Aspirin plus clopidogrel in acute minor ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack is superior to aspirin alone for stroke risk reduction: CHANCE trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip B Gorelick ◽  
Muhammad U Farooq
2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (05) ◽  
pp. 992-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Jia-xi Song ◽  
Qiu-shi Lv ◽  
Hao Pan ◽  
Chun-ni Zhang ◽  
...  

SummaryCirculating microRNAs (miRNAs) have recently emerged as promising biomarkers for ischaemic stroke (IS). However, the expression patterns of specific miRNAs in transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients have not been investigated. Their predictive values for the presence of IS and TIA and their relationships to the neurological deficit severity of IS and the subsequent stroke risk after TIA remain unclear exactly. In this study, 754 miRNAs were initially screened by the TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA) in two pooled serum samples from 50 IS patients and 50 controls. Markedly altered miRNAs were subsequently validated by individual quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) assays first in the same cohort of TLDA and further confirmed in another larger cohort including 177 IS, 81 TIA patients and 42 controls. Consequently, TLDA screening showed that 71 miRNAs were up-regulated and 49 miRNAs were down-regulated in IS patients. QRT-PCR validation confirmed that serum levels of miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-181a-5p and miR-21–5p were significantly increased in IS patients. Strikingly, serum levels of miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-181a-5p were also significantly elevated in TIA patients. Furthermore, up-regulated miR-23b-3p, miR-29b-3p and miR-21–5p could clearly differentiate between IS and TIA patients. Logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that these altered miRNAs may function as predictive and discriminative biomarkers for IS and TIA, and their distinctive expression signatures may contribute to assessing neurological deficit severity of IS and subsequent stroke risk after TIA.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.


2021 ◽  
pp. svn-2020-000471
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Junfeng Shi ◽  
Yuesong Pan ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Hongyi Yan ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe risk of disability and mortality is high among recurrent stroke, which highlights the importance of secondary prevention measures. We aim to evaluate medication persistence for secondary prevention and the prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in China.MethodsPatients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA from the China National Stroke Registry II were divided into 3 groups based on the percentage of persistence in secondary prevention medication classes from discharge to 3 months after onset (level I: persistence=0%, level II: 0%<persistence<100%, level III: persistence=100%). The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. The secondary outcomes included composite events (stroke, myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular cause), all-cause death and disability (modified Rankin Scale score=3–5) from 3 months to 1 year after onset. Recurrent stroke, composite events and all-cause death were performed using Cox regression model, and disability was identified through logistic regression model using the generalised estimating equation method.Results18 344 patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA were included, 315 (1.7%) of whom experienced recurrent strokes. Compared with level I, the adjusted HR of recurrent stroke for level II was 0.41 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.54) and level III 0.37 (0.28 to 0.48); composite events for level II 0.41 (0.32 to 0.53) and level III 0.38 (0.30 to 0.49); all-cause death for level II 0.28 (0.23 to 0.35) and level III 0.20 (0.16–0.24). Compared with level I, the adjusted OR of disability for level II was 0.89 (0.77 to 1.03) and level III 0.82 (0.72 to 0.93).ConclusionsPersistence in secondary prevention medications, especially in all classes of medications prescribed by the physician, was associated with lower hazard of recurrent stroke, composite events, all-cause death and lower odds of disability in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA.


BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n49
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J Perry ◽  
Marco L A Sivilotti ◽  
Marcel Émond ◽  
Ian G Stiell ◽  
Grant Stotts ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To validate the previously derived Canadian TIA Score to stratify subsequent stroke risk in a new cohort of emergency department patients with transient ischaemic attack. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting 13 Canadian emergency departments over five years. Participants 7607 consecutively enrolled adult patients attending the emergency department with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was subsequent stroke or carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. The secondary outcome was subsequent stroke within seven days (with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting). Telephone follow-up used the validated Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke Free Status at seven and 90 days. All outcomes were adjudicated by panels of three stroke experts, blinded to the index emergency department visit. Results Of the 7607 patients, 108 (1.4%) had a subsequent stroke within seven days, 83 (1.1%) had carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days, and nine had both. The Canadian TIA Score stratified the risk of stroke, carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, or both within seven days as low (risk ≤0.5%; interval likelihood ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.44), medium (risk 2.3%; interval likelihood ratio 0.94, 0.85 to 1.04), and high (risk 5.9% interval likelihood ratio 2.56, 2.02 to 3.25) more accurately (area under the curve 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.73) than did the ABCD2 (0.60, 0.55 to 0.64) or ABCD2i (0.64, 0.59 to 0.68). Results were similar for subsequent stroke regardless of carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting within seven days. Conclusion The Canadian TIA Score stratifies patients’ seven day risk for stroke, with or without carotid endarterectomy/carotid artery stenting, and is now ready for clinical use. Incorporating this validated risk estimate into management plans should improve early decision making at the index emergency visit regarding benefits of hospital admission, timing of investigations, and prioritisation of specialist referral.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet K Sluggett ◽  
Gillian E Caughey ◽  
Michael B Ward ◽  
Elizabeth E Roughead ◽  
Andrew L Gilbert

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-113
Author(s):  
Michael Valente ◽  
Shelton Leung ◽  
Philip Wu ◽  
Danielle H. Oh ◽  
Hyuen Tran ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii1-iii16
Author(s):  
John J McCabe ◽  
Eimear O'Reilly ◽  
Sarah Coveney ◽  
Ronan Collins ◽  
Simon Cronin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inflammation is thought to play an important role in atherosclerotic stroke mechanisms. There is growing interest in the prognostic role of inflammatory biomarkers as risk factors for recurrent vascular events, after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Elevated fibrinogen levels are independently-associated with the risk of first-ever stroke. However, the prognostic value of fibrinogen, after ischaemic cerebrovascular events is uncertain. Methods We searched EMBASE and Ovid Medline, from 1970-January 2019, for any study that measured Fibrinogen after stroke or TIA, and related it to the risk of recurrent stroke or recurrent vascular events. All records were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Any disagreements between authors regarding eligibility were resolved by consensus. Results We identified 2,520 publications, of which, 15 articles from 16 individual studies were eligible (11 observational cohorts, 3 cohort studies within randomized control trials, 2 case-control studies). The sample size for recurrent stroke and recurrent vascular events was 9,963 and 7,381 patients, in 11 and 10 studies, respectively. The time from event to phlebotomy was <7 days in 5, 7-90 days in 6, and >90 days in 5 studies, respectively. There was marked heterogeneity in statistical methodologies employed to examine the relationship between fibrinogen and outcomes, which did not allow valid meta-analysis (above/below specified threshold (n=4), differences in means/medians (n=5), risk per unit increase (n=1), per standard deviation (n=3), per quartile (n=1), per decile (n=1) or not specified (n=1)). 4 studies adjusted for all conventional vascular risk factors (age, smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia/statin use, and hypertension). 2 of 11 studies found a positive association with recurrent stroke. 5 of 10 studies found a positive association with recurrent vascular events. Conclusion The prognostic value of Fibrinogen after stroke or TIA remains unclear. Standardised methods and fully-adjusted multivariable analysis are needed in future prognostic studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document