Endosonography-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous cholecystostomy in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: an international randomised multicentre controlled superiority trial (DRAC 1)

Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1085-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Y B Teoh ◽  
Masayuki Kitano ◽  
Takao Itoi ◽  
Manuel Pérez-Miranda ◽  
Takeshi Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Gallbladder Drainage ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Very High

ObjectiveThe optimal management of acute cholecystitis in patients at very high risk for cholecystectomy is uncertain. The aim of the current study was to compare endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) to percutaneous cholecystostomy (PT-GBD) as a definitive treatment in these patients under a randomised controlled trial.DesignConsecutive patients suffering from acute calculous cholecystitis but were at very high-risk for cholecystectomy were recruited. The primary outcome was the 1-year adverse events rate. Secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success, 30-day adverse events, pain scores, unplanned readmissions, re-interventions and mortalities.ResultsBetween August 2014 to February 2018, 80 patients were recruited. EUS-GBD significantly reduced 1 year adverse events (10 (25.6%) vs 31 (77.5%), p<0.001), 30-day adverse events (5 (12.8%) vs 19 (47.5%), p=0.010), re-interventions after 30 days (1/39 (2.6%) vs 12/40 (30%), p=0.001), number of unplanned readmissions (6/39 (15.4%) vs 20/40 (50%), p=0.002) and recurrent cholecystitis (1/39 (2.6%) vs 8/40 (20%), p=0.029). Postprocedural pain scores and analgesic requirements were also less (p=0.034). The technical success (97.4% vs 100%, p=0.494), clinical success (92.3% vs 92.5%, p=1) and 30-day mortality (7.7% vs 10%, p=1) were statistically similar. The predictor to recurrent acute cholecystitis was the performance of PT-GBD (OR (95% CI)=5.63 (1.20–53.90), p=0.027).ConclusionEUS-GBD improved outcomes as compared to PT-GBD in those patients that not candidates for cholecystectomy. EUS-GBD should be the procedure of choice provided that the expertise is available after a multi-disciplinary meeting. Further studies are required to determine the long-term efficacy.Trial registration numberNCT02212717

scholarly journals Surgical outcome of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: Ten years’ experience at a tertiary care centre

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Szabolcs Ábrahám ◽  
Illés Tóth ◽  
Ria Benkő ◽  
Mária Matuz ◽  
Gabriella Kovács ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Gallbladder Drainage ◽  
Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Background Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) plays an important role in the treatment of elderly patients and/or patients in poor health with acute cholecystitis (AC). The primary aim of this study is to determine how these factors influence the clinical outcome of PTGBD. Moreover, we assessed the timing and results of subsequent cholecystectomies. Patients and Methods We retrospectively examined the results of 162 patients undergoing PTGBD between 2010 and 2020 (male–female ratio: 51.23% vs. 48.77%; mean age: 71.43 ± 13.22 years). Patient’s performance status and intervention outcomes were assessed with clinical success rates (CSR) and in-hospital mortality. The conversion rate (CR) of possible urgent or delayed, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) after PTGBD were analysed. Results PTGBD was the definitive treatment in 42.18% of patients, while it was a bridging therapy prior to cholecystectomy (CCY) for the other patients. CSR was 87.97%, it was only 64.29% in grade III AC. In 9.87% of the cases, urgent LC was necessary after PTGBD, and its conversion rate was approximately equal to that of elective LC (18.18 vs. 17.46%, respectively, p = 0.2217). Overall, the post-PTGBD in-hospital mortality was 11.72%, while the same figure was 0% for grade I AC, 7.41% for grade II and 40.91% for grade III. Based on logistic regression analyses, in-hospital mortality (OR 6.07; CI 1.79–20.56), clinical progression (OR 7.62; CI 2.64–22.05) and the need for emergency CCY (OR 14.75; CI 3.07–70.81) were mostly determined by AC severity grade. Conclusion PTGBD is an easy-to-perform intervention with promising clinical success rates in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. After PTGBD, the level of gallbladder inflammation played a decisive role in the course of AC. In a severe, grade III inflammation, we have to consider low CSR and high mortality.

scholarly journals Rescue gallbladder drainage in very high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis: Could COVID-19 patients be best suited for the EUS-guided approach?

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1014
Author(s):  
Roberto Di Mitri ◽  
Filippo Mocciaro ◽  
Michele Amata ◽  
Ambra Bonaccorso ◽  
Elisabetta Conte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Gallbladder Drainage ◽  
Very High

Is Percutaneous Cholecystostomy a Good Alternative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients?

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Papis ◽  
Eiman Khalifa ◽  
Ricky Bhogal ◽  
Amit Nair ◽  
Saboor Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Record System ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis but the management of high-risk surgical patients is a difficult dilemma. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) could represent a safer and less invasive option. The aim of the study was to assess the outcomes of PC in high-risk patients. This is a retrospective single-center study; data were collected from our hospital electronic record system. From February 2009 to March 2014, there were 753 patients admitted with acute cholecystitis. Of these 39 were considered high risk for surgery and underwent PC during their hospital stay. The radiological approach was transperitoneal in 29 patients and transhepatic in 10 patients. Median follow-up was 19 months. There were 27 males (69.2%) and 12 females (30.8%) with a mean age of 72 years (range 41–90 years). Twenty-seven patients had PC as definitive treatment (group A) and 12 patients as a bridge to cholecystectomy (group B). There were no postprocedure complications. Five patients in group A were readmitted once with another episode of cholecystitis after PC (18.5%), one patient in group B was readmitted with cholecystitis after two years before proceeding to cholecystectomy, and two patients were readmitted after cholecystectomy (16.6%) for intra-abdominal collections treated with percutaneous radiological drainage. Seven patients died (17.9%) as a result of severe biliary sepsis during their index hospital admission. PC is a safe approach in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and can provide satisfactory long-term results when cholecystectomy is not a viable option.

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy is a Definitive Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly High-risk Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Li ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Wu Ji ◽  
Zhufu Quan ◽  
Xinbo Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an alternative treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC) in elderly patients with high surgical risk and has lower morbidity and mortality than emergency cholecystectomy. There is controversy about whether cholecystectomy should be performed after PC in elderly high-risk patients. Medical records of patients with AC admitted to the Department of Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, China, between January 2004 and July 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. The elderly high-risk patients with AC who underwent PC were selected for further study. The safety, efficacy, and long-term outcome of PC without cholecystectomy were evaluated in these patients. The symptoms of AC resolved in 98.6 per cent of patients; drainage-related morbidity and mortality rates were 4.1 and 1.4 per cent, respectively. No patient underwent cholecystectomy after PC. The recurrence rate of cholecystitis was 4.1 per cent. The one-year survival rate was 82.2 per cent, and the three-year survival rate was 39.6 per cent. No death was related to cholecystitis, but one patient died of septic shock on the second day after PC. Considering limited survival and a low recurrence rate of cholecystitis in elderly high-risk patients with AC, we propose that PC is a definitive treatment and cholecystectomy is not necessary after resolution of AC symptoms.

scholarly journals Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a nonsurgical therapeutic option for acute cholecystitis in high-risk and critically ill patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 260-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme de Castro Dabus ◽  
Sérgio San Juan Dertkigil ◽  
Jamal Baracat
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Acalculous Cholecystitis ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Distinct Advantage ◽  
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy

Percutaneous cholecystostomy offers a potentially important type of therapy for critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis who present high risk when undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopy under general anesthesia. It offers a distinct advantage for these kinds of patients by avoiding the risks of the surgical intervention. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure with a high success rate and low procedure-related complications. It should be considered not only in temporary management of calculous cholecystitis, but also in definitive treatment in cases of acalculous cholecystitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document