scholarly journals Nurse-led patient-centred intervention to increase written advance directives for outpatients in early-stage palliative care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an embedded explanatory qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037144
Author(s):  
Katia Iglesias ◽  
Catherine Busnel ◽  
Florian Dufour ◽  
Sophie Pautex ◽  
Laurence Séchaud
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionDiscussing the evolution of life-threatening diseases and end-of-life issues remains difficult for patients, relatives and professionals. Helping people discuss and formalise their preferences in end-of-life care, as planned in the Go Wish intervention, could reduce health-related anxiety in the advance care planning (ACP) and advance directive (AD) process. The aims of this study are (1) to test the effectiveness of the Go Wish intervention among outpatients in early-stage palliative care and (2) to understand the role of defence mechanisms in end-of-life discussions among nurses, patients and relatives.Methods and analysisA mixed-methods study will be performed. A cluster randomised controlled trials with three parallel arms will be conducted with 45 patients with chronic progressive diseases impacting life expectancy in each group: (1) Group A, Go Wish intervention for patients and their relatives; (2) Group A, Go Wish intervention for patients alone and (3) Group B, for patients (with a waiting list), who will receive the standardised information on ADs (usual care). Randomisation will be at the nurse level as each patient is referred to one of the 20 participating nurses (convenience sample of 20 nurses). A qualitative study will be conducted to understand the cognitive and emotional processes and experiences of nurses, patients and relatives confronted with end-of-life discussions. The outcome measurements include the completion of ADs (yes/no), anxiety, quality of communication about end-of-life care, empowerment, quality of life and attitudes towards ADs.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland (no. 2019–00922). The findings will be disseminated to practice (nurses, patients and relatives), to national and international scientific conferences, and peer-reviewed journals covering nursing science, psychology and medicine.Trial registration numberNCT04065685.

Hospital end-of-life care: families’ free-text notes

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-00239
Author(s):  
Sandra Kurkowski ◽  
Johannes Radon ◽  
Annika R Vogt ◽  
Martin Weber ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Quality Aspects ◽  
Care Of The Dying

BackgroundPalliative care strives to improve quality of life for patients with incurable diseases. This approach includes adequate support of the patients’ loved ones. Consequently, loved ones have personal experiences of providing end-of-life care for their next. This is a resource for information and may help to investigate the loved ones’ perspectives on need for improvements.AimTo identify further quality aspects considered important by loved ones to improve the quality of care at the end of life as an addition to quantitative results from the Care of the Dying Evaluation for the German-speaking area (CODE-GER) questionnaire.DesignWithin the validation study of the questionnaire ‘Care of the Dying Evaluation’ (CODETM) GER, loved ones were asked to comment (free text) in parallel on each item of the CODE-GER. These free-text notes were analysed with the qualitative content analysis method by Philipp Mayring.Setting/participantsLoved ones of patients (n=237), who had died an expected death in two university hospitals (palliative and non-palliative care units) during the period from April 2016 to March 2017.Results993 relevant paragraphs were extracted out of 1261 free-text notes. For loved ones, important aspects of quality of care are information/communication, respect of the patient’s and/or loved one’s will, involvement in decision-making at the end of life (patient’s volition) and having the possibility to say goodbye.ConclusionsIt is important for loved ones to be taken seriously in their sorrows, to be informed, that the caregivers respect the patients’ will and to be emotionally supported.Trial registration numberThis study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013916).

Cultural Issues in Palliative Care

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Yennurajalingam
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cultural Issues ◽  
Medical Interpreter ◽  
Improve Patient

Culture play a significant role in the care of patients receiving Palliative care. Understanding and managing cultural differences in end-of-life care is important as misunderstanding can result in under-treatment and unnecessary suffering for the patient and their care providers. Therefore better understanding can improve patient–physician communication and potentially improve patients’ quality of life, coping, and facilitate patients to make informed decisions and set appropriate priorities with regard to treatment and end-of-life care. This chapter discusses key cultural issues in palliative care, including the concepts of nondisclosure, the importance of the use of a medical interpreter, and the importance of an interdisciplinary team.

scholarly journals Information sharing challenges in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of patient, family and professional perspectives on the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e037483
Author(s):  
Holly Standing ◽  
Rebecca Patterson ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Sonia Michelle Dalkin ◽  
Monique Lhussier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Information Sharing ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Health And Social Care

