scholarly journals Improving intraoperative administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a quality improvement report

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e001042
Author(s):  
Victoria Haney ◽  
Stephan Maman ◽  
Jansie Prozesky ◽  
Dmitri Bezinover ◽  
Kunal Karamchandani
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Care Improvement

Despite widespread adoption of the Surgical Care Improvement Programme, the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) remains high. It is possible that lapses in appropriate administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis may play a role. We noted significant discordance with national guidelines with regards to intraoperative antibiotic administration at our institution, leading to implementation of a quality improvement initiative using multidisciplinary education and reminder-based interventions to improve prescribing practices and increase compliance with national guidelines. We observed a significant improvement in adherence to all aspects of antibiotic administration guidelines as a result of such interventions. Targeted multidisciplinary interventions may help improve prescribing practices of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and provide an opportunity to potentially decrease the burden of SSI and the related morbidity and mortality.

Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: “checking-the-box” is not enough

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 470-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Karamchandani ◽  
Kyle Barden ◽  
Jansie Prozesky
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administration practices in a small cohort and assess compliance with national guidelines.Design/methodology/approachPatients that developed surgical site infections (SSI) in a tertiary care academic medical center over a two-year period were identified. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for compliance with national guidelines with respect to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.FindingsOver a two-year period, 283 SSI patients were identified. An appropriate antibiotic was chosen in 80 percent, an appropriate dose was administered in 45 percent and timing complied in 89 percent. The antibiotics were appropriately re-dosed in only 9.2 percent in whom the requirement was met. The prescribing guidelines were adhered to in entirety in only 54 patients (23.8 percent).Practical implicationsTimely and appropriate antibiotic administration prior to surgery is essential to prevent SSI. Proper diligence is required to accomplish this task effectively.Originality/valueBased on the findings, it appears that merely, “checking a box” for antibiotic administration during surgery is not enough, and a multidisciplinary approach should be followed to ensure “appropriate” antibiotic administration.

A quality improvement initiative to optimize dosing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 702-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Caruso ◽  
Ellen Wang ◽  
Hayden T. Schwenk ◽  
David Scheinker ◽  
Calida Yeverino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

scholarly journals 1096. Reducing Unnecessary Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S389-S390
Author(s):  
Talene A Metjian ◽  
Jeffrey Gerber ◽  
Adam Watson ◽  
Caroline Burlingame ◽  
Heuer Gregory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Tethered Cord ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background National guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) recommend against antibiotic prophylaxis following wound closure for clean and clean-contaminated surgical procedures. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis can lead to antibiotic resistance and adverse drug events without reducing SSI rates. The objective was to reduce the rate of antibiotic prophylaxis following surgical incision closure for specified procedures in the Divisions of Neurosurgery (NRS), Otolaryngology (OTO), and General Surgery (GS) at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). Methods We identified all NRS, OTO, and GS procedures conducted at CHOP from July 1, 2016 to June 20, 2017. Collaborative meetings between surgical quality improvement team leads and the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) were convened to identify procedures most suitable for the intervention, including Chiari decompressions and tethered cord repair (NRS); tympanoplasty and tracheostomy (OTO); and laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures (GS). The intervention, started in March 2018, included (1) education of surgeons on perioperative prescribing guidelines, (2) order set modification, and (3) individualized monthly audit with feedback reports of inappropriate postoperative prescribing (via email copying all surgeons within the division). We monitored rates utilizing SPC charts of postoperative antibiotic use (defined as administration within 24 hours of procedure end) and evaluated SSI rates pre and post-intervention with a Poisson regression. Results Following the intervention, postoperative antibiotic use reached special cause resulting in a mean decline for laparoscopy (19.6% to 11.7%), thoracoscopy (35.6% to 17.9%), tympanoplasty (90.5% to 11.4%), tethered cord repair (95% to 25.5%), and Chiari decompression (97% to 45.9%). There was no mean shift in postoperative antibiotic use for tracheostomy (25.5%). 30-day SSI rates did not change pre- and post-intervention (P = 0.36). Conclusion A quality improvement initiative conducted to implement national guidelines recommending against postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis showed a significant reduction in postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis without a concomitant rise in SSI rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Reduction in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Expenditure and the Rate of Surgical Site Infection by Means of a Protocol That Controls the Use of Prophylaxis

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa I. Gómez ◽  
Silvia I. Acosta-Gnass ◽  
Luisa Mosqueda-Barboza ◽  
Juan A Basualdo
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Final Stage ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

