuminate established differences in prostate cancer screening rates between Australia and the UK: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. e011932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Pickles ◽  
Stacy M Carter ◽  
Lucie Rychetnik ◽  
Vikki A Entwistle
AAOHN Journal ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 379-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Snyder ◽  
Peggy N. Schrammel ◽  
Claudia B. Griffiths ◽  
Robert I. Griffiths

Recognition of the mortality and morbidity associated with prostate cancer has resulted in employer based screening programs. This retrospective cohort study identified the employer costs of prostate cancer screening and referrals due to abnormal test results. The subjects were 385 men enrolled in a workplace screening program at a single employer between 1993 and 1995. Screening consisted of digital rectal examination (DRE) annually for enrolled employees aged 40 years and older, plus annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for those 50 and older, and those 40 and older and considered at high risk. Data related to the health care and lost productivity costs of screening and referrals for abnormal test results were collected and analyzed. The total cost of screening was $44,355, or approximately $56 per screening encounter (788 DREs; 437 PSAs). Abnormal screening tests resulted in 52 referrals. Upon further evaluation, 42% were found to have an enlargement, 29% a node, and 12% benign prostatic hyperplasia. Only one malignancy was found. The total cost of additional referrals was $31,815, or 42% of the cost of screening plus referrals. As the cost per screening encounter was low, prostate cancer screening in the workplace is an efficient alternative.


2011 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 520-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Zeliadt ◽  
R. M. Hoffman ◽  
R. Etzioni ◽  
J. L. Gore ◽  
L. G. Kessler ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
S. L. Chang ◽  
J. C. Presti ◽  
J. P. Richie

188 Background: The AUA and American Cancer Society both recommend a shared decision-making process between clinicians and patients for prostate cancer screening with PSA testing. Data are limited data regarding patient preferences for PSA evaluation in the United States. We assessed the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of men who proceeded with or opted out of PSA testing in a nationally representative population-based cohort. Methods: We analyzed male participants from the 2001 to 2008 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who were 40 years old or older without a history of prostate cancer, recent prostate manipulation, or hormone therapy use (n = 6,032). All men underwent or refused PSA testing after a standardized explanation about prostate cancer screening by a physician. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted after adjusting for survey weights to identify independent sociodemographic and clinical predictors for opting out of PSA testing. Results: Overall, 5% of the study cohort refused PSA testing. The analysis revealed predictors for refusing PSA testing (Table). PSA testing preference was not influenced by a family history of prostate cancer, previous prostate cancer screening, education level, socioeconomic status, insurance status, or tobacco history. There were no significant time trends for PSA testing. Conclusions: Despite equal access to PSA testing in our study, there was unequal utilization. We found that Black men were more likely to refuse PSA testing. Our analysis also suggests that a perception of suboptimal health or uncertain future outlook may discourage men from undergoing PSA evaluation. These patient preferences for PSA evaluation should be factored into the shared decision-making process for prostate cancer screening. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e0153299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Pickles ◽  
Stacy M. Carter ◽  
Lucie Rychetnik ◽  
Kirsten McCaffery ◽  
Vikki A. Entwistle

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn L. Hooper ◽  
Rebecca S. Allen ◽  
Pamela Payne-Foster ◽  
JoAnn S. Oliver

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanita Hughes Halbert ◽  
Sebastiano Gattoni-Celli ◽  
Stephen Savage ◽  
Sandip M. Prasad ◽  
Rick Kittles ◽  
...  

Since prostate cancer continues to disproportionately affect African American men in terms of incidence, morbidity, and mortality, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening plays an important role in early detection, especially when men engage in informed decision making to accept or decline this test. The authors evaluated utilization of PSA testing among African American men based on factors that are important components of making informed decisions. Utilization of PSA testing was evaluated based on whether men had ever had PSA testing and PSA testing during the past year in a community-based sample of African American men ages 50 to 75 ( n = 132). Overall, 64% of men ( n = 85) reported that they had ever had a PSA test; the mean ( SD) age for first use of PSA testing was 47.7 ( SD = 7.4). The likelihood of ever having a PSA test increased significantly with physician communication (odds ratio [OR] = 14.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.20, 48.10; p = .0001) and with having an annual household income that was greater than $20,000 (OR = 9.80; 95% CI = 3.15, 30.51; p = .0001). The odds of ever having a PSA test were also decreased with each unit increase in future temporal orientation (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.47, 0.93; p = .02). Of the men who had ever had PSA testing, 57% were screened during the past year. Only health insurance status had a significant independent association with having annual PSA testing (OR = 5.10; 95% CI = 1.67, 15.60; p = .004). Different factors were associated significantly with ever having PSA testing and annual testing among African American men. African American men may not be making an informed decision about prostate cancer screening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
James T. Kearns ◽  
Oluwaseun Adeyemi ◽  
William E. Anderson ◽  
Timothy C. Hetherington ◽  
Yhenneko J. Taylor ◽  
...  

308 Background: The USPSTF prostate cancer screening guidelines have changed significantly in the past decade, from a recommendation of do not screen in 2012 to a 2018 recommendation that focuses on shared decision making. Additionally, most guidelines further acknowledge that African American men should be screened more intensively than Caucasian men due to increased incidence of prostate cancer and increased prostate cancer mortality. Our objective was to characterize racial disparities in PSA screening in a large healthcare system with a diverse patient population to understand contemporary trends. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Atrium Health Enterprise Data Warehouse, which includes clinical records from over 900 care locations across North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Participants included all men ≥ 40 years seen in the ambulatory or outpatient setting during 2014-2018. PSA testing was determined through laboratory data. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Between-group comparisons were conducted using generalized estimating equations models to account for within-subject correlation. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: There were 582,846 individual men seen from 2014-2018, including 416,843 Caucasians (71.5%) and 85,773 African Americans (14.7%). Screening rates declined among all groups from 2014-2018 (see table). African American men were screened at a similar or lower rate than Caucasian men in each year (from 18.6% vs 19.0% in 2014 to 11.9% vs 12.2% in 2018, respectively). Conclusions: PSA screening declined significantly between 2014 and 2018. African American men screened at a similar or lower rate than Caucasian men each year. Given the consensus that African American men should be more intensively screened for prostate cancer, significant racial disparities remain in prostate cancer screening. Further study is warranted to understand patient, provider, and system factors that contribute to disparities in prostate cancer care and outcomes.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document