ObjectivesTo explore current challenges in interdisciplinary management of end-of-life care in the community and the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System (EPaCCS) to facilitate the delivery of care that meets patient preferences.DesignQualitative study using interviews and focus groups.SettingHealth and Social Care Services in the North of England.Participants71 participants, 62 health and social care professionals, 9 patients and family members.ResultsFour key themes were identified: information sharing challenges; information sharing systems; perceived benefits of an EPaCCS and barriers to use and requirements for an EPaCCS. Challenges in sharing information were a source of frustration for health and social care professionals as well as patients, and were suggested to result in inappropriate hospital admissions. Current systems were perceived by participants to not work well—paper advance care planning (ACP) documentation was often unavailable or inaccessible, meaning it could not be used to inform decision-making at the point of care. Participants acknowledged the benefits of an EPaCCS to facilitate information sharing; however, they also raised concerns about confidentiality, and availability of the increased time and resources required to access and maintain such a system.ConclusionsEPaCCS offer a potential solution to information sharing challenges in end-of-life care. However, our findings suggest that there are issues in the initiation and documentation of end-of-life discussions that must be addressed through investment in training in order to ensure that there is sufficient information regarding ACP to populate the system. There is a need for further qualitative research evaluating use of an EPaCCS, which explores benefits and challenges, uptake and reasons for disparities in use to better understand the potential utility and implications of such systems.

scholarly journals ‘. . . and then no more kisses!’ Exploring patients’ experiences on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms and hygiene measures in end-of-life care A mixed-methods study

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Heckel ◽  
Alexander Sturm ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
Christoph Ostgathe ◽  
Franziska A Herbst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Hygiene Measures ◽  
Patients Wishes

Background: In end-of-life care hygiene, measures concerning multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms may contradict the palliative care approach of social inclusion and be burdensome for patients. Objectives: To integrate patients’ perspectives on handling multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms at their end of life, their quality of life, the impact of positive multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis, protection and isolation measures on their well-being and patients’ wishes and needs regarding their care. Design: A mixed-methods convergent parallel design embedded quantitative data on the patients’ multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ trajectory and quality of life assessed by the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life in qualitative data collection via interviews and focus groups. Data analysis was performed according to Grounded Theory and qualitative and quantitative results were interrelated. Setting/participants: Between March 2014 and September 2015 at two hospitals adult patients diagnosed with multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms and treated in a palliative care department or a geriatric ward were included in the sample group. Results: Patients in end-of-life and geriatric care reported emotional and social impact through multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis itself, hygiene measures and lack of information. This impact affects aspects relevant to the patients’ quality of life. Patients’ wishes for comprehensive communication/information and reduction of social strain were identified from the focus group discussion. Conclusion: Patients would benefit from comprehensible information on multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms. Strategies minimizing social exclusion and emotional impact of multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ diagnosis in end-of-life care are needed as well as adaption or supplementation of standard multidrug-resistant bacterial microorganisms’ policies of hospitals.

Early palliative care is associated with improved quality of end-of-life care for women with high risk gynecologic malignancies

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
N.S. Nevadunsky ◽  
C. Zanartu ◽  
P. Pinto ◽  
R. Barrera ◽  
A.R. Van Arsdale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Gynecologic Malignancies ◽  
Early Palliative Care

scholarly journals Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end-of-life care in cancer patients

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (11) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Sun Hyun Kim ◽  
Joyce Roquemore ◽  
Rony Dev ◽  
Gary Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care

23 Findings from a pilot and feasibility trial of a music therapy intervention in specialist palliative care

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 368.2-368
Author(s):  
Lisa Graham-Wisener ◽  
Joanne Reid ◽  
Tracy McConnell ◽  
Kerry McGrillen ◽  
Jenny Kirkwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Music Therapy ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Attrition Rates ◽  
Therapy Intervention

IntroductionMusic therapy aligns to the holistic approach to palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) with increased prevalence in PEOLC settings (Graham-Wisener et al. 2018). Despite this there is a dearth of high-quality evidence examining the impact of music therapy towards end of life on quality of life (McConnell et al. 2016).AimsThe aim of this pilot and feasibility study was to: test procedures; outcomes and validated tools; estimate recruitment and attrition rates; and calculate the sample size required for a phase III randomised controlled trial.MethodsA single-centre pilot and feasibility trial with patients admitted to a specialist palliative care inpatient unit within the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised (1:1) to either a music therapy intervention of two 30–45 min sessions of music therapy per week for three consecutive weeks or usual care. The primary outcome measure was to evaualte the feasibility of administering the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL) baseline with follow-up measures at one, three and five weeks.Results51 participants were recruited to the trial over a 12 month period. Feasibility of administering music therapy intervention and attrition rates identified one-week follow-up as an appropriate primary outcome. Results suggest a likely effect on MQoL total score between intervention and control arms in particular the existential subscale.ConclusionThe current study resolved a number of issues towards informing robust procedures for a phase III RCT. This data is urgently needed to ensure an evidence-based decision on inclusion of music therapy in palliative care services.References. Graham-Wisener L, Watts G, Kirkwood J, Harrison C, McEwan J, Porter S, Reid J, McConnell TH. Music therapy in UK palliative and end-of-life care: A service evaluation. BMJ supportive & palliative care2018.. McConnell T, Scott D, Porter S. Music therapy for end-of-life care: An updated systematic review. Palliative Medicine2016;30(9):877–883.