Objective.To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on training and the use of a protocol with an automatic stop of antimicrobial prophylaxis to improve hospital compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.Design.An interventional study with a before-after trial was conducted in 3 stages: a 3-year initial stage (January 1999 to December 2001), during which a descriptive-prospective survey was performed to evaluate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections; a 6-month second stage (January to June 2002), during which an educational intervention was performed regarding the routine use of a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis request form that included an automatic stop of prophylaxis (the “automatic-stop prophylaxis form”); and a 3-year final stage (July 2002 to June 2005), during which a descriptive-prospective survey of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infections was again performed.Setting.An 88-bed teaching hospital in Entre Ríos, Argentina.Patients.A total of 3,496 patients who underwent surgery were included in the first stage of the study and 3,982 were included in the final stage.Results.Comparison of the first stage of the study with the final stage revealed that antimicrobial prophylaxis was given at the appropriate time to 55% and 88% of patients, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.25-0.30]; P < .01); the antimicrobial regimen was adequate in 74% and 87% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45-0.55]; P < .01); duration of the prophylaxis was adequate in 44% and 55% of patients, respectively (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.77-0.84]; P < .01); and the surgical site infection rates were 3.2% and 1.9%, respectively (RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < .01). Antimicrobial expenditure was US$10,678.66 per 1,000 patient-days during the first stage and US$7,686.05 per 1,000 patient-days during the final stage (RR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.86-0.89]; P<.01).Conclusion.The intervention based on training and application of a protocol with an automatic stop of prophylaxis favored compliance with the hospital's current surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines before the intervention, achieving significant reductions of surgical site infection rates and substantial savings for the healthcare system.

66 - Impact of Postoperative Neurosurgery Order Sets on Glycemic Control and Surgical Site Infections: A Quality-Improvement Initiative

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. S26
Author(s):  
Dena Sommer ◽  
Barbara Mcarthur ◽  
Mahsa Sadeghi ◽  
Mary Rozmanc ◽  
Avery Nathens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Order Sets

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of ertapenem in preventing SSIs after elective colorectal surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Vicentini ◽  
A Corradi ◽  
S Corcione ◽  
F G De Rosa ◽  
C M Zotti
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Resistant Isolate ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Reported Data

Abstract Background The efficacy of standard surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) regimens in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery is declining, along with rising rates of intestinal colonization with antimicrobial resistant (AMR) Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides spp. Ertapenem has been approved by the FDA and EMA for SAP in this context, however it has not been used extensively for this indication out of concern for increasing carbapenem-resistance rates. A limited number of studies have investigated the efficacy of ertapenem in preventing SSIs after colorectal surgery, comparing ertapenem with different agents or combinations of agents. Methods A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies measuring the efficacy of ertapenem in preventing SSIs following elective colorectal procedures. Studies were considered eligible if they reported extractable data on the proportion of SSIs and/or on the proportion of AMR pathogens isolated from SSIs. Data from all ertapenem study arms were extracted. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall proportion of SSI. Results Of 1109 identified studies, 5 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 3176 participants. The pooled proportion of SSI was 0.10 (95% CI 0.05-0.18; I2=96%; τ2=0.6323; p ≤ 0.01). Only one study reported data on carbapenem resistance: out of 124 isolates from 30 patients, 1 gram negative carbapenem-resistant isolate was identified. Conclusions The pooled proportion of SSI using ertapenem as SAP found in this study is in line with the proportion of SSI using standard SAP found by a recent meta-analysis (Gandra, 2019). According to this analysis, the benefit of ertapenem does not outweigh the risk of further promoting AMR, although results should be interpreted with caution due to the high heterogeneity among included studies. Key messages According to this study, the efficacy of ertapenem in preventing surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery is comparable to the efficacy of standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The emergence of carbapenem resistance after surgical prophylaxis with ertapenem should be further investigated through longer term studies before widespread use for this indication.

scholarly journals Assessment of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Patients with Surgical Site Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 560-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney J. Goede ◽  
Jenna K. Lovely ◽  
Rodney L. Thompson ◽  
Robert R. Cima
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Antibiotic Selection

Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of hospital-acquired infections and are associated with substantial health care costs, with increased morbidity and death. The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) contains standards that are nationally reported with the aim of improving patient outcomes after surgery. Our institution's standards for antimicrobial prophylaxis in the perioperative period are more stringent than these measures and may be considered “beyond SCIP.” The 4 elements of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis are timing, antibiotic selection, dosing, and intraoperative redosing. Objective To quantify antimicrobial SSI prophylaxis compliance in accordance with institutional standards and to identify potential opportunities for improvement. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older were included if they had an SSI between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010, according to the database maintained prospectively by the Infection Prevention and Control Unit. Adherence to our institution's practice standards was assessed through analysis of antibiotics administered—timing in relation to the incision, closure, and tourniquet inflation times for the procedure and antibiotic selection, dose, and redosing. Results Overall noncompliance with all 4 elements of antimicrobial prophylaxis was 75.4% among the 760 cases. Repeat dosing had the greatest noncompliance (45.1%); antibiotic selection had the lowest incidence of noncompliance (10.8%). Conclusions Noncompliance existed in each element of antimicrobial SSI prophylaxis, with antibiotic redosing leading in noncompliance. With the implementation of tools to assist the surgical team in following institutional standards, noncompliance will likely decline and additional research opportunities will exist.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document