Recurrence patterns after bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1943-1950
Author(s):  
Se Ik Kim ◽  
Eun Ji Lee ◽  
Maria Lee ◽  
Hyunhoon Chung ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
...  

ObjectiveEvidence on recurrence patterns after bevacizumab in epithelial ovarian cancer is still insufficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate recurrence patterns after treatment with bevacizumab as second-line treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively identified epithelial ovarian cancer patients who relapsed ≥6 months after primary treatment consisting of surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2008 and June 2019. Only those who received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with bevacizumab or without bevacizumab as second-line treatment were included (n=192). To adjust confounders, we conducted 1:2 propensity score matching for platinum-free interval and secondary debulking surgery. Imaging studies were performed to locate newly developed or enlarged pre-existing tumors. Recurrence patterns were compared between bevacizumab users (study group) and non-users (control group).ResultsAfter matching, the study group (n=52) and control group (n=104) showed similar baseline clinicopathologic characteristics including platinum-free interval (median (range) 15.3 (6.2–87.3) vs 14.0 (6.2–143.5) months; p=0.29) and patient age at the time of first recurrence (median (range) 55.5 (33.7–72.4) vs 55.0 (35.7–84.2) years; p=0.56). Initially, FIGO stage III disease was the most common in both two groups (55.8% vs 66.3%; p=0.20). Bevacizumab users were less likely to develop disease recurrence in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (13.5% vs 34.6%; p=0.005), pelvis (17.3% vs 35.6%; p=0.018), and abdomen (40.4% vs 61.5%; p=0.012). However, no difference in distant metastasis was observed between the groups (23.1% vs 24.0%; p>0.99). Multivariate analyses adjusting for stage, histologic type, grade, platinum-free interval, and secondary debulking surgery revealed that the use of bevacizumab significantly reduced risks of nodal (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.24; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.56; p=0.001), pelvic (aHR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.68; p=0.003), and abdominal recurrences (aHR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.71; p=0.001). Nevertheless, use of bevacizumab did not influence risk of distant metastasis (aHR 0.70; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.40; p=0.32).ConclusionsIn patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, second-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab is associated with reduced risks of nodal, pelvic, and abdominal recurrences, but similar risks of distant metastases.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17097-e17097
Author(s):  
Dolores Gallardo-Rincon ◽  
Antonio Bahena-Gonzalez ◽  
Edgar Montes-Servín ◽  
Elizabeth Montes-Servín ◽  
David Michel-Tello ◽  
...  

e17097 Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the first cause of gynecological cancer, and the fifth cause of women cancer-death in US. In Mexico, more than 4,500 new cases of ovarian cancer are diagnosed yearly and it represents the second cause of gynecological cancer mortality. Bevacizumab (BVZ) is an antiangiogenic antibody that has been approved for first-line and recurrence therapy in OC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of BVZ in different lines of treatment in Mexican OC patients. Methods: A total of 94 OC patients treated with BVZ were recruited at the Ovarian Cancer Program of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, from February 2012 to September 2018. Clinicopathological characteristics and toxicity was correlated with line of treatment. PFS curves were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, while comparisons among groups were analyzed with log-rank or Breslow tests. Results: Most of the patients were stage IIIC (69.1%) with HGSP histology (73.4%). 24 patients (25.5%) received BVZ as first-line treatment before debulking surgery (50% for suboptimal and 45.8% for optimal cytoreduction). 48 patients (51.1%) received BVZ for second-line (72.9% after a platinum-resistant and 27.1% after a platinum-sensitive recurrence) and 22 patients (23.4%) for three or more lines of treatment. Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were more frequent in multi-treated patients ( P= 0.030). The median PFS was 23.7, 11.7 and 5.8 months for first, second and third or more lines, respectively. Patients with optimal debulking surgery had a better PFS compared with suboptimal and BVZ in first-line patients (24.8 vs 20.9; P= 0.050). Patients with BVZ in second-line who are a platinum-sensitive recurrence had better PFS compared to those with a platinum-resistant disease (15.1 vs 7.6; P= 0.040). Conclusions: OC patients had clinical benefit from treatment with BVZ when used as first-line and first recurrence treatments. The use of BVZ for third or later line treatment has a questionable benefit and is associated with a higher rate of VTE. Also, we highlight that 77% of the patients had the greatest-benefit while 33% had limited-benefit.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1348-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Ferrandina ◽  
M Ludovisi ◽  
R De Vincenzo ◽  
V Salutari ◽  
D Lorusso ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne Havsteen ◽  
Kamma Bertelsen ◽  
Carl C. Gadeberg ◽  
Anders Jacobsen ◽  
Claus Kamby ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1993-1998
Author(s):  
Ning Sun ◽  
Chenchen Li ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Lei Xia ◽  
Xiaoming Wang ◽  
...  

Purpose: To study the effectiveness and safety of apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) in a Chinese tertiary cancer hospital. Methods: Two groups of APC patients who received treatment with single-agent or two-drug combination of gemcitabine-based first-line therapy (50 per group) in The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing were assessed. The study group received apatinib at or above the second line treatment, while the control group was treated with second-line chemotherapy, which was different from first-line single-drug chemotherapy. Patients received treatments until there was improvement in their conditions, or until adverse reactions became intolerable. Complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), disease stabilization (SD), disease progression (PD), incidence of adverse reactions, and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were recorded. Results: The number of PR cases in APC patients who received apatinib as second-line therapy, and the number of PD patients were higher than the corresponding populations in the control group (p < 0.05). Treatment effectiveness was significantly higher in study group patients than in control subjects (p < 0.05). However, the incidence of adverse reactions was lower in the study group than in control group. Median PFS in the study group (5 months) was significantly higher than that of the control group (4.1 months, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of apatinib as second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer is higher than that of the single drug. Apatinib is associated with low incidence of adverse reactions which prolongs PFS. Thus, apatinib has potentials for the clinical management of pancreatic cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document