scholarly journals Do Palliative Care Teams in Nursing Homes Improve the Quality of End-of-Life Care for Nursing Home Residents?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Temkin-Greener Helena Temkin-Greener ◽  
Dana Mukamel ◽  
Susan Ladwig ◽  
Thomas , Caprio ◽  
Sally Norton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

J-HOPE study: Evaluation of end-of-life cancer care in Japan from the perspective of bereaved family members

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9577-9577
Author(s):  
M. Miyashita ◽  
T. Morita ◽  
K. Sato ◽  
S. Tsuneto ◽  
Y. Shima
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Bereaved Family ◽  
Care Evaluation

9577 Background: The Japan Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (J-HOPE) study was conducted in 2007 and 2008. The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of end-of-life care at regional cancer centers (CCs), inpatient palliative care units (PCUs), and home hospices (HHs) in Japan from the perspective of bereaved family members. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional mail survey was conducted in 2007 and 2008. The survey was sent to bereaved families 6–18 months after the death of a patient at 56 CCs, 100 PCUs, or 14 HHs. Outcome measures were the good death inventory, the care evaluation scale, and overall satisfaction with care. The protocol of this study was approved by the institutional review boards of each participating institution. Results: Of the 13,181 bereaved family members that received the survey, 8,163 (62%) participants returned their responses. Among bereaved family members, significantly fewer responded that patients were free from physical distress at CCs (50%) than PCUs (80%) and HHs (73%) (P<0.0001). Significantly fewer patients trusted the physicians at CCs (79%) when compared with PCUs (83%) and HHs (88%) (P<0.0001). Significantly fewer patients were valued as people at CCs (83%) than PCUs (93%) and HHs (95%) (P<0.0001). In addition, significantly fewer participants felt physicians should have worked to improve the patients' symptoms more quickly at CCs (55%) when compared with PCUs (78%) and HHs (77%) (P<0.0001). Significantly fewer participants felt nurse should improve their knowledge and skills regarding end-of-life care at CCs (51%) when compared with PCUs (76%) and HHs (78%) (P<0.0001). A total of 51% of participants reported that nurses should improve their knowledge and skills regarding end-of-life care. Finally, significantly fewer participants were satisfied with the end-of-life care provided by CCs (80%) when compared with PCUs (93%) and HHs (94%) (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Overall, the bereaved family members appreciated the end-of-life care provided by CCs, PCUs, and HHs in Japan. However, in some situations, the quality of end-of-life care provided by CCs was lower than that provided by PCUs and HHs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

ICU utilization among oncology patients at the end of life.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hong ◽  
Christine Kurian ◽  
Jared Minetola ◽  
Valerie Pracilio Csik ◽  
Adam Binder
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Code Status ◽  
Care Plans

118 Background: Patients with advanced cancer have high rates of hospitalizations as a result of their oncologic care. Furthermore, these patients receive aggressive end of life care despite evidence that aggressive end of life care does not improves quality of life or outcomes for patients and is associated with worse bereavement adjustment for caregivers. The American Society of Clinical Oncology has endorsed several indicators of aggressive end of life care, but most striking is intensive care unit (ICU) admission within 30 days before death. Methods: Adult oncology patients who died within 30 days of hospitalization and/or admitted to the ICU from 10/2018-3/2019 at an academic medical center were evaluated. The cohort was identified using ICD-10 codes, EMR systems support, and manual chart review. Patient demographic data, cancer type, stage, line of therapy, code status, advanced care plan, prior admissions as well as other clinical characteristics were collected. Results: In total, 180 patients were included for analysis; 106 of which were admitted to the ICU. Of patients admitted to the ICU, 58 patients died (54.7%). Mean ECOG performance status was 1.24. Average number of admissions 3 and 6 months prior to death was 0.71 and 1.26. Thirty six percent of patients were on first or second-line chemotherapy. 41.37% of patients who died in the ICU had prolonged length of stay (>1 week). Only 34.48% were known to palliative care prior to admission and 12.06% of patients had advanced care plans in place at time of hospitalization. Palliative care was consulted on 32.75% of patients who died in the ICU. Ninety Three percent had their code status changed prior to death. Conclusions: Despite established recommendations to support otherwise, at our institution there continues to be high utilization of ICU care near the end of life. Previous admissions and ECOG status are poor predictors of death in this cohort. The majority of patients had relapsed and refractory disease. There was a low rate of advanced care planning or palliative care involvement prior to the patient’s hospitalization. Further interventions are underway to improve end of life planning in order to improve our quality of